Administration of cms. Unification and mass production

Hello, dear readers. Today we will talk about what a CMS (Content Management System) is, what CMS there are, and which one to choose to create your own website.

So, let's try to formulate a definition. CMS or Content Management System- This shell, allowing users who do not know HTML basics, CSS and PHP to place your materials on the site and, subsequently, manage them. All CMS have a user-friendly interface, so anyone who is at least a little familiar with a computer can learn to fill a website with content (materials) in a few hours, and even create their own websites in a few days!

Now let's talk about what types of content management systems there are. All CMS can be divided into paid And free. The main and most important advantage of paid CMS is a complete technical support. This means that at any time you can call or write to the specialists who were involved in the development of the CMS and ask all the questions you are interested in, to which you should subsequently receive competent and detailed answers. Another very important advantage of paid CMS is that you buy a fully configured and ready-to-use product that does not require any outside intervention in the settings, which cannot be said about free systems ah content management. In other words, after installing this CMS on the server, you can immediately begin creating a site, and this site will correctly perform its functions. For example, if you create an online store, then all purchasing, payment and delivery functions will definitely work correctly, and you will not need to change anything in the settings, much less in the source code.

The main advantage of free content management systems is that they are free. Plus, on the Internet big number free plugins, modules and templates for these CMS, with which you can create a website of absolutely any complexity. But there is one BUT. You will have to deal with all this variety of add-ons yourself. And if you are going to make a more or less serious website on demon paid CMS, then you can’t do without basic knowledge HTML, CSS, and maybe PHP.

If we take the same online store as an example, its development on a paid CMS will take a novice user about a week. The same store on a free content management system will have to be developed in at least three weeks (read how to set up a website traffic counter).

Thus, if you have a lot of free time, have computer skills, the desire and interest to work hard, then there is every chance to create a website that will not be inferior in beauty and functionality to projects created on paid CMS.

Now let’s look at the main types of paid and free CMS. I’ll say right away that this is not a list of all content management systems, but only the most popular and frequently used ones.

Free

1. Joomla! Perhaps the most popular demon today paid system content management. It has many modules, plugins and add-ons. There are a lot of lessons, articles and documentation in Russian on the Internet on working in this system. Everything would be fine, but Joomla! too “heavy” - has a lot of unnecessary things that load the system. Plus, Joomla! creates a lot of duplicate pages, which is not very good for promotion.
2. WordPress. Another equally popular system. Initially, it was developed for creating blogs. But as practice has shown, with using WordPress you can create corporate websites, including online stores. Many free plugins have also been created for WordPress, and you can find documentation in Russian on the Internet.
3. Drupal. Another free content management system. To a large extent, it is a news engine. Suitable for creating online communities, forums or blogs. But if you wish, you can create absolutely any website on it.
4. Ucoz. Everything is quite simple here. To create a website, you just need to register on the official Ucoz website. You don't even need to know HTML. Ucoz is a website builder in the truest sense of the word. In addition, you don’t even have to spend money on hosting, ucoz will provide it. Is it true Domain name will be next – yoursite.ucoz.ru.
5. PHPShop. CMSFree. Completely free open source engine source code. On the developer's website you can find templates and modules that are attached to the CMS. Suitable for creating commercial corporate websites, and the most interesting thing is that you can create online stores. Technical support is organized in the form of a forum.
6. WolfCMS. An actively developing CMS, distributed under Free Software terms and published under the GNU General Public License v.3. It is written, like most modern engines, in PHP. The main advantage of this system is that it does not require resources and is very lightweight. Those who like to experiment will like it, since the source code of the site is visible directly in the admin panel. True, for normal operation it will require some knowledge of HTML and PHP.
7. OpenCMS. A free engine created by a group of European developers that is suitable for professional website development. Like Wolf CMS, there are not many ready-made modules and templates, so, for the most part, you will have to do everything yourself. Quite fast and secure system.

