Which brand of monitors is best for gaming? Basic parameters of monitors

January's CES in Las Vegas not only unveiled several new monitors, but more importantly, several new interesting technologies. One of them is HDR, which promises brighter and richer images in games. And this is not just some “eye-catching” preset in the monitor settings. HDR support must also be provided on the video card side, and the game itself must be initially developed taking into account the requirements of this technology. Also recently, the HDMI 2.1 specification was released with more comprehensive HDR support.

In connection with this innovation, AMD announced that a second version of it will be released in 2017. FreeSync technology, which, like NVIDIA G-SYNC, allows you to synchronize the output of frames by the video card and the refresh rate of the monitor image.

But let’s return from the forefront of monitor manufacturing to slightly more mundane things. What should you look for when buying a gaming monitor right now?

Diagonal

The time when the average user was happy about buying a 17-inch monitor is long gone. Long gone. Now, unless you live in a monitor box, you should choose a device with a diagonal larger than 20 inches. It’s better to have 24 or 27 at once. And if you have extra money, then you can find a use for them - in recent years the market has become full of monitors larger than 30 inches. The problem is that everything is quite individual. For some, playing or working on a 30-plus-inch monitor will seem as comfortable as sitting in the first row of a movie theater and constantly turning your head to see everything. Moreover, if the most ordinary 24- inch monitor will cost you 7 thousand rubles, then the initial 31.5-inch one will cost 20 thousand.

31.5" monitor

Permission

Although resolution can be accurately measured, this parameter is also a matter of taste. In addition, as with displays from any other category of devices, when choosing a resolution you need to start from the screen diagonal. For example, the most common Full HD today will look frankly soapy on a 27-inch monitor. But for some people it’s already “norm”.

4K monitors, curiously, appeared before the average gaming computer could run games with a decent number of frames per second at this resolution. Now even NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 is able to show 40 FPS at 2560x1440 pixels. Therefore, buy a Full HD monitor for gaming computer Nowadays, it’s only worth it if you’re really strapped for cash.

Even a mid-level video card can handle WQHD

Even 4K monitors are now suitable not only for static pictures and watching videos. Thanks to top-end NVIDA and AMD video cards, it became possible to play quite decently at 3840x2160. Some Battlefield 1 in this resolution looks simply magical.

G-SYNC/FreeSync

Update frequency

144 Hz or 60 Hz? If you have the opportunity to take a monitor with more high frequency updates, then you should definitely take advantage of this opportunity. Once you've played with this for a while, you won't want to go back to a standard refresh rate display. The reason is very simple: in dynamic games and films, the frame change becomes very smooth, which is much more pleasing to the eye.

Choosing a gaming monitor that will be useful in everything

The monitor is one of the most “long-lasting” components of a computer. It’s not for nothing that some companies still use long-standing and hopelessly outdated CRT devices. But we still won’t remember the monochrome windows in virtual world, and let’s move on to choosing a modern gaming monitor. In this case, we will focus on different budgets and traditionally start with cheap, but quite acceptable devices.

The lower limit for the diagonal of a modern gaming monitor, regardless of price, is 24 inches (plus or minus tenths). By choosing a smaller size, you are unlikely to save much, and the experience will not be the same. Moreover, the monitor will most likely last longer than other computer components - unlike the same video cards, there is no point in changing them every few years.

Inexpensive monitor for a budget computer

In this segment we are talking not so much about a gaming monitor, but about a universal one - for games, multimedia tasks and work. Nowadays it’s difficult to run into an unsuccessful matrix, since technologies have been developed and well-known brands maintain quality.

Perhaps the main requirement is the presence of digital outputs (HDMI, DP, DVI-D). In this case, you won’t have to look for adapters or otherwise solve problems with connecting the monitor to a modern video card.

One of the most interesting options in this segment is a widescreen (21:9) monitor. The display diagonal is 25 inches, screen resolution is 2560x1080 pixels. One of the advantages besides the price is the frameless design. True, you will have to put up with a glossy screen, which is highly reflective and also quickly collects fingerprints.

There was also a place in the budget segment for a curved monitor. The 23.5-inch radius of curvature is small, so you can get used to it quickly. The resolution of the matte screen with a high-quality VA matrix is ​​1920×1080 pixels, the aspect ratio is 16:9. We can note support for AMD FreeSync technology, which will be an important aspect for gamers.

Got an unusual design. This is a classic monitor for all occasions: 23.8 inches, 16:9, standard definition 1920×1080 pixels, IPS matrix, thin frames around the screen. Unless, after purchasing this monitor, you will have to take a closer look at the image settings (color, brightness, etc.), since they are no good from the factory.

The monitor has good brightness and good color reproduction, but the glossy finish can negate this advantage. The screen diagonal with an AH-IPS matrix is ​​the same 23.8 inches, resolution is 1920x1080 pixels, aspect ratio is 16:9. Nice design, not too high a price.

One of the cheapest monitors in our selection is. It is practically no different from the others in its characteristics, but its appearance is too classic and heavy. But we're interested in image quality (within budget), and in this regard, the LG device is not inferior to others.

Two trailing monitors are closest to gaming options, but at the same time inexpensive. The model has a diagonal of only 21.5 inches, so it is suitable for those who need to save space. But there is a refresh rate of 75 Hz and a slightly marketing 1 ms response, FreeSync support and a TN+Film matrix with Full HD resolution. The alternative is a larger one with a 24-inch screen. Otherwise, it repeats the younger model.

More expensive monitors - gaming and universal

First, we will list the multimedia/gaming ones, and then move on to the “more gaming” ones.

The monitor differs from many others in its almost “square” shape (16:10), which is more typical of older models or some modern professional ones. The matte screen with a diagonal of 24.1 inches has a resolution of 1920×1200 pixels, an AH-IPS matrix, a whole set of interfaces - HDMI, DisplayPort, Mini DisplayPort and MHL, as well as a USB hub with five ports. The stand allows you to adjust the position of the screen along different axes. Let's call this option “the most non-gaming” in our selection (the aspect ratio is not for everyone).

Curved model - . The display has a diagonal of 27 inches, the resolution of the VA matrix is ​​1920x1080 pixels. The screen refresh rate is 60 Hz, there is support for FreeSync technology and built-in speakers. The disadvantages include the lack of fastenings for the bracket, since with this size they would not be superfluous. There are no questions about the matrix.

Monitors with a large diagonal and Full HD resolution have a certain feature - the pixel density (ppi indicator) decreases and the picture becomes pixelated. However, much depends on the characteristics of perception specific user: someone will pay attention to these squares and ladders, others will find the picture comfortable.

I received a matte screen with a diagonal of 29 inches, but the resolution of the IPS matrix with an aspect ratio of 21:9 is 2560 × 1080 pixels. There is support for FreeSync technology, the screen refresh rate is 75 Hz. A wide monitor will be convenient for many games, as well as for work. But, as mentioned above, you need to be prepared for a decrease in picture quality due to low pixel density. Matter of habit.

This is a “classic” analogue of the previous model by modern standards: 27 inches, 16:9 ratio, Full HD, FreeSync, 75 Hz refresh rate, a slightly wider range of connection interfaces. In terms of price, the last two monitors are practically the same.

Now let’s list the “true” gaming options.

