Rating of paid cms. Does the choice of CMS affect promotion?

There are dozens of great CMSs. Regardless of the type of site you're building, there's likely to be one or two that are perfect for your needs.

The problem is that most designers and developers don't want to learn a bunch of dozens of different CMSs. As a rule, everything is limited to one or two, which are used to build all sites. This approach means that the options used must have both flexibility and powerful functionality.

The CMS listed below fully meet the above requirements. The first three, WordPress, Joomla! and Drupal are the best on our list. The remaining seven have a good combination of features, ease of use and support.

Try them, maybe something will be perfect for solving your problems.

Free, uses PHP

A couple of years ago there was a lot of discussion about whether it should be considered a true CMS or just a blogging platform. By now, the controversy has subsided on its own, as WordPress has demonstrated its functionality in a fairly wide range of different websites, ranging from simple multi-page brochures to full-fledged social networks (using plugins like BuddyPress).

There are thousands of themes available for use in WordPress, thousands of plugins and widgets that extend its functionality. WordPress also has an active developer community that generates tutorials and informational materials on all aspects of using the CMS.

With the help of plugins and themes, a WordPress site can be turned into a social network, forum, online store, and much more. It has built-in blog functionality, and it is also possible to build several sites using a single core of the system.

Strengths

• Large developer community with well-developed documentation and training materials.
• Free and commercial plugins and themes that open up the opportunity to implement almost any website idea.
• Convenient control panel for content and appearance.

Flaws

• May be overly complex for simple sites
• Standard installation is vulnerable to attacks
• No official support outside forums where you may not get an answer to your question.

Free, uses PHP

Used by several well-known companies as the CMS of their sites, such as MTV, Harvard University, and IHOP. It is also suitable as the basis for an intranet, such as that used by Citibank.

Joomla! has a long history of development and an active developer community (more than 200,000 users and active participants), so it is quite easy to find information and lessons on this system. There are also a huge number of plugins and add-ons for Joomla!, so expanding the functionality is done without coding.

Despite a large number of Joomla! themes, the quality of most of them is inferior to WordPress themes.

Strengths

• User authentication can be done using OpenID, Google, LDAP, and many other methods.
• More than 7000 extensions
• Active community of users and developers, lots of available documentation.

Flaws

• The control panel is not as simple as other CMSs.
• Fewer high-quality themes compared to other CMSs.

Free, uses PHP

Another popular CMS that is used by well-known companies, for example, New York Observer, Popular Science, MIT, Sony Music, Fast Company. It has a large set of functions for building internal and external sites, as well as a huge toolkit for organizing content.

Drupal has a very active community of users and developers, with a large number of IRC channels and forums available. There are even conferences dedicated to Drupal. There is also continually updated and improved documentation generated by the community. In it you can find answers to questions about installation, building sites and modules, developing themes, and so on.

There are over 6,000 add-ons (“modules”) that make it easy to extend Drupal's functionality. This way you can concentrate on creating the design and content rather than coding special features.

Strengths

• Excellent support from the user and developer community, including IRC channels and conferences.
• More than 6,000 modules to make it easy to expand Drupal functionality.
• A large number of companies offering commercial support for Drupal sites.

Weak sides

• May be overly complex for simple sites.
• Not enough high quality free and commercial themes available.
• The structure of the topic is quite complex.

From $99.95 to $299.95 depending on license, PHP is used

An interesting hybrid of commercial and free software. The core code for the ExpressionEngine core is built on CodeIgniter, which is a free working PHP environment. But the commercial aspect of a CMS means that developers and technical support focused exclusively on ExpressionEngine.

ExpressionEngine doesn't have as many add-ons and plugins as other CMSs. There are only 22 modules and just under 100 official plugins. But they cover most commonly used features such as wiki, forum, user management, mailing lists, e-commerce, statistics and others. There are also unofficial plugins that expand the functionality of the CMS. But the range of built-in features in ExpressionEngine is impressive in its own right.

Strengths

• Commercial support
• Focused on security, most problems in this area are absent.

Flaws

• High price, especially for commercial sites.
• May be overly complex for simple sites.
• There is no interactive demo available before purchasing the system.

Free, uses PHP

Probably the most overlooked CMS. TextPattern is a very flexible CMS, although it is very easy to use for both the designer and developer. It uses a tagging system to manage content. TextPattern uses Textile to convert text into correct XHTML code, making it much easier for less-skilled users to work with.