Paid

1. 1C-Bitrix. Very popular, probably the most popular paid content management system today. If a basic license can be purchased for 1,990 rubles, then the “fattest configuration” will cost as much as 249,900 rubles! The difference in the cost of versions lies in the presence of certain modules. So, with a basic license you can create, at most, a business card website. And in order to create an online store you will need a license of about fifty thousand. But this is not a lot of money for an organization, so professional website developers actively use this CMS.
2. NetCat. Another popular paid Russian engine. To use it, you do not require any special knowledge of programming languages ​​or markup. The system implements various functionalities, for example, interactive communication with site visitors. This CMS costs much less than Bitrix. Full version Netcat systems will cost you 32,200 rubles.
3. UMI. CMS. A “boxed” CMS that allows you to manage your site and content without logging into the administrative interface. Thus, according to the developers, even a child can administer the site. In reality, everything turns out to be not so simple. Problems begin already at the stage of installation on hosting - you will have to suffer a little to install this system. And the interface is not very friendly. The most expensive license for such a content management system will cost 29,900 rubles.
4. DataLifeEngine. Not a bad news engine. It's cheap - $59 basic and $78 advanced version. You can find enough extension modules to create a feature-rich website. Very well optimized for promotion - SEO specialists can take note. True, there are some security problems. You can use the free demo version, only with some restrictions - the source code is closed, there is a limit on the number of news and comments.
5. HostCMS. A commercial content management system that has several licensing options, including a free version. The free version does not have the following modules: site search, forms, backup, site users, file manager, forums, advertising and several others. But there is an online store module! In my opinion, it is worth taking a closer look at this CMS. By the way, the most expensive license will cost 29,900 rubles.
6. Amiro. CMS. The developers position this system as the fastest CMS on the RuNet. The system allows you to create and maintain websites of any level of complexity. One of the features of this CMS can be considered quick setup. So, with a ready-made template, you can build a website in a few hours. The most expensive edition costs 23,990 rubles.

OK it's all over Now. I specifically did not single out any one CMS from the list, considering it the best. Any system has its advantages and disadvantages, and for different people they are different meaning. If you are interested public opinion, then you can use statistical data. So, the most popular free system is Joomla(see how to change the logo in Joomla), and paid - 1C-Bitrix. But maybe for someone the determining factor is the page loading speed, and he can write modules with extensions himself. Then Joomla definitely won’t suit him.

Therefore, this article is just food for thought. I hope that after reading it, you will better navigate the huge variety of CMS.

Also read on this topic:

How to check a website for viruses? How to change logo in Joomla?
CCleaner 4.14 – optimization of system operation without problems
How to recover or reset Joomla admin password How to create correct file robots.txt for a WordPress site

Thanks to today's web technologies, almost anyone can create their own website. Knowledge of programming and hypertext markup is not required. In this article, we will take a detailed look at website content management and give a rating of CMSs that are the most profitable of all existing platforms.

Concept of CMS

A site content management system is specialized software that is designed to quickly modify site news and manage other elements of its content. Such a system can be released as a desktop client or as an Internet application.

CMS allows you not only to edit news in automatic mode, but also create new content, add elements of stylistic design and user functionality. The main functions and capabilities that all content management systems have:

1. The ability to manage content without using hypertext markup language and cascading style sheets.
2. Data storage, providing access to site databases, managing document flows.
3. Publishing content.
4. Providing a convenient search subsystem for site content.

Rating of free CMS

Free versions of CMS have much less functionality than paid options, but they provide basic set functions that are necessary for basic management of all content on your site.

1. (Malware Free). This system is in most cases used for news portals, because the functionality is minimal. However, this does not prevent this system from creating sites with convenient user navigation. All documentation is distributed free of charge. The client application is available for download to anyone who wants to create their own blog or news portal. This CMS gives site owners the opportunity to connect advertising and other monetization systems. The function of storing information in a database is supported.
2. WordPress is one of the most popular and in-demand systems today. Also included in the rating of CMS with the most convenient distribution of functions. WordPress requires a pre-installed client. Such a system is usually used to create complex information resources that require a complex organization of ongoing support large quantity administrators.
3. Typo3. This version of the CMS is used to create a system distributed free of charge and open source. Availability of high-quality documentation translated into different languages, allows developers to maintain the site and implement its functionality Hi-tech in the field of web programming.