These are full-fledged gaming monitors, but the price for them will be appropriate. Let's start with those that are cheaper. Nowadays, TN matrices are “not the same anymore,” so you shouldn’t be afraid of their low efficiency: the picture quality will be at an acceptable level. In the more expensive monitor segment, AMD FreeSync technology is being replaced by NVIDIA G-Sync. It is closed and expensive, so it is probably difficult to find it in budget devices.

In the range of 650-750 rubles, for example, falls. Screen with a diagonal of 24 inches, TN+Film matrix, Full HD resolution, 144 Hz, fast response, a diverse set of interfaces, headphone and microphone jacks, there is also a USB hub. As an alternative, let's call it exactly the same characteristics as the BenQ monitor.

Again a widescreen model from LG. This time with a diagonal of 34 inches. The curved matte display has a resolution of 2560x1080 pixels and an IPS matrix with a frequency of 144 Hz, fast response and FreeSync support. The resolution would be higher, but then the price would increase noticeably. And the requirements for hardware will change.

I received a 27-inch IPS matrix with a response typical for screen technology and a frequency of 144 Hz. There is support for FreeSync technology. The resolution is 2560×1440 pixels, which will make the image clearer and, subjectively, of higher quality. A slightly cheaper alternative would be, for example, the BenQ XL2730Z. However, the matrix of the latter is simpler, and therefore the viewing angles will be smaller.

It can be called a direct competitor to the ASUS monitor; moreover, it supports G-Sync, and there are more gamers with NVIDIA video cards. Once again, questions may arise regarding the TN matrix with characteristic highlights and color washout when shifted to the side. There are no complaints about color reproduction.

27-inch monitor with QHD resolution, IPS matrix and 165 Hz frequency. Despite all the charms, when buying this device you should pay attention to dead pixels and the presence of glare.

The “top” selection is , which will be too tough for most computers. The 34-inch monitor has a wide and curved IPS display (3800R versus 1800R for other devices on our list) with a resolution of 3440×1440 pixels and support for 10-bit color. The frequency is only 100 Hz, which is not enough considering the price and positioning. And yet - a very strange “leg” that will require a lot of space on the table. There are also questions about the uniformity of illumination.

When choosing a monitor, pay attention to what technology is used in the matrix. TN are fast, but have problems with viewing angles, VA will please you with contrast, and IPS will please you with color rendition and viewing angles. At the same time, it would be wrong to make claims against TN matrices in terms of color reproduction, since with proper configuration, most problems disappear. IPS panels tend to be more expensive, but still benefit from TN (if response time is not a critical parameter for you).

The curvature of the screen is again not for everyone. Such monitors imply that you will be at a certain distance and in a certain place - only then will you be able to experience the beauty of such a model. Curved displays with a TN matrix are a completely controversial option.

As for screen resolution, the vast majority of users prefer Full HD, since 2K or especially 4K can hurt the wallet - top-end video cards are not cheap anyway, and given their popularity among miners, the price tag becomes inadequate.

Appearance and stand are a matter of taste. It is better to examine the monitor in person, wondering whether it will fit on the table and how it will look.

We also decided to clarify some issues regarding the impact of such devices on the user’s health. Some prejudices from the past are still alive, although technology has long changed. For comment, we turned to the medical director of the New Vision clinic, Vadim Murashko.

“The possible harm from working behind monitors has been seriously exaggerated. There are no “magic” rays that negatively affect vision,”- the specialist explained. According to him, the problem rather lies in how a person behaves at the computer.

Thus, prolonged fixation of gaze can lead to the appearance of a phenomenon popularly nicknamed “dry eye.” The user “forgets” to blink, the hydration of the mucous membrane noticeably decreases, and as a result the person begins to rub his eyes. As a result, complications or progression of certain ophthalmological diseases may occur. “But it’s not the monitors’ fault,”- emphasizes Vadim Murashko.

You can often read in the press that it is incorrect to compare reading, for example, from a piece of paper with working in front of a monitor. On the contrary, it is quite correct. Reading from a sheet results in an accommodation load (the ability of the eyes to change focal length), often even significantly greater than when reading from a monitor. Well, don’t forget that we work with documents not only in daylight, but also in the light of electric lamps flickering at a frequency of 50 Hz. So attributing all the harm to monitors is not very reasonable.

“Often when we read, we simply give our eyes the work they need,”- noted the expert. Moreover, as an example, Vadim Murashko cited a disease such as childhood amblyopia: various methods are used to treat it, including increased optical load on the “lazy” eye (the healthy one closes, and the other one has to work for two).

“Interesting fact: fans of shooters are the most active computer games, are able to keep up to 5-6 objects in the field of vision, and fans of quiet games - only 2-3,”- our interlocutor added. Nevertheless, the load varies from load to load, and you can’t justify yourself after ten hours of playing games by “training” your attention and eyes. It was not for nothing that Hippocrates said: “Everything is good in moderation.”

We thank the online store TTN.by for their help in preparing the material

Want to know which monitor is best to buy? In TOP 10 we recommend you the best monitor models that are on the market on this moment.

In the top 10 we have selected economical models that can be purchased in the online store Zeon18.ru, they combine high quality images, as well as several models with a large screen in the top.

BenQ GW2270H

We start our top 10 with a model that is intended for those who do not have a large budget. The BenQ GW2270H is a small, 21.5-inch monitor that is ideal for home use. The monitor with AMVA+ matrix has a very good quality Images. Minimalism, simple design and good quality at a reasonable price, that’s all the BenQ GW2270H monitor offers you.

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS

• Display (diagonal): 5 inches
• Connectors: headphone jack, D-Sub, 2 x HDMI

Philips 234E5QHAW

The second monitor we wanted to offer you is Philips. It also stands out for its attractive price and good technical parameters. It has a 23-inch screen and an AH-IPS matrix with Full HD resolution. IPS matrix Provides very good image quality and wide viewing angles, so the monitor will be a good choice for both work and entertainment.

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS

• Display (resolution): 1920 x 1080
• Screen aspect ratio: 16:9
• Connectors: headphone jack, D-Sub, 1 x HDMI
• Matrix refresh rate: 60 Hz

AOC i2369Vm

AOC offers a quality monitor at an attractive price. The monitor has a diagonal of 23.6 inches and an AH-Full HD IPS matrix. Matrix provides good picture, high contrast and accurate colors. The monitor is ideal for work and play. The main thing is that the AOC monitor looks very elegant and has a visually attractive body.

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS

• Display (diagonal): 23 inches
• Display (resolution): 1920 x 1080
• Screen aspect ratio: 16:9
• Connectors: headphone jack, D-Sub, 2 x HDMI, audio mini-jack
• Matrix refresh rate: 60 Hz
• Contrast: Static: 1000:1, Dynamic: 20000000:1

Samsung S27E370DS

The Samsung S27E370DS monitor especially stands out in our Top 10, want to know why? This monitor has a touch screen. The monitor also has a built-in module for wireless charging of smartphones, as well as the integration of AMD FreeSync technology and the “Game” mode, which will ensure the ability to use the monitor in gaming PCs. The monitor also has a 27-inch diagonal display. The monitor is perfect for work, and even better for entertainment.