TextPattern doesn't have that huge amount themes and templates like WordPress, Drupal, or Joomla!. There are just over 120 themes available. They also offer themes for the admin panel to customize it for use by site content authors.

Has about 700 plugins and 50 modules for TextPattern. Plugin categories include image galleries, navigation, e-commerce, custom fields, archives, and so on. Modules and plugins significantly expand the functionality of TextPattern and can turn it into a more powerful CMS.

Strengths

• Very simple interface
• Great for sites of all sizes.
• Excellent documentation, including online manuals.

Flaws

• Small developer community
• Much fewer plugins compared to popular CMSs.
• A small number of high quality themes.

Contao (formerly TYPOlight)

Free, uses PHP

It has a user interface that uses Ajax features and other Web 2.0 features to improve usability. It has advanced content editing features, including editing multiple posts at once and rolling back to a previous version.

Contao also has several built-in modules. The calendar module supports multiple calendars with different events and integration with RSS or Atom. The built-in mailing module supports HTML and plain text email formats. You can import a list of recipient addresses from CSV file and personalize emails. The built-in news/blog module supports categories, archives, highlighted posts, comments and is integrated with RSS or Atom. There are also many additional modules available that significantly expand the functionality of Contao.

There are very few premium and free themes available for Contao. But such a situation will not be a hindrance for a designer planning to create a website from scratch, since Contao has a built-in CSS library.

Strengths

• There are no restrictions on website design.
• Easy to learn for authors and content editors.
• Good built-in modules.

Flaws

• There are very few CMS themes available.
• The configuration tool is quite clumsy and poorly designed.
• Due to the presence of a poor administration tool, it is suitable for small sites and a small number of pages.

Free, uses PHP

CMS with open source code, which is great for developers and designers with good coding skills. There are recipes and lessons for beginner developers, a large set of modules for various functions (blog, forms, forum, and so on). Designers can use custom HTML and CSS code when creating websites. Multi-page templates are also supported.

SilverStripe is also a powerful tool for managing the editing process of website content. You can set your own approval process, publish and unpublish articles on certain dates, and set different access levels. Such a system can be very useful if the site has many authors for whom access is limited only to certain sections.

SilverStripe has a large community of users and developers. In addition, you can find commercial support from various companies around the world.

Strengths

• An excellent system for restricting access to sections of the site.
• Designers can use HTML and CSS when developing websites.
• The development is based on open source code.

Flaws

• Not everything is intuitive in the settings panel.
• There are only about 150 extensions/modules.
• There are few high quality themes available.

Free, uses .NET

Gives the designer full control over the website creation process. Eat starter kit shells, which simplifies the process of mastering the system. It's also easy to integrate Flash Silverlight content into your website. There are many famous sites built on Umbraco, for example, the sites of the Heinz company and the ABBA group.

Umbraco makes content management easy with a tree-based view of your site. Version numbers, publication schedules and preview material. One of the advantages of Umbraco is great job with content created in Microsoft Word, which may be a deciding factor for users who use Microsoft work Office.

Umbraco is an open API that allows developers to easily access various functions systems.

Strengths

• Free and paid lessons for support.
• Powerful system for websites and intranet solutions.
• Open API

Flaws

• Major add-ons are paid.
• There is no demonstration of the system.
• There are no truly complete themes for a website.

Free, uses PHP

It is not only a powerful CMS, but also working environment for creating web applications. Website development can be done at different levels. you can start with a theme and then change the styles without affecting the code. Or you can create your own theme with using HTML and CSS. If there are no problems with editing PHP, then you can create a custom template.

One of the advantages of concrete5 is the context editor. The developers tried to reproduce the functionality of a word processor, which makes it easier to edit pages while viewing. The result is a very easy-to-use tool that allows people who are far from programming to manage the content of the site.

The concrete5 developer community is growing faster than others. There are many themes and add-ons with support.

Strengths

• Easy conversion of HTML website to concrete5.
• Active and growing community of users and developers.
• There is business-level hosting that offers website maintenance.

Flaws

• Many interesting plugins are expensive.
• Almost all best themes paid.
• Paid support is expensive unless you use their hosting (from $125).