Rating of CMS online stores

The most productive CMS

1. Opencart. After the personal one, it will be able to spend a minimum of resources and allow the site to work much faster.
2. "1C Bitrix". The engine allows you to manage an online store with more than a hundred thousand products of different categories. At the same time, the overall performance of the site does not suffer.
3. Magento. This engine works stably. The risk of constant system freezes or crashes is minimal.

Internet magazine management system

These engine options are perfect for novice bloggers or for those who decide to start own internet magazine without knowledge of web development.

1. +Web. It is one of the individual website content management systems. Allows you to create a custom design for your blog.
2. Treegraph. Suitable for the development of any Internet projects, in particular blogs. Supports Apache and mySQL database.
3. WordPress. A convenient engine that is included in the general CMS rating.
4. Drupal. Allows you to build absolutely any subtype of online magazines, regardless of their level of complexity.

Paid website content management systems. Are they worth using?

Before choosing a paid engine, try its free version for at least one month. This way you'll know if it's right for you this system. The paid version of the engine provides many more functions, for example, third-party advertising will be disabled, and from now on only the administrator will be able to connect advertising banners, which will bring money to the site owner.

Paid systems have an increased level of security, which is an extremely important criterion if you are planning to create a serious web resource. When choosing an engine, be guided not by generally accepted stereotypes, but by your experience of using the free version of a particular product.

In the beginning there was only hypertext - a simple ten commands (“tags”) for text markup that turned ordinary text into a website. And the few “layout gods” could, in ten minutes, text editor create a simple website. But this suited everyone, because own computer in Moscow, reading information on a website in New York a couple of minutes after it was published - it was really cool.

Websites have become more complex

However, information tends to grow, and exponentially - its volume in the modern world doubles in approximately 5 years. Besides this rapid spread data put their relevance at the forefront: whoever published it first received the main stream of readers. Websites have become more complex, and the method of manual entry - with markup, paragraphs, headings, illustrations - in terms of labor costs has become comparable to hewing copies of the 10 commandments in stone.

The programming fraternity tried to solve the problem by improving website layout programs, including visual editors - but this was no longer enough.

If the site owner needed to make changes - for example, add a banner or a new button to the site menu, then doing this for, say, 10 pages was labor-intensive, but still possible. But the number of pages on the site began to be measured in the thousands. Repeat the same operation a thousand times? What if the banner has lost its relevance and needs to be removed – a thousand more times? And then you still need to connect via FTP and download all the new versions of the pages. Sorry, but this is too much.

How can non-programmers fill out a website?

In addition, it was logical to allow people who did not have programming skills and did not know hypertext (HTML) and layout to fill the sites - for example, journalists, doctors, small businesses, employees social services. And if a non-specialist is even taught simple techniques (although his head should actually hurt about something else: about the content, about relevance, about the truthfulness of the text, and not where to put a tag to highlight a paragraph or in which folder on the server to put new page) – then the probability technical errors increases sharply, and this is the loss of the “face” of the site in the literal sense.

Let there be a CMS!

The emergence of the Content Management System (CMS) became an obvious solution to the above problems. With the introduction of a CMS, a significant amount of manual labor was eliminated: now the addition of some element of the site was automatically distributed to all (necessary) pages and sections, except that a technically untrained specialist (content manager) could independently post materials or make simple changes without touching layout, loading and unloading pages and generally not knowing what FTP is.
This dramatically expanded the audience of people who could now post information on the Internet.

Appearing at the beginning of 2000, the first CMS were strictly individual and were written for each site separately, so not everyone could afford it.

So what is a CMS, or the back side of a website?

Generally speaking, this visual editor site transferred online, with access distribution and general management site files.

That is, this is a set of programs located together with the site on hosting - in the place where the site files are physically located - and at the same time allowing:

• create and manage the content of the site;
• populate the website for staff without technical training;
• perform data processing operations;
• distribute levels of access to the site;
• use ready-made modules and applications to expand the functionality of the site.

CMS gave a tremendous advantage to working with websites, and, quite naturally, they moved from individual development to mass production. CMS appeared that could be used for many sites, the phrase “site engine” and the question “what CMS is your site on?” came into use. Static websites are almost a thing of the past.

"Admin"

Most of us related to the Internet have at least once been to the “admin panel” - the part of the site that actually serves to manage this very site: posting texts, adding/deleting products, etc.