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS

• Display (diagonal): 27 inches
• Display (resolution): 1920 x 1080
• Screen aspect ratio: 16:9
• Connectors: headphone jack, D-Sub, 1 x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
• Matrix refresh rate: 60 Hz

LG 29UM58-P

The Lg 29UM58-P monitor has a 29-inch screen and a 21:9 screen aspect ratio, which is ideal especially for work. IPS matrix provides good review and good color scheme. The monitor also has many additional settings, various configurations of image parameters, as well as a game mode.

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS

• Display (diagonal): 29 inches
• Display (resolution): 2560 x 1080
• Screen aspect ratio: 21:9
• Contrast: dynamic: 50000000:1
• Matrix refresh rate: 60 Hz

iiyama ProLite XB2783HSU-B1DP

The iyama Prolite XB2783HSU-B1DP is another 27-inch monitor in the top 10. It caught my attention primarily because of its price. The monitor is equipped with an AMVA FullHD sensor. The monitor's response time is quite fast (4ms), high contrast (3000:1) and high brightness (300 cd/m2). The monitor is also very ergonomic and is popular among buyers in the monitor market.

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS

• Display (diagonal): 27 inches
• Display (resolution): 1920 x 1080
• Screen aspect ratio: 16:9
• Contrast: static: 3000:1
• Matrix refresh rate: 60 Hz

Dell U2515H

The Dell U2515H is a high-quality monitor that features a modern, sleek design and many new features. The monitor has a 25-inch IPS screen with a resolution of 2560 x 1440. This resolution allows you to watch extremely detailed and sharp images. A wide viewing angle and good color reproduction are already standard in the case of an IPS matrix. The monitor also has a large number of connectors. The ergonomics of the case also deserves praise; the user has the ability to adjust the horizontal rotation angle and also change the height.

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS

• Display (diagonal): 25 inches
• Screen aspect ratio: 16:9
• Contrast: Static: 1000:1, Dynamic: 20000000:1
• Matrix refresh rate: 60 Hz

Philips 258B6QJEB

The second monitor in our top 10 from Philips also has something to brag about. It has a 25-inch IPS display with a resolution of 2560 x 1440 which should satisfy even the most demanding users. Bright colors, wide viewing angles, fast response time are its main features. Also, in terms of style, the monitor from Philips is quite pleasant to look at and neat. In addition, it is worth mentioning the ergonomics of the case. The monitor has a full range of screen position adjustments, a large number of connectors, and built-in stereo speakers.

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS

• Display: (diagonal): 25 inches
• Connectors: D-Sub, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-D, 1x HDMI, audio mini-jack, 2x USB 2.0, 2x USB 3.0
• Display (resolution): 2560 x 1440
• Screen aspect ratio: 16:9
• Matrix refresh rate: 60 Hz

Asus VX24AH

The Asus VX24AH is a 23.8-inch monitor with a resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The image on the monitor is of excellent quality, every detail on the screen has bright and accurate colors. The original design of the stand greatly improves the ability to adjust the position of the screen. The monitor uses a number of innovative technologies such as: Splendidplus, QuickFit and Asus Eyecare, and the monitor also has built-in stereo speakers.

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS

• Display: (diagonal): 23.8 inches
• Display (resolution): 2560 x 1440
• Screen aspect ratio: 16:9
• Contrast: Dynamic: 20000000:1
• Matrix refresh rate: 60 Hz

Eizo FlexScan EV2455

Our top 10 is completed by a monitor manufactured by Eizo. The monitor is intended for professional use. The monitor has a 24-inch screen with a resolution of 1920 x 1200 pixels. The IPS matrix offers excellent image quality, wide viewing angles and good color reproduction. The Eizo is ergonomically designed and has narrow bezels around the screen. Interestingly, the monitor has a presence sensor that reacts when you get up from your chair and walk away, and then the screen automatically goes into energy-saving mode.

MAIN CHARACTERISTICS

• Display: (diagonal): 23.1 inches
• Display (resolution): 1920 x 1200
• Screen aspect ratio: 16:9
• Contrast: static: 1000:1
• Matrix refresh rate: 60 Hz

In recent years, the concept of a “gaming monitor” has clearly ingrained itself in the minds of consumers, something that the marketing departments of manufacturing companies have been striving for for so long. Now, few people think that for decades (!) we have been playing with models with not the fastest matrices, with a standard vertical scan frequency of 60 Hz and without any additional technologies that improve the perception of the gameplay. And most importantly, almost no one complained.

Coming to the store in 2018 (or choosing it yourself on the Internet) and setting the task of choosing a display with an eye to frequent online battles, many refuse to consider models with a frequency of less than 100 Hz, even if the previous monitor was not very fast and Everything seemed to be completely and completely satisfactory, but now there was simply an opportunity to buy something new. It is easy to understand such buyers, because progress does not stand still, the visual difference between 60 and 120 Hz is confirmed by almost all users, and therefore, if you have the financial opportunity, it is a sin to refuse the modern benefits of the IT industry.

Questions when choosing such monitors, which ultimately often act as universal solutions, perhaps arise somewhat more than when selecting displays with characteristics that are less exciting to the majority of the public. To simplify this task and help you spend significantly less of your precious time, we decided to talk about the main selection criteria (in a fairly brief form) of gaming models and give specific examples of the optimal, in our opinion, options available for sale.

Where to begin

First of all, as when making a purchase of any other equipment, you need to clearly define your budget: plan the amount with which you are willing to part with relatively easily, and set the maximum bar to which you are willing to rise if necessary - in order to get the best of the most suitable for your needs. Without this, the selection process can drag on for a long time, and if you add to this the constant expectation of what the manufacturers will present in a month/quarter/six months, then even for a year or two, or even ad infinitum.

Here we note the following: practice shows that most of the new on the monitor market is well-forgotten old in a new “wrapper”, and for real and serious improvements, manufacturers initially ask too much. Thus, in most cases, you should focus on time-tested technologies or be prepared to overpay for newness and additional features/features.

At the second stage, you should decide whether the new monitor will be the only one on your desktop, used to perform a variety of tasks, or whether it will become a second one and will be used exclusively for games without serious demands on picture quality - the type of monitor that is suitable for you greatly depends on this. matrices. There are often cases when a person is professionally engaged in photography, video or graphics, but does not deny himself the pleasure of spending a couple of hours playing the game and wants to get a high-quality device “for everything at once.” Then the choice is sharply limited and simplified. The same is true if the buyer simply needs the fastest monitor on the market, and he is ready to turn a blind eye to all its shortcomings, even if there are a lot of these shortcomings.

Next, we immediately move on to the technical aspects of choice, not forgetting that in this material we will consider only the segment of real “gaming monitors,” which can only include models with a vertical scan frequency of 100 Hz and higher. We know that many manufacturers are trying to classify models with 60-75 Hz into this class, but let this remain on their conscience, because with the same success almost all solutions released over the past 10-15 years could be called “gaming”. the only difference is the support for adaptive synchronization systems, which remove tearing and some jerkiness of the picture, but are not able to increase the smoothness of what is happening on the screen while maintaining the already familiar vertical scan frequency.

What are the characteristics and what do they affect?