The article was updated on January 18, 2018 and is completely current.
Almost every beginner is faced with the question of choosing a CMS for their website or blog. This is understandable, because it is impossible to know everything in advance. And quite a lot of different content management systems have already appeared. IN this review collected only free solutions. They are in no way inferior paid analogues, and sometimes even compare favorably with their background. After all, it is much easier to make amendments to open source code, therefore all found vulnerabilities are fixed faster. And also all new and bold ideas appear here first.

To begin with, we should conditionally divide systems according to their focus. There are CMS designed exclusively for creating blogs, as well as more flexible systems that allow you to create full-fledged websites and media portals. At the same time, blogging systems can be designed to create a whole series of projects, for example, for an entire enterprise. It is also worth noting the development period of the platform (the longer it is, the better the system is developed and contains fewer errors), the presence of a community (it will help if difficulties arise in installing, debugging or using the system), performance (not all systems are suitable for high-load projects). so, Now let's look at each CMS in more detail.

Official site .

This is one of the fairly old and well-proven engines. It's great for ecommerce and sales of goods via the Internet. Many plugins, such as VirtueMart, allow you to open a store very quickly and in a short time. True, to understand everything from scratch, you will have to spend a little time reading manuals, reading documentation and forums. Fortunately, Joomla has very good support and a huge community in several languages, including Russian.

The advantages of the system include the presence of the following functions “out of the box”:

• user authentication, including through OpenID;
• visual article editor;
• convenient file management;
• comment system and protection against spam in them;
• manager of plugins and extensions.

In fact, there are many more advantages; it is very difficult to simply list them all in one article. That is why it occupies a leading position in CMS ratings and tops. But there are some drawbacks: thanks to its flexibility and many settings, a beginner will have to spend more than one day understanding all this diversity. Also, its functionality may be redundant for many simple business card sites. But it is suitable for online stores and product displays.

TYPO3

Official site .

Not long ago, a fairly old CMS, TYPO3, began to gain popularity on the Internet, and now it is firmly entrenched in the TOP 5. The site structure here is represented by a tree of pages. On each of them there can be located standard elements content: text, pictures, tables, etc. This content management system is based on templates that you can either download ready-made or write yourself in TypoScript.

Pros of TYPO3:

• opportunity fine tuning user rights;
• ease of maintaining several sites at the same time;
• ability to use extensions from TER (TYPO3 extension repository);
• high safety requirements;
• advanced text editor with spell check, preview, change history.

Disadvantages of this system:

• the difficulty of editing the site structure using a template engine;
• slow rendering of large pages with varied content (tables, pictures);
• few ready-made solutions for online stores

Recommended for use within large industrial companies and banks. It will most likely not be suitable for young and small sites, or the costs of development and support will be disproportionate to the benefits of use.

Drupal

Official site .

It is also a very popular and widespread CMS, which is used to create websites by very large enterprises, for example, Sony Music. They choose Drupal because of its wide range of functions for building both internal and external websites for the corporate network. There is a huge database of tools for managing a single user base. Well suited for organizing a system of blogs and forums. Drupal has a very active developer community, a huge knowledge base, and a live forum. You can find answers to questions about installation and deployment of sites and modules quite simply.

Advantages of Drupal:

• excellent support from the user and developer community;
• more than 6000 modules that facilitate the expansion of functionality;
• Easily manage user rights, create collective blogs and forums.

Disadvantages of the system:

• may be overly complex for simple sites;
• total lack of beautiful and functional themes;
• difficult to learn for an untrained user.

For business card websites, choosing this CMS is categorically not recommended, but for organizing medium and large portals where users will add their material and comment on it, Drupal is suitable like no other.

MODX

Official site .

One of the youngest CMS (development has been going on since 2004), which appeared at the very beginning of the formation of the so-called Web 2.0. The idea was to involve users in editing and adding content to the site. For example, writing reviews, reviews and even entire articles. Therefore it is present here good system user registration, site search using AJAX (without reloading the page), you can quickly expand the news feed, and a collective blog. The disadvantages include common problems with Russian encoding, which have not been fully resolved, although they appeared a long time ago; absence ready-made modules and solutions for organizing a gallery, forum, and electronic store.

WordPress

Official site .

If anyone still doubts that WordPress has long outgrown the “blogging system” stage, then these doubts should be cast aside. A great variety of websites are developed on this CMS, including social networks, company websites, online stores and product displays, forums, as well as simple business card sites.