This should not be confused with " personal account» – part of the site, which is intended for registered users. Despite password access, it is still on the “front” side of the site. Administrator - back side with limited access only for our own.

But this is not yet a CMS - this is also a result CMS work, an interface specially designed for site administrators.

Unification and mass production

What are the advantages of unification? After all, it would seem that a control system written specifically for a specific site, for specific tasks and taking into account all the nuances and subtleties should be better than the “industrial” version?

In some cases this is certainly true. But this most likely applies to very simple sites, with rare and minor changes in content, or, conversely, very specific tasks that cannot or are difficult to solve standard methods. Most sites, with all due respect, are essentially the same type: corporate business card, online store, blog, etc. Solutions and inventions migrate from one site to another, successful ones become trends, unsuccessful ones die out.

Now imagine that the site owner needs to add a new feature that competitors already have:

• this can be done either by the developers of a “home-written” CMS, and then the site owner is strictly tied to them;
• or a third-party organization, and then it will take a long time, and not necessarily successfully, to understand someone else’s structure and code;
• or full-time programmers of the corporation itself, but in any case they will have to create a “trick” from scratch.

Many programmers can work with unified CMS, and updates or additional modules are distributed quite quickly, and often free of charge. By the way, about payment.

To pay or not to pay?

There are some nuances that need to be discussed right away:

• Free does not mean “poor quality”; open source CMSs are supported by thousands of programmers around the world, and there are a minimum of errors.
• Free does not mean “completely free”. The site owner will have to pay for the work of programmers, for additional modules (plugins), for changes in design, and often for a template (ready-made solution).
• Paid means not so much paying for yourself software package, how much for technical support, updates, documentation, etc. By paying the cost of a CMS once and then refusing support and updates, for example, you can get an option cheaper than choosing a free CMS with modifications. But this is a rather exceptional case.

So to pay or not to pay?

Free CMS

The “Big Three” here look like this: WordPress, Joomla, Drupal. According to our CMS checking service, the ratio of their use looks approximately like this: 43% -28% -4%.

Advantages of free systems:

• free;
• extensibility;
• large selection of contractors.

Flaws:

• there is no official technical support and systematic documentation;
• insufficient reliability for critical sites;
• Setting up and especially expanding capabilities requires technical knowledge.

Generally, free CMS may be suitable for simple stores, blogs, web versions of media, and simple corporate sites.

Paid CMS

Here, 1C-Bitrix actually has a monopoly share of 50%, followed by NetCat (14%) and HostCMS (9%) by a wide margin.

Whether this is caused by the undeniable advantage of 1C-Bitrix in quality or a well-chosen business model is a debatable question, and we will not consider it here.

Advantages of commercial CMS:

• high reliability;
• high level of protection (security);
• excellent functionality;
• Availability of full technical support and official documentation.

Flaws:

• high starting price for the CMS itself;
• a limited circle of contractors (but, as a rule, certified);
• complexity of the structure and increased hardware requirements.

What to choose?

So what to choose from all the variety? Naturally, we need to proceed from the tasks facing the future site. An important factor in the choice is the availability of contractor-programmers specializing in this system.

And also clearly understand the capabilities of the chosen CMS for future expansion, keeping in mind that with the launch of the site, work on it is just beginning.

Tweet

Plus

Please enable JavaScript to view the

A modern website is no longer just a set of pages with links between them (as it was ten years ago), but a full-fledged one software, which tracks user actions, allows them to communicate with each other and offers a variety of useful services depending on the tasks set by the site owner. In development similar system Impressive sums of money are invested. Often the budget of a large corporate website is comparable to the budget of a small company. The tasks of administration, management and functionality are solved by the so-called “Content Management Systems” (CMS). There are already plenty of both paid and free systems written. In this article, we will look at the most popular of them in terms of functionality, ease of use for users and administrators, and also pay attention to the load on the server when operating these CMSs.

Data Life Engine (DLE)

The commercial CMS Data Life Engine has undeservedly earned a bad reputation. At the same time, the developers are absolutely not to blame for this. They created optimal system for publishing news and articles.