Diagonal and aspect ratio

Diagonal and aspect ratio are characteristics that, oddly enough, have some dependence on each other. On the market of modern gaming (!) monitors with high refresh rates, you can find models of two main formats (16:9 and 21:9) and a couple of virtually exclusive monitors with non-standard ratios 32:9 and 32:10.

For models with a 16:9 aspect ratio that we are all familiar with, the screen diagonal starts from 23.5 inches and ends at 32-inch solutions. Fast “cinema” 21:9 displays are limited to 34-35 inches diagonally, while ultra-wide ones are offered in sizes of 43 and 49 inches. The choice here can be based both on personal experience (for example, over time your monitor began to seem small and you want more), and on the physical ability to place large display on the desk, work tasks, area of ​​interest, distance from the eyes to the surface of the screen and, of course, visual acuity - so that you can do without the still somewhat problematic Windows OS scaling system.

When choosing a diagonal, the rules are simple:

• how worse vision, the screen diagonal can (but should not) be larger;
• The longer the working distance, the larger the screen you can afford without creating unnecessary problems.

Both rules also work in the opposite direction (good vision and short working distance), but, unfortunately, we cannot give exact examples of the relationship between screen size and comfortable distance to the eyes.

As for the advice in various sources about a comfortable distance to the screen being 1.5-2 times its diagonal (for a 24-inch monitor this is 92-122 cm), one can only be surprised and ask the authors of such advice whether they often They see on sale tables with a depth of more than 60-70 cm and how many monitors on the market are there with a stand that allows you to place the screen almost at the very edge of the table. In addition, such advice does not seem to take into account visual acuity, which not everyone can boast of.

When choosing an aspect ratio, things are a little more complicated. Here you need to decide what you want to get. Often watch films shot in the correct “cinema” format 2.35:1/2.4:1, prefer to simultaneously see the windows of three or more applications on the screen, do photo processing and retouching, video editing, and in modern (this is important!) games, would you mind expanding your field of view? In this case, we strongly recommend choosing among large 21:9 models and, perhaps, considering monitors in 32:9 and 32:10 formats, which are essentially a “glue together” of two 27-inch Full HD (49-inch option) or two 24-inch WUXGA (43-inch model).

Are you not bothered by the black bars on the sides and in general do you like to watch movies, series and TV shows on a large TV, prefer to keep everything in sight, like to play old games and don’t see anything wrong with constantly switching between several applications? If the answer is positive, forget about everything except standard 16:9 format models - even if they are not the future, they will be afloat for a very long time. This option is also suitable if you simply have no desire to get used to something new, and you call everything that differs from 16:9 television a “tank gap”, as was the case 10 years ago with the first models Full HD standard.

Let's touch on the topic a little curved screens. Of course, the fashion for them continues, but the pace of production of such models has slowed down, manufacturers are no longer so zealous in demonstrating the need to “bend” panels, because for large and, especially, wide matrices, this feature has become the norm, which is not surprising at all as much as it was a couple of years ago back. Without it, color rendition at the edges of the screen will differ more from the central zone, monitors will take up more work space, and users will have to turn their heads more often. Working on such models in CAD programs or doing 3D modeling is not the most comfortable and enjoyable pastime. It is difficult to get used to not noticing curved lines (which should be straight), but with a strong desire it is quite possible. If your field of activity does not involve working with such software, then there is no need to worry again - take it and don’t think about it. This also applies to small Curved displays. In them, the curvature of the panel is a tribute to fashion and an attempt to slightly improve the stability of the picture over the entire area of ​​​​the matrix.

Working resolution

Depending on the selected screen diagonal and aspect ratio, you may be left with several options for working resolution, or you may be limited to one single option.

Among Full HD gaming models there are models from 23.5 to 32 inches, UFHD (2560x1080 pixels) - only 34 inches, WQHD live in the segment of 23.8-31.5-inch solutions, UWQHD will captivate you with a diagonal of 34-35 inches, and high-speed 4K can now only be found among 27-inch monitors.

The higher the screen resolution, the higher the pixel density (ppi) level, which directly affects the clarity of the picture. The difference is quite clearly visible when placing models with different ppi levels next to each other, it catches your eye when moving from a model with a low ppi to a solution with a high one, but quickly disappears if the distance to the screen is quite large and simply over time - a habit develops . Talk about the need to buy models with high resolution We won’t have a screen, because many people are still satisfied with large Full HD models with “fat pixels,” so this point is very individual. However, if finances and eyesight allow, then it is better to give preference to models with increased pixel density.

The second reason to consider high-resolution models is the desire to see more on the screen without having to scroll and expand tabs. Of course, the size of the working elements and text will be smaller (when comparing models with the same diagonal), but the quality of the details will be high. Work will become more comfortable, and productivity will increase. In the case of games, the difference will be determined more by the aspect ratio than by the working resolution. The only thing you can count on when increasing it is a reduction in the size of some interface elements, graphic blocks and text. But how important this is for the player is a big question!

The third and most important point for those who like to play is the difference in the load on the computing components of the system. This most affects the graphics subsystem when complex calculations. And if for games in Full HD resolution with medium graphics settings it may now be enough Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti (and GTX 1060 for high quality settings, with a margin for a few more years), then for WQHD it is better to look towards the GTX 1070 and 1070 Ti, for UWQHD (3440×1440) - at the GTX 1080 and 1080 Ti, and for For comfortable gaming in 4K, it is advisable to put money aside for new generation cards - and then you won’t have to think about replacing them in the next 1-2 years (if you’re very lucky). However, if a stable 30-40 fps is enough for you or you agree to medium and low graphics settings, then the list of suitable options can be safely expanded.

Separately, I would like to touch on the topic of purchasing a monitor with a high resolution and its further use at lower values. The option, of course, is appropriate when your new video card I haven’t had time to come back from the store yet, but, from our point of view, it’s still not worth doing this “permanently”. This defeats the whole point of purchasing an expensive display: the clarity and quality of the picture decreases due to the use of interpolation algorithms. In some models this mode works better, in others worse, but it certainly won’t be possible to achieve the same quality as with the “native” resolution.

Types of matrices: advantages and disadvantages

Some 3-4 years ago, only models with TN+Film matrices could be classified as real gaming monitors, but they fundamentally did not suit those who wanted to get a universal device - not only fast, but also with accurate color reproduction, stable images and good viewing angles. After the appearance of the first 120 Hz TNs, we had to wait more than 5 years, but now you can find a fast monitor for every taste and budget on sale.

Let us highlight the main advantages and disadvantages of each type of matrix found in gaming models.

TN+Film:

• + high availability (with rare exceptions)
• + maximum response speed and options with the highest vertical frequency (200-240 Hz)
• − poor viewing angles, low picture stability
• − banding, image posterization
• − pronounced “crystalline effect” (not always, but often)

*VA-type (SVA, MVA, AMVA):

• + deep black (with rare exceptions)
• + invisible “crystalline effect”
• average viewing angles and picture stability
• banding, bad gradients (not always, but often)
• − Black-Crush effect
• − the most low speed response (especially on dark transitions)

IPS-type (IPS, AHVA, PLS):

• + high response speed (in most cases)
• + almost indistinguishable “crystalline effect”
• + good viewing angles and picture stability
• + high-quality gradients and no banding
• − the most expensive, all other things being equal (diagonal, resolution, frequency)

You may be surprised not to find such terms as “backlight uniformity” and “Glow effect” in the lists, but there is a simple explanation for this: absolutely all modern matrices of any type can demonstrate both good and bad backlight uniformity; both a strongly pronounced “glow” and a weakly noticeable one. There are no more leaders and outsiders. It is necessary to consider and evaluate not the type of panel, but the specific model of the matrix installed in the monitor.