With thousands of ready-made themes, plugins and even ready-made assemblies for different needs, WordPress takes a well-deserved place in the TOP 5. There is an active developer community that generates lessons and information materials.

Advantages of WordPress:

• large developer community and well-structured documentation;
• thousands free plugins and design themes for the site;
• convenient admin panel.

Disadvantages of WordPress

• the starting functionality immediately after installation is quite modest, you need to supplement it with at least 4-5 plugins;
• After a simple installation, some security improvements are needed.

In fact, this is one of the simplest and most beginner-friendly systems. It allows you to create websites without understanding anything about programming (read mine). Highly recommended as your first CMS. In the future, if its functionality turns out to be limited for you, then you can easily transfer the site to another engine of your choice.
[In most cases, the top ones are occupied by these 5 CMS, which I reviewed in this article.

When answering the question “which CMS to choose for a website,” you should pay attention to the fact that popular engines are constantly under attack. Their code is open for use by everyone, including not entirely honest people who can look for vulnerabilities in it and use them for their own selfish purposes. The danger can be avoided if you promptly update the engine to the latest version. At the same time, if you use a less common content management system, then if difficulties arise, you may have nowhere to find help and can only rely on yourself. Take this factor into account as well. Good luck!

Hello, dear readers of the blog site. Today I want to talk about such a thing as a website engine or, scientifically speaking, a CMS (content management system).

Essentially, these are programs for a web server that greatly simplify the creation and maintenance of a website. Well, the website itself will allow you (if you create it yourself and don’t spend money on its promotion).

If you want to add your resource to this rating, then do not use the corresponding button on the right above the table.

By the way, if you think that it will be a little difficult for you, you can look web studio rating, located on the same resource. There you can see the projects created by this studio by clicking on the link in the “Works” column.

This is roughly what the statistics look like on the engines used by RuNet users (here not only Joomla, but all popular CMSs in general) in the context of which version of the CMS is used - new or outdated:

On Joomla, in addition to regular websites, quite a lot are created, thanks to the existing store extension called .

Probably the easiest free engine to learn is WordPress. Of course, it is mainly used for a rather narrow niche (creating and introducing blogs), but if desired, it can be used to implement websites, forums, and galleries. But first of all, WordPress is a very functional blogging CMS.

the site runs under the control of WordPress (but this is a secret, because the engine used and its version must be hidden, judging by the Yandex advice voiced above). I wrote and continue to write about the subtleties and nuances of working with this engine in the section, and about extensions for it in the section.

Judging by the speed graph above CMS work, WordPress is the underdog in this race, but I personally didn’t feel that way. In general, WordPress can be made to run fast without creating an outrageous . True, this will take a little time, but your blog can become very fast and very easy. I wrote about the increase in the column of the same name.

Now my blog is hosted on and with a load of 20-25 thousand visitors per day, I am still pleased with the speed of WordPress, especially after finalizing the template and optimizing everything that can be optimized. Although, when using a large number of plugins, without and without additional optimization, WordPress becomes a rather heavy monster.

It is clear that there are still many free CMS, which are used for certain purposes. It's still the same Drupal or DLE ( DataLife Engine), and for many cases their use will be justified, because an ideal CMS does not exist, but WordPress and Joomla mentioned just above are the most popular. The reason may be their fairly simple design and clarity for novice users.

Which paid engines are the most interesting?

Another example that can be given as a not very expensive and fairly fast paid CMS is S.Builder. To understand how to create websites on this engine, most likely, it will not take you very much time, because... it has a fairly low barrier to entry (as they say, it is intuitive). This system is written for the end user - absolutely unprepared and with no experience in webmastering (it can work in Word and that’s fine).

S.Builder is quite flexible and you can do almost everything with it, but, say, unlike Drupal (which can also do almost everything), with S.Builder you can do all this without getting into the code at all (there is a powerful module designer according to your needs).

Well, as I already mentioned, this CMS is one of the fastest engines and holds the load quite well, although it is also written in PHP. This is most likely due to the good cleanliness of the code (it was written from scratch) and good caching performance.