Let's look at the main features of DLE:

• creation of an unlimited number of categories and sections for news
• differentiation of access rights between users
• simplicity and convenience of publishing materials
• convenient admin panel
• technically competent Russification
• small size Database
• convenient connection of design templates
• opportunity Reserve copy and restore the database from the admin panel
• built-in CNC page addresses in several formats

From a website developer's point of view, DLE is somewhat clumsy. There are a sufficient number of modules that expand the functionality of the system, but they are all aimed at developing the main task, that is, publishing news materials. At the same time, installing a module is not an easy task. Man, don't knowledgeable layout and web programming is unlikely to cope with this task. Many developers manage to create quite complex non-news projects using Data Life Engine. However, if you think logically, it is better for such purposes not to take DLE, but something more flexible in functional terms. For example, Joomla or Drupal.

Why does Data Life Engine get such a bad reputation? Everything is very simple. The engine’s protection was broken long ago, and 99% of its functionality is used by careless webmasters on sites with pirated software and adult portals. Although, in fact, the engine is very stable and high quality. With proper configuration and optimization, the load on the server is minimal.

Drupal is not only a content management system in the classical sense of the term. This is more of a core, on the basis of which you can build almost unlimited functionality of the site. Need a news portal? No problem! We collect the necessary modules and get a portal with news. Need a file directory? We follow the same principle and get a fully functional catalog.

Thousands of websites are built on this system. Here are the main areas of development in Drupal:

• blogs
• social media
• personal sites
• corporate websites
• community portals
• forums
• the shops
• directory sites

Drupal is considered one of the most reliable systems today. At the same time, a huge advantage of this CMS is that it is absolutely free to use. There is a Russian-speaking Drupal community where you will always get the help you need technical assistance and will tell you how to solve problems using this content management system.

The disadvantages of using Drupal include a slight complexity in operation. A man without basic knowledge web programming is unlikely to be able to use the most powerful functionality of the system. The load on the server depends on the functionality that you create yourself. But it is no different from similar CMS.

This core contains several CMS of the same type, which are called the “Nuke family”. All these systems are no different in terms of functionality from Drupal, only their development and expansion capabilities are somewhat limited.

The author is Francisco Bursi, the system is distributed completely free of charge, but subject to copyright. From a historical point of view, Php-Nuke has become a pioneer among CMS developed. This is the only reason why it can be respected, but today dictates completely different requirements for the security and stability of the system. Nuke adapts poorly to these changes.

Php-Nuke loads the server quite heavily and is not optimized for database queries, so it is better not to create projects with high traffic on this CMS: either the server or the server owners will not be able to handle it.

Php-Nuke has holes through which your site can easily be broken. Developers offer patches from time to time, but they are unlikely to cover all existing gaps.

Despite all the shortcomings, Php-Nuke may well be useful for novice developers to learn skills in working with a CMS. Installation, configuration and administration are very simple, even the average school student can understand them.

E107

Several years ago this system made a powerful statement. Many webmasters have switched to using e107 in their projects. It cannot be said that the transition was justified. Let's take a closer look at this system.

The first thing that catches your eye is the abundance of possibilities of the E107. You can build almost anything on this CMS: from a personal blog to a corporate website. But this functionality hides the main problem: the E107 assembly most often does not require installation additional components to expand functionality. All of them are already available in the distribution. And with a distribution size of 4.5 megabytes, what are the developers neglecting? Right! Safety and ease of use.

The admin panel is poorly thought out; you often have to think about what this or that option, this or that module is responsible for. And it is sometimes extremely difficult to understand all this without communicating on thematic forums.

A few words should be said about the design of your website, built on e107. There is a large number ready-made templates, both paid and free, which you can safely use in the design of your project. But in most cases, site owners want to see a unique design, right? This is where a huge disappointment awaits: developing a template for the E107 is a difficult and thankless task. Information is displayed separately from each module, which makes it very difficult to change the design of the site. Open any module file with information output and you will be simply shocked by the readability of the code. The code is absolutely unreadable! It simply confuses a beginner, but an experienced developer begins to think about the advisability of choosing e107 as a content management system for the task at hand.