Response speed, scan frequency, black frame insertion

The fastest, all other things being equal, are still the TN+Film solutions. They are followed by IPS-type, and all *VA-models receive bronze. It’s definitely not worth relying on the response time figures indicated by manufacturers in the technical specifications - this is just a profanation. The measurement techniques used, which evaluate 1-2 possible color transitions, have never given an idea of ​​the speed of the display, since in real use there are tens of thousands of possible transitions, and they all differ in time, sometimes by several times.

You should focus exclusively on direct comparisons of models (put them side by side and run the same test), instrumental measurements and photographic evidence (not the most accurate method, but better than nothing). You'll be amazed at how different they can be different models with the same stated GtG (Gray to Gray) time.

From response time directlyThe clarity of moving elements/objects on the screen and the length of the cables depend(remains of the image from the previous frame). The lower it is, the higher the monitor speed and the clearer the dynamic image.

In numbers, the maximum time for any color transition should not exceed the time allowed by the monitor for one frame (1000 ms / 60 Hz = 16.66 ms or 1000 ms / 144 Hz = 6.94 ms, etc.). The greater the discrepancy, the stronger the plumes. The desire to level out this discrepancy will certainly lead you to the most worthy representatives of the TN+Film camp or to big expenses when purchasing top-end IPS solutions.

Vertical scan frequency is the second important parameter by which you should select a monitor and on which it depends visual smoothness of what is happening on the screen. Some of the readers will exclaim: “Why is this not the first most important parameter?” We answer: if the matrix is ​​slow, then a high scanning frequency is useful, but not much. You will be annoyed by the length of the cables, and the whole point of purchasing such a gaming monitor, frankly speaking, is lost.

Determining the required maximum vertical scan frequency is as easy as shelling pears. If you are interested in e-sports, participate in professional tournaments, and the main disciplines are games where high speed and reaction time are extremely important, then you should take a closer look at TN+Film with a frequency of 180 to 240 Hz. Do you love playing something similar, but at an amateur level? Then choose models with a frequency of about 120-144 Hz. Gaming is taking up less and less time in your life, and you just want to increase the fluidity of what's happening on your screen? In this case, you can easily drop to the level of 100-120 Hz and not feel discomfort for many years.

For some of their models, manufacturers provide a special backlight operating mode with the so-called “black frame insertion” (ULMB, ELMB, etc.). When activated, the backlight switches to pulse mode and works synchronously with the screen refresh rate, synchronizing the output frame rate. CRT monitors work on the same principle.

As a result, we see only the final frames without a transition stage: the clarity of objects in the frame increases “to the skies”, there are no discernible trails (with rare exceptions). The disadvantage of such backlight operating modes is the increased strain on the eyes, and at a low frequency, it is likely that some users will even be able to detect an unpleasant flicker. In addition, there are some limitations: the frequency at which the ULMB/ELMB mode can operate often does not exceed 120-144 Hz, and collaboration cannot be paired with active G-Sync or FreeSync.

On the other hand, if the monitor is initially very fast (this mainly applies to TN+Film models with a frequency of 180-240 Hz), then there is no point in modes with the insertion of a “black frame”. The visual difference turns out to be not so big as to further strain our visual apparatus.

Adaptive synchronization technologies (G-Sync, FreeSync)

As an additional bonus for players, monitor manufacturers use adaptive synchronization technologies: and , each of which we learned in detail earlier. The main task of both is to synchronize the frame generation rate produced by the GPU with the screen refresh rate, eliminating horizontal image tearing and providing a smoother picture compared to the usual V-Sync. The difference between the proposals of the two sworn competitors lies in the operating frequency range (G-Sync has a wider one), image output latency (FreeSync usually has less) and, of course, work with the GPU certain models. In addition, the operation of this technology for the “green” ones is ensured by a special hardware module, which must be used in the monitor, which leads to a significant increase in the cost of the finished product. Add to this Nvidia's license fees (royals), and we get a clear answer to the question of why it is so expensive.

In turn, FreeSync is the marketing name for the Adaptive-Sync technology introduced in the DisplayPort 1.2 standard specification and its subsequent versions. Manufacturers who want to support AMD can absolutely legally and free of charge release a monitor with FreeSync “on board”, which we are seeing more and more often: approximately 80% of displays with an adaptive synchronization system support FreeSync, although so far all buyers and users of Nvidia video cards still the majority, which is at least proven by the statistics of the Steam service.

It is worth noting AMD technology LFC(Low Framerate Compensation), included in the FreeSync complex. It expands the refresh rate range of the screen and increases the smoothness of the gameplay at frequencies up to 30 frames per second. Efficiency similar method the impact is still in question for many, since at 30 fps or less in any case it is difficult to imagine smooth and comfortable gameplay.

In the chest Nvidia there is software technology Fast-Sync, hidden deep in the driver settings and is a direct alternative to V-Sync. It appeared not so long ago, and therefore many users are not even aware of its existence.

It does not require special monitors to operate; it works on absolutely any model (even with declared FreeSync support). The main thing is that your system has an installed video card with an Nvidia GPU, preferably one of two last generations, and a new driver version.

Conventional vertical synchronization V-Sync allows you to deal with tearing relatively effectively, but it has significant disadvantages: input lag and fps limitation. Fast-Sync also eliminates frame tearing and micro-lag, but there is no increase in input lag that negatively affects the gameplay. Comparing with G-Sync, we can note the high-quality work of Fast-Sync at very high fps levels (100 and above), but if the frame level fluctuates over a wide range (for example, from 40 to more than 100 fps), then hardware solution turns out to be more effective. But, as you already understand, you will have to pay a lot for this.

By the way, if you have an Nvidia video card, but your financial capabilities do not allow you to purchase a monitor with a G-Sync module, do not be upset - feel free to buy any other one, including one with declared support for AMD FreeSync, because this feature will not hinder you in any way. The same can be said for users AMD video cards: if it turns out that the monitor you like is aimed more at fans of “green”, then this should not affect your choice in any way. Yes, in both cases you will be left without hardware adaptive synchronization systems, but all the other advantages of the monitor will not go away.

Connection interfaces

You’re unlikely to choose a gaming monitor based on the available connection interfaces, but we couldn’t ignore this speaker in the technical specifications. At the moment, all fast monitors are required to be equipped with modern DisplayPort and HDMI ports. They said goodbye to DVI-D and, especially, D-Sub a long time ago.

For DP, the minimum is version 1.2 with support for high refresh rates at resolutions from Full HD to UWQHD and adaptive synchronization technologies. It is DP that is the main interface for gaming models. Video cards starting with Nvidia GTX 960 and AMD Radeon RX 380 are capable of squeezing a stable maximum scan frequency from modern monitors. Earlier solutions will introduce restrictions at approximately 160-180 Hz for Full HD and 120 Hz for WQHD.