You can try S.Builder for free both online and offline. In the first case, you will need to go to the “Demo version on-line” page and they will create a temporary site on this CMS, where all the modules will be available for “trying out the pen”. If online testing you are not satisfied, then you can download from the “Download CMS” page a fully functional and absolutely free offline version of this engine (as if you were) - “Trial version of CMS for installation on a local computer.”

Finally, I want to give you the opinion of a professional optimizer from a very famous SEO company"Ashmanov and Partners", which gave a rather detailed answer to the question - Which CMS is better?:

P.S. Sometimes you want to know what engine does this or that site run on?. It turns out that this can be done quite simply and elegantly. In the article I just mentioned such a plugin - Wappalyzer. A very interesting thing.

When it comes to choosing a content management system for project development, the choice on offer is vast. Depending on how advanced a CMS you need, what its built-in language should be, and who will be using it, choosing the perfect CMS for your project can be a nightmare.

However, some CMS are slightly superior to others in terms of ease of use. Some are easier to install and use extensions - thanks to the leading developers for thoughtful planning. Here are 10 of most popular CMS online that you can use in your next project.

1. WordPress

What can be said about WordPress that hasn't already been said? The blogging platform in PHP, whatever one may say, is the most popular CMS for keeping diaries, and perhaps the most popular CMS in general. A great platform for beginners, well documented and with a very fast installer. Just five minutes and the CMS is already working – it’s great! Not to mention, the newest versions automatically update the core and plugins from within the backend, without the need to download separate files.

For users not familiar with HTML and other markup languages, there is a built-in WYSIWYG editor. The backend of the system is streamlined and intuitively controlled. Beginners can easily cope with administration. In addition, WordPress has built-in support for uploading images and multimedia to the site.

JavaScript. Fast start

A simple and transparent theme language has been implemented for developers, as well as an API for developing plugins.

The WordPress community is a dedicated and hard-working bunch. WordPress has perhaps the most extensive database of plugins and themes to choose from. An important feature of the WordPress community is the availability of a huge amount of advice and instructions online on almost every aspect using WordPress. Everything you could ever dream of has most likely already been done for WordPress, and it’s written about somewhere.

2. Drupal

Drupal is another CMS that has a very large, active user community. While not focusing on a blogging platform, Drupal is just that: a content management system. Easy installation equipped with a ton of additional modules, with which you can add many interesting features, such as forums, user blogs, OpenID authentication, profiles, etc. Creating a website with social networking functions is done using a simple Drupal installations. In fact, with the help of additional third-party modules, you can create several interesting clones of popular sites (such as YouTube or Amazon) with minimal effort.

One of the most popular features of Drupal is the taxonomy module, which allows you to organize multiple levels and types of categories for various types content.

The Drupal user community provides excellent support for each plugin and any general questions.

3. Joomla!

Joomla! – a very advanced CMS in terms of functionality. Nothing to say, get started with Joomla! very easy thanks to the installer. Joomla! Installer can work remotely with most systems used as web servers, and is quite simple considering the amount of software it can be configured.

Joomla! has a lot in common with Drupal - it is a complete CMS that can be more than a simple portfolio site. It comes with an attractive administrative interface complemented by intuitive drop-down menus and other features. This CMS perfectly supports access protocols such as LDAP, OpenID and even Gmail.com.

On the Joomla! With more than 3,200 extensions posted for this popular CMS, it is clear that the developer community is alive and active. Just like in Wordress, you can add almost anything using extensions. required functions. However, the Joomla! relies on paid themes and plugins, so if you want to customize something, be prepared to pay.

4. ExpressionEngine

ExpressionEngine (EE) is an elegant and flexible CMS solution for any type of project. Originally designed to be extensible and easily modified, EE stands out in terms of quality of development and intuitiveness of the administrative interface. It will take literally seconds to understand the structure of the backend and start filling the system with content or start changing its appearance. Even less advanced users will be able to get started creating their website using the backend with fantastic ease, without feeling overwhelmed.

ExpressionEngine comes with the ability to create multiple websites with one software installation. For designers EE offers powerful engine templates with custom global variables, SQL queries and built-in version control. The speed of the site is facilitated by caching of templates, queries and tags.

One of my favorite features of EE is the ability to search and replace text in all objects at once. Anyone who has ever made a website or blog knows how convenient it is to change a large amount of data, without having to go through and open each page in order to change and publish it.

ExpressionEngine differs from the above CMSs in that it is paid. An individual license costs $99.95 and a commercial license costs $249.99.