Slaed

Commercial content management system Slaed has captured a significant segment of the market and has no intention of letting it go. As with all commercial systems, functionality and safety are put first. The classic system of expanding functionality by installing modules also works here.

It turns out that the paid version differs from the free version of Open Slaed not very much (and does not differ from similar CMS at all). The authors include in the price the removal of copyrights, expansion of functionality through paid modules, optimization of system operation, as well as replacement graphic design. On top of all this wealth, it offers free updates and technical support for one year, as well as the ability to install Slaed on four domains. Don't you think that this is not enough for the user to shell out 200 euros from his pocket? Especially considering that all this can be obtained for free from other developers.

In my subjective opinion, it is the leader among CMS. Created on Joomla great amount a wide variety of sites. The system allows you to create business card sites, online stores, portals, communities, blog systems, bulletin boards, corporate multilingual sites and many, many other sites.

It is completely free, has many modules for expanding functionality (they have different names “modules”, “components”, “mambots” and are aimed at solving various tasks). Using these modules, you can add an online store to your company’s website in just a few minutes! At the same time, you get a reliable store that will work stably.

Changing the design for Joomla is not a problem. A huge number of ready-made templates have been created that are suitable for almost any website. And for lovers of unique design, everything here is also well thought out: a template for CMS Joomla is created very simply. To be fair, it is worth noting that a person who is far from web technologies and does not have knowledge of layout and programming cannot cope with this.

The convenience of Joomla is that there are practically no non-standard modules and components in the standard distribution. Developers' entire focus is on convenience and safety.

It’s very difficult to come up with a task that Joomla can’t handle!

And finally, a few words about blogs. Probably all of us know about the existence of Live Journals, and many actively use them. The Live Journal service has both its advantages (the ability to read friends’ feeds, exchange messages, etc.) and disadvantages: loaded with advertising, insufficient functionality, inability to earn money from maintaining your journal. Now there is a solution for all the disadvantages!

Free CMS for blogging, considered the best in the world. Functionality are not inferior to, and often surpass, the famous Live Journals. With WordPress you can easily publish video files from various resources, create a photographer’s blog with a demonstration of work, a musician’s blog with online audio examples. Or you can simply write down your thoughts and feelings in a kind of online diary. By the way, many famous people in Lately prefer to blog. This is believed to contribute to their popularity.

The functionality, as in all other CMSs, is expanded by installing additional plugins. This is extremely easy to do, just like working with the WordPress system. It’s worth mentioning the famous “three-step” WordPress installation. Blogging isn't the only thing WordPress is used for. You can build portals and photo galleries, article catalogs and product showcases on it.

To summarize this short review I would like to advise you to choose exactly the content management system that can best suit a specific task. Then you will save both time and money on website development.

The article was updated on January 18, 2018 and is completely current.
Almost every beginner is faced with the question choosing a CMS for your website or blog. This is understandable, because it is impossible to know everything in advance. Yes and various systems There are already quite a lot of content management options. IN this review collected only free solutions. They are in no way inferior paid analogues, and sometimes even compare favorably with their background. After all, to make amendments to open source much simpler, therefore all found vulnerabilities are fixed faster. And also all new and bold ideas appear here first.

To begin with, we should conditionally divide systems according to their focus. There are CMS designed exclusively for creating blogs, as well as more flexible systems that allow you to create full-fledged websites and media portals. At the same time, blogging systems can be designed to create a whole series of projects, for example, for an entire enterprise. It is also worth noting the development period of the platform (the longer it is, the better the system is developed and contains fewer errors), the presence of a community (it will help if difficulties arise in installing, debugging or using the system), performance (not all systems are suitable for high-load projects). so, Now let's look at each CMS in more detail.

Official site .

This is one of the fairly old and well-proven engines. It is great for e-commerce and selling products online. Many plugins, such as VirtueMart, allow you to open a store very quickly and in a short time. True, to understand everything from scratch, you will have to spend a little time reading manuals, reading documentation and forums. Fortunately, Joomla has a very good support and a huge community in several languages, including Russian.

The advantages of the system include the presence of the following functions “out of the box”:

• user authentication, including through OpenID;
• visual article editor;
• convenient file management;
• comment system and protection against spam in them;
• manager of plugins and extensions.