The latest version, DP 1.4, is relevant exclusively for high-speed UHD 4K models with a frequency of 120-144 Hz and full HDR support thanks to a multi-zone backlight system. For simpler models, DP 1.4 will not provide any advantages over the remaining most popular DP 1.2/1.2a.

The HDMI interface is in most cases set by manufacturers for connection game consoles and third-party players. Its version 1.4/1.4b is only sufficient for medium-speed Full HD solutions (no higher than 144 Hz), and HDMI 2.0 will introduce restrictions in the form of a maximum of 144 Hz for WQHD and 100 Hz for UWQHD. Only AMD FreeSync adaptive synchronization technology can work with HDMI. For Nvidia G-Sync DisplayPort 1.2 and higher is required.

One of the most modern connection options - USB Type-C - is starting to appear in more and more new products, but it should be taken only as nice addition. Its capabilities are quite limited, so manufacturers are counting on 60-75 Hz, without support for any adaptive sync technology.

Additional "chips"

To attract buyers to their models, manufacturers hang a “ton of labels”, describing in paint the advantages of certain software technologies, often only spoiling the final image on the screen.

When choosing, you should not focus on dozens of preset modes for games of different genres. Two, maximum three (including activated by default) of them will be enough for you, and functions like "black stabilizer"(to change visibility in deep shadows) during manual adjustment.

Sharpening “technologies” often turn out to be useless ( Super Sharpness, VividPixel, Clarity), working very roughly and negatively affecting the elaboration of small details. Various systems a la Low Blue Light, which reduce the blue component of the spectrum, also turn out to be quite useless (but not for everyone). During their operation, the brightness of the backlight decreases, the color temperature drops to a level of 4000-5500 K, and the established gamma curves change in order to reduce the contrast of the image. Such global changes in the image on the screen sometimes lead to confusion and leave no desire to stop there. color mode. In addition, if you continue to sit at the monitor without taking proper breaks from work, then no additional presets will definitely help you - your eyes and head will continue to hurt.

Names of functions available for activation Low Input-lag or Extreme Low Input-lag They sound attractive, but in reality they give little effect (and sometimes do not give at all), since the vast majority of gaming models, even without additional settings, have no problems with this parameter, to which advanced players are very demanding.

An important positive feature of a modern monitor can be considered Flicker-free backlight(no flicker). The vast majority have it gaming displays, but there are also exceptions in which it is used hybrid system(flicker appears only in certain range changes in brightness) or the flicker frequency is almost always at the level of 200-400 Hz, which can (but does not necessarily have to) lead to increased fatigue.

Another useful function (with some “buts”), according to the author, is an additional on-screen sight, which the monitor “draws” independently - strictly in the center of the screen. This is, of course, not the choice of the most honest players, but you will do anything to win. In this matter, we will probably do without advice.

HDR support- something that the newest models cannot do without. Here it is worth understanding the following: real expansion dynamic range is possible solely thanks to multi-zone backlighting, which is currently used only in the most expensive (more than 150 thousand rubles) gaming models. All other options are just names, even if the monitor has a color gamut wider than standard sRGB. Manufacturers provide support for EOTF gamma correction, which directly affects the gamma curves and final image contrast, but nothing fancy happens. You could do almost the same thing on your old monitors, simply by setting a different gamma mode (closer to the average value of 2.4) and increasing color saturation.

This list is complemented by the so-called "extended color gamut", on which manufacturers are increasingly betting. For games, it seems to us, this is not at all bad, but for lovers of everything bright, contrasting, rich - it’s just what the doctor ordered. If you buy universal monitor, for which you plan to work with color, then you should give preference to models with a more familiar color gamut at the sRGB level. Focus on the promoted one of about two recent years DCI-P3 This should only be done if you are creating video content that you plan to display on large TV screens in the future.

Optimal models

Once you have decided on the characteristics that are most suitable for you, you can move on to the next stage - actually choosing a new monitor. In this section, the author tried to highlight the optimal, in his opinion, models, most of which he was lucky enough to work closely with. Some of them, without a doubt, can be called the best in their segments, while others are simply “good”, suitable in the absence of the opportunity to get something better. However, we will try to do without giving out such loud and not so loud titles, simply directing your thoughts in the right direction. For convenience, we will do this primarily based on the working resolution of the monitors, and we will start with the Full HD standard that is familiar to many.

Full HD (1920×1080)

BenQ Zowie XL2411P

If you just want to get a fast and cheapest monitor, preference should be given to the model. There is nothing superfluous in the monitor (even FreeSync support), but thanks to it you can decide whether you are ready for modern TN+Film displays or whether it is better to immediately start searching among *VA models (IPS, we remind you, are not represented in this class).

Just one of these options - affordable, small and for lovers of *VA technology. Considering its cost, many expectations will be met, but in terms of speed, this model will in any case be worse than the above-mentioned BenQ and all analogues on TN+Film.

Asus PG258Q

The fastest, highest quality and smallest Full HD monitor for less than 30 thousand rubles can be called one with FreeSync support. This is a 24.5-inch solution with a TN+Film matrix and a frequency of 240 Hz, capable of meeting the high level of gaming of its owner. If you are interested in similar solutions, but with G-Sync, then the choice will be between and. The main difference, as always, is in price and design. There is no clear winner among them.

When shopping for a fast and affordable 27-inch display, you'll likely come across a new . This solution has all the shortcomings of TN+Film, but for 26 thousand rubles you will get a fairly large 240 Hz monitor with FreeSync support, which, in the aggregate, has no competitors at the moment.

LG 27GK750F

Looking for a similar monitor, but with G-Sync? Alas, you will have to drop to 144 Hz and pay about 8-10 thousand rubles more for the Acer Predator XB271HAb. Is the TN+Film matrix annoying again? Then the only one more or less decent option- on *VA, for which you won’t have to overpay much.

The latest innovations in the Full HD segment are 32-inch *VA models - solutions, frankly speaking, are very much for everyone. All of them are as similar as possible, and therefore it remains to focus on design and price. We can include the most successful monitors, but be prepared to encounter the most “fat” pixels and not the best viewing angles.

UFHD (2560×1080)

This class of monitors is becoming less and less popular every year, but there is still demand. Buyers are concerned about large grains and limited choice. The most affordable member of this family of gaming displays is its pioneer with AMD FreeSync support. The solution is not the fastest and most trouble-free, so if you can pay extra, you should pay attention to the new and improved one with Nvidia G-Sync on board. There is no big point in overpaying for similar Acer Predator Z35, unless you are not satisfied with the appearance and quality of the “Korean” finish.

Dell Alienware AW3418HW

A separate line should be noted for the only representative of the 30-inch UFHD models - with the Tobii Eye Tracker eye tracking function, but without G-Sync. The model will be of interest primarily to those for whom 34-35-inch giants are simply not suitable in size.

WQHD (2560×1440)

The Iiyama company relatively recently made a gift to fans of the WQHD standard and fast gaming monitors with its . The solution is sold for 30-32 thousand rubles, is equipped with an already proven TN+Film matrix and offers FreeSync support. If there is some mistrust in this brand, then everything is the same, but in a different wrapper I am ready to offer an old one, which has fallen greatly in price since its release. The best, not only in the opinion of the author, is with support for Nvidia G-Sync and ULMB backlight mode - for advanced players with powerful PCs based on GeForce series GPUs, this is perhaps optimal choice. We would not give preference to similar 23.8-inch WQHD models: everything on the screen will be small and it will be necessary to activate the Windows scaling system, which is not the most trouble-free.

Iiyama G-Master GB2760QSU

*VA solutions will provide greater screen image stability, better viewing angles and often (but not always) the backlight uniformity associated with these panels, coupled with a deep black field. At the same time the best and optimal solution in the camp of 27-inch monitors stands out. It will not captivate you with the same response speed as the options on TN+Film, and some may be bothered by the peculiarities of the font design, but, nevertheless, it will provide a completely different user experience, which is why they leave TN.

Now let's move on to 27-inch IPS. It continues to rule here - the undisputed leader of the segment thanks to the company’s competent pricing policy and stability of quality over the past 2 years. The monitor will delight you not only with excellent color reproduction and stable images, but also with a very high panel speed. Those who are not satisfied with the appearance of the Acer model can safely look at its main and more expensive competitor Asus ROG Swift PG279Q. It doesn’t have any significant advantages, just a different – ​​more modern and stylish – design.

LG 32GK850G

Quite high-quality WQHD displays with a screen diagonal of 31.5-32 inches include the AOC AG322QCX (the first monitor released in this segment). An alternative to them are new products from LG: tested by reviewers with Nvidia G-Sync and the just presented 32GK850F with support for AMD FreeSync 2 and pseudo-HDR. Another important difference between both models and solutions from AOC and Samsung is a flat matrix with less problematic elaboration of fonts and small elements.

UWQHD (3440×1440)

If you don't care Nvidia support G-Sync, then you can start getting acquainted with the class of fast UWQHD displays with excellent solutions Samsung companies, time-tested: and . The models differ slightly in price, matrix used (*VA 1500R with QD-LED backlight and *VA 1800R with W-LED) and design. It’s quite easy to make a choice: if you’re not afraid of unusually saturated/rich colors and a larger bending radius, then a model with QD-LED will be the best choice.

Samsung C34F791WQI

The next level is IPS solutions with a vertical scanning frequency of 100 Hz. Here you should choose from and Dell Alienware AW3418DW. These manufacturers have different warranty policies (Dell, in case of a defect, a courier arrives immediately with a new copy), the appearance is very different, poor factory setting, but with Acer it’s easy to change it for the better without full calibration. The built-in acoustic system of an Alienware monitor is unlikely to be a determining factor, but the quality of workmanship and the rigor of a competitor can put an end to the choice.

UHD 4K (3860x2160)

4K models with high vertical scanning frequency can be treated differently. Some were waiting for them like manna from heaven, while others believe (and performance tests confirm this) that there is no point in them and will not be until GPU manufacturers raise the speed bar for their graphics solutions by 2-3 times from current indicators.

Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ

At the time of writing this material, the choice of fast 4K models is scarce and is represented by two 27-inch monitors with a frequency of 144 Hz: Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ and Acer Predator X27. There was no fundamental difference between them (except for the design, materials used and external lighting systems), their capabilities are identical, but the price is very different: the Acer solution is almost 50 thousand rubles cheaper. It is quite possible that soon the difference will not be so significant, but you will still have to choose based on your liking for a particular brand or appearance. All that remains is to save up 180-220 thousand rubles, having previously acquired a PC of no less value.

Other solutions

IN other solutions Our guide is based on Samsung models - the only ones actually sold with a resolution of 3840x1080. Despite the release of a more affordable and, unfortunately, technically simplified solution, the pioneer in a new segment for the desktop monitor market remains optimal and relevant. Some are afraid of its size, others are annoyed by the “fat” pixel, but if you do not belong to these two categories of buyers, then this display should not disappoint you.

Samsung C49HG90DMI

A completely new 43-inch model with a resolution increased to 3840×1200 pixels and, accordingly, a higher pixel density should soon appear on store shelves. The matrix of this model is *VA-type with a maximum scanning frequency of 120 Hz; support for one of the adaptive synchronization systems is not provided. Based on experience with 49-inch devices, we can assume that there should not be any critical shortcomings, and competitors will not appear for a long time.

Conclusion

Choosing a gaming monitor is not at all the same as choosing a new one motherboard, RAM, cooler, video card or even photo/video camera. Here it will not be enough to study the technical specifications and colorful pictures on the Internet. It will be difficult for many to clearly decide and be confident in their choice, and if there is no experience working with models of different classes and levels, then it will be completely impossible to do this without going to an offline store. Not everyone can afford to buy a “pig in a poke,” both from a financial point of view (suddenly there will be no opportunity to return the product you don’t like) and from the point of view of time costs.

On average, a new monitor is purchased for the next 5-7 years of service, and many would like to make the most correct choice. Doing this based solely on outside feedback and advice would be a mistake, as there are a lot of variables that depend on your individual characteristics (for example, visual acuity), preferences and working conditions.

The big advantage of the segment of full-fledged gaming solutions is the relatively small number of models, which will make the search easier and quickly eliminate unsuitable options from the list. You won’t have to sort through a couple of hundred commercially available displays, which will save your time and nerve cells, and the above tips, we hope, will be a good assistant in solving the task in a short time.

The Internet is simply flooded with offers for the sale of monitors, new and old, from expensive to budget models. Accordingly, each manufacturer tries to please as many consumers as possible, “spitting out” more and more new models on the market. Sometimes stuffing old monitors with unnecessary functions that the average consumer does not need at all. Entering a computer hardware store, we will also see a large number of monitors, and in each store they will persuade you to buy this or that model, and not just persuade you, but justify its advantages with various “bells and whistles” and their irreplaceability, which can be very controversial with experts' point of view. However, unfortunately, most of us will not be able to object to this, but it is worth noting that the monitor is the least susceptible. And just as sellers read articles on how to sell a product, we suggest you arm yourself with the knowledge of one that will meet your requirements.

Decide on the monitor screen size. In monitors and televisions, screen size is measured in inches (1 inch = 2.54 cm) diagonally. If 5 years ago 17-inch monitors were in demand, now the overwhelming majority of sales are for monitors with a diagonal of 19 inches and above, and in the second half of 2008, every second monitor purchased had a diagonal of 22 inches. This is due to a significant reduction in prices for these monitors: in particular, prices 19-inch LCD monitors start at $100, at 22-inch LCD monitors– from 160 dollars. At the same time, in order to buy a 24 inch monitor or more you need to collect at least $180.

Tip #2. Or maybe choose a widescreen monitor?

IN Lately Widescreen monitors are rapidly gaining momentum in popularity. Instead of the old familiar 4:3 size, these LCD monitors have an aspect ratio of 16:10. At first, the workspace will seem too large, elongated horizontally and uncomfortable, but once you buy such a monitor and try it out, you will immediately appreciate all the advantages of a widescreen monitor: you will not need to “hide” toolbars in applications (thus narrowing the usable space) , several windows can easily fit on your display, and watching movies at home will feel like going to the cinema.

Tip #3. Which matrix is ​​better to choose a monitor with?