In fact, there are many more advantages; it is very difficult to simply list them all in one article. That is why it occupies a leading position in CMS ratings and tops. But there are some drawbacks: thanks to its flexibility and many settings, a beginner will have to spend more than one day understanding all this diversity. Also, its functionality may be redundant for many simple business card sites. But it is suitable for online stores and product displays.

TYPO3

Official site .

Not long ago, a fairly old CMS, TYPO3, began to gain popularity on the Internet, and now it is firmly entrenched in the TOP 5. The site structure here is represented by a tree of pages. On each of them there can be located standard elements content: text, pictures, tables, etc. This content management system is based on templates that you can either download ready-made or write yourself in TypoScript.

Pros of TYPO3:

• opportunity fine tuning user rights;
• ease of maintaining several sites at the same time;
• ability to use extensions from TER (TYPO3 extension repository);
• high safety requirements;
• advanced text editor with spell check, preview, change history.

Disadvantages of this system:

• the difficulty of editing the site structure using a template engine;
• slow rendering large pages with a variety of content (tables, pictures);
• few ready-made solutions for online stores

Recommended for use within large industrial companies and banks. It will most likely not be suitable for young and small sites, or the costs of development and support will be disproportionate to the benefits of use.

Drupal

Official site .

It is also a very popular and widespread CMS, which is used to create websites by very large enterprises, for example, Sony Music. They choose Drupal because of its wide range of functions for building both internal and external websites for corporate network. There is a huge database of tools for managing a single user base. Well suited for organizing a system of blogs and forums. Drupal has a very active developer community, a huge knowledge base, and a live forum. You can find answers to questions about installation and deployment of sites and modules quite simply.

Advantages of Drupal:

• excellent support from the user and developer community;
• more than 6000 modules that facilitate the expansion of functionality;
• Easily manage user rights, create collective blogs and forums.

Disadvantages of the system:

• may be overly complex for simple sites;
• total lack of beautiful and functional themes;
• difficult to learn for an untrained user.

For business card websites, choosing this CMS is categorically not recommended, but for organizing medium and large portals where users will add their material and comment on it, Drupal is suitable like no other.

MODX

Official site .

One of the youngest CMS (development has been going on since 2004), which appeared at the very beginning of the formation of the so-called Web 2.0. The idea was to involve users in editing and adding content to the site. For example, writing reviews, reviews and even entire articles. Therefore it is present here good system user registration, site search using AJAX (without reloading the page), you can quickly expand the news feed, and a collective blog. The disadvantages include common problems with Russian encoding, which have not been fully resolved, although they appeared a long time ago; lack of ready-made modules and solutions for organizing a gallery, forum, or electronic store.

WordPress

Official site .

If anyone still doubts that WordPress has long outgrown the “blogging system” stage, then these doubts should be cast aside. A great variety of websites are developed on this CMS, including social networks, company websites, online stores and product displays, forums, as well as simple business card sites.

With thousands of ready-made themes, plugins and even ready-made assemblies for different needs, WordPress takes a well-deserved place in the TOP 5. There is an active developer community that generates lessons and information materials.

Advantages of WordPress:

• large developer community and well-structured documentation;
• thousands of free plugins and themes for the site;
• convenient admin panel.

Disadvantages of WordPress

• the starting functionality immediately after installation is quite modest, you need to supplement it with at least 4-5 plugins;
• After a simple installation, some security improvements are needed.

In fact, this is one of the simplest and most beginner-friendly systems. It allows you to create websites without understanding anything about programming (read mine). Highly recommended as your first CMS. In the future, if its functionality turns out to be limited for you, then you can easily transfer the site to another engine of your choice.
[In most cases, the top ones are occupied by these 5 CMS, which I reviewed in this article.

When answering the question “which CMS to choose for a website,” you should pay attention to the fact that popular engines are constantly under attack. Their code is open for use by everyone, including not entirely honest people who can look for vulnerabilities in it and use them for their own selfish purposes. The danger can be avoided if the engine is updated in a timely manner. latest version. At the same time, if you use a less common content management system, then if difficulties arise, you may have nowhere to find help and can only rely on yourself. Take this factor into account as well. Good luck!