In order to enjoy the achievements of civilization, it is not at all necessary to understand how this or that device works. Therefore go into technical features we will not. Here it should be written that the type of matrix is ​​a set of features of the effect on the liquid crystals of the monitor to obtain an image. Today, LCD monitors with three types of matrices are available for sale: S-IPS, TN-film and PVA/MVA. If you are professionally involved in photography or design, then we recommend that you choose a monitor with an S-IPS matrix, which provides better color rendition and better viewing angles, but you won’t be able to buy a monitor with such a matrix for less than $500-550. PVA/MVA matrices, in turn, have better contrast, and you can buy a monitor with such a matrix for at least $300 (19-inch LCD monitor). But don’t be upset, because only a good specialist who probably knows in advance what kind of monitor he wants to buy can feel and, therefore, appreciate these not cheap advantages. It is better for the average consumer to choose a monitor with a TN-film matrix, because this will be the most optimal in terms of price-quality ratio. In addition, many global monitor manufacturers have spent the last few years investing heavily in improving the performance of monitors with this most popular matrix (90% of monitor sales) and significant results have now been achieved. So the TN-film matrix is ​​what you need!

Tip #4. Pay attention to the screen resolution. What are dead pixels?

The entire LCD monitor screen is divided into small dots (called pixels or grains), from which the image is composed. Naturally than smaller size each point, the better the image will be. Resolution is the number of pixels that the monitor displays vertically and horizontally. Please note that the manufacturer usually states a recommended resolution (as the resolution can be changed for each monitor), which corresponds to a certain screen refresh rate. As the resolution increases, the refresh rate decreases. It should be remembered that working on a monitor with a refresh rate of less than 60 hertz leads to rapid fatigue and headaches, and the optimal refresh rate is 75-100 hertz. Therefore, you should be interested in the real working resolution (usually at a frequency of 60-75 hertz), which for 19-inch monitors should not be less than 1280x960 pixels, for 22-inch monitors - at least 1600x1050 pixels, the dot size should be no more than 0.3 mm , and a dot size of less than 0.278 is a very good indicator.

Due to the technical features of the LCD monitor, some pixels may not change color, i.e. be constantly black, white or colored. Such pixels are called “broken”. The presence of three “dead” pixels is not a warranty case, so before you buy a monitor, ask the seller if he checks for such “dead” pixels before selling.

Tip #5. What matrix response time is acceptable?

The response time of the matrix is minimum time, during which one frame can be replaced by another. How less time response - the better (and, accordingly, the monitor is more expensive). If this time is too long, the image will be blurred (since the monitor will not have time to change pictures). To choose a monitor with the necessary and sufficient response time, let's think logically: if the rate of change of pictures in a movie is 25 frames per second, then the longest acceptable response time of your monitor can be 40ms (1sec/25 frames=1000ms/25=40ms). For modern monitors with a TN-film matrix, this figure is usually no more than 8ms (on average 5ms - and this is very good indicator). For PVA/MVA matrices this figure is usually no more than 25ms (this is also enough). There is also a statement that for a gaming computer it is preferable to choose a monitor with a response time of 2ms. Of course, a fast monitor response is important, but the difference when using monitors with 2ms and 5ms is quite difficult to feel.

Tip #6. All other things being equal, give preference to monitors with a digital DVI input

The monitor can be connected to the computer via or input. In the second case, the transformation analog signal occurs thanks to special schemes. In the case of a digital input, a direct connection is made between the computer and the monitor without the need for conversion, which is undoubtedly better and the picture is clearer. The conclusion is simple: we recommend choosing a monitor with a digital DVI input.

Tip #7. Brightness and contrast - don't be fooled!

Monitor brightness indicates the amount of light emitted by an all-white monitor screen. Contrast is defined as the ratio of the brightness of the lightest and darkest areas. Without going into technical details, it should be said that the monitor will have as much contrast as the depth of black it can display. We recommend that you choose a monitor with a brightness of 250 to 400 cd/m2 (candelas per square meter), and the contrast should not be less than 500:1. The optimal contrast is in the range of 700:1 to 1000:1. Some manufacturers and sellers also offer to buy a monitor with a declared contrast ratio of 5000:1, 8000:1, and so on. Don't be fooled - these numbers are achieved artificially and do not affect the quality of color rendering in any way.

Everyone knows that LCD monitors have a limited viewing angle. Depending on our position towards the monitor, the image may change colors and become difficult to distinguish. If you plan to use the computer alone, then you can always adjust the position of the monitor to suit you. However, for example, viewing photos or a movie with friends may be difficult on monitors with a narrow viewing angle, so we recommend choosing a monitor with a viewing angle of at least 160 degrees vertically and horizontally.

Please note that the monitor can be adjusted vertically and horizontally. Otherwise, even in monitors with a good viewing angle, the image will be slightly distorted. In addition, most modern LCD monitors have the ability to mount on a wall, which can significantly free up your work space. Sometimes a wall mount is included in the original package. Before buying a monitor, we recommend that you think about whether you will hang the monitor on the wall (less than 5 percent of users do this), or whether it is better to choose a monitor without this option and it is not worth overpaying for this addition (especially since you can always buy a wall mount separately)?

As for the color of the display, we will not give any recommendations on which monitor to choose, because the design itself is a matter of taste for each of us. It should be written that most often you can find LCD monitors on sale in black and silver colors. Some models are available in white. Buy an LCD monitor in Kharkov other colors (blue, gold, etc.) will be problematic. Sometimes monitor buyers also wonder what the difference is between glossy and matte monitor surfaces, and which one is better. Gloss has more a bright picture, however, any light will be reflected from such a monitor, which will not be very convenient when working, so it is preferable for working in a dark room (for example, in a computer club). But LCD monitors with a matte surface (with anti-reflective coating) have a less juicy picture, but do not create discomfort during operation. It's a matter of everyone's taste here.

Tip #10. Do you really need additional options?

Before you pay attention to the presence of various add-ons in the monitor, you should think carefully about whether you are ready to overpay for it, or whether it is better to buy a monitor without frills. Among the add-ons, manufacturers usually offer a built-in TV tuner and speakers. Availability of USB and FireWire ports are convenient for connecting external devices (players, cameras, external drives, web cameras, etc.) directly to the monitor.

The built-in TV tuner and speakers turn your monitor into a full-fledged TV. However, monitors with such an addition have disadvantages: for example, if the acoustics break down, you will have to carry the entire monitor for repairs, and it is no longer possible to update such built-in speakers. Of course, implement urgent repair of computers and monitors not a problem today, but the monitor is the least susceptible part of the computer to update.

Additional tip. Repair and maintenance. Pah-pah, so as not to jinx it!

Before buying a monitor, make sure that there is a corresponding one from this manufacturer, for example, samsung, lg, acer, benq, viewsonic, syncmaster, nec, asus, philips, sony, dell, hp , belinea (belinia), samtron, acer (acer), aoc (ak), hanns-g (hans) etc. A situation may arise that by contacting the store under warranty, your LCD monitor will be sent to the official Kiev SC. It would seem that what’s wrong with this?! But in practice, instead of the legal 14 days for repairs, it takes 1.5-2 months of feeding breakfast. Therefore, you need to eat urgent repairs lcd monitor - feel free to contact us. Because sometimes it’s better to pay 100 UAH and receive a monitor in 30-40 minutes than to wait 2 months and eventually hear: “ This is not a warranty case«.