5.TextPattern

TextPattern is popular among designers because of its simplicity and elegance. TextPattern is not one of those CMSs that includes every feature you can think of. Its code base is slim and minimalized. TextPattern's main goal is to provide you with a great CMS that produces well-structured, standards-compliant pages.

Instead of a WYSIWYG editor, TextPattern uses Textile markup in text areas in order to create HTML elements along with the page. The resulting pages are extremely lightweight and load quickly.

JavaScript. Fast start

Explore JavaScript basics on a practical example of creating a web application

TextPattern is deliberately simple in design, and its backend is surprisingly easy to use and intuitive to navigate. New users will easily understand the administration area.

Although TextPattern's core is minimalistic, third-party extensions, modules, and plugins can be used to increase its functionality. TextPattern has an active developer community that provides help and resources on its website, Textpattern.org.

6. Radiant CMS

All of the above content management systems belong to PHP programs. PHP is the most popular language for developing web applications, but that doesn't mean you can ignore other popular web languages ​​like Ruby. Radiant CMS is a fast, simple and minimalized CMS comparable to TextPattern. Radiant is built on the popular Rails framework, and the Radiant developers have gone to great lengths to make the system as simple and elegant as possible, yet packed with the functionality you need. Like TextPattern, Radiant does not use a WYSIWYG editor, but instead relies on Textile markup to create complex HTML documents. Radiant also has its own templating language, Radius, much like HTML, which is used for intuitive templating.

7. Cushy CMS

Cushy is a completely different type of CMS compared to all the others. Of course, it comes with all the basic features of a standard content management system, but it is not language-specific. In fact, this CMS is a web application hosted on the Internet. No need to worry about loading the system or upgrading it in the future.

Work in Cushy occurs as follows: the system website uploads content to the selected server via FTP, the markup of which the developer or designer, in turn, can change in the same way as post fields in the backend - simply by changing the types of styles. It's very, very simple.

Cushy CMS is free even for professional use. It has a setting that allows you to upgrade to a Pro account and use your own logo and color scheme and other easily customizable features.

8. SilverStripe

SilverStripe is another PHP-based CMS that behaves much like WordPress, except it is much more configurable and is built for content management rather than blogging. SilverStripe is unique in that it is built on its own PHP framework – Saphire. It comes with its own template language to help designers.

SilverStripe has some interesting features built in, such as version control and built-in SEO support. What's truly unique about SilverStripe is that developers and designers can customize the administration interface to suit their clients as needed. Although the SilverStripe developer community is not as large as other projects, there are some additional modules, themes, and widgets available to expand the functionality. In addition, SilverStripe offers very few styles for designers, and you will definitely want to change the themes of your sites.

9.Alfesco

Alfesco is a powerful enterprise content management solution that is JSP based and surprisingly easy to install. An incredibly useful feature of Alfesco is the ability to drag and drop files into folders on the server, converting them into web documents. Alfesco requires a little more work than many other CMSs, and is not that friendly to beginners, but thanks to the enormous power of the system, it is quite useful. The administrative backend is simple and beautiful.

Although Alfesco is not so a good choice for most regular websites, it is perfect for enterprise needs.

10. TYPOlight

TYPOlight seems to have the perfect balance of features implemented in this CMS. In terms of functionality, TYPOlight can be compared to Drupal and ExpressionEngine, and it even offers unique module packages such as mailing lists and calendars. Developers can save time with the built-in CSS generator, and there are many training resources for this CMS.

The downside of this CMS is that it has too many features and configurable options.

Even if the backend is already carefully organized, there will still be many options to consider. But if you want to create a website with advanced functionality and a small additional programming, TYPOlight will do just fine.

So we looked at the list of the ten most popular CMS (content management systems), I hope you liked it.

Choosing the right engine for a web resource ensures the success of its operation and the effectiveness of achieving the goals set for the site. Today there are hundreds of different engines: popular and not so popular, commercial and so-called open-source.

Usually, as part of articles about engines, we present overall rating from the top 10 website management systems. Here we will expand the information a little; below you will see several ratings of different CMS types.

So, the first top represents commercial systems. They were created specifically for the purpose of making a profit from sales of licenses and add-ons. Nevertheless, such engine options lead in quality and popularity. No wonder they say that you have to pay for everything :)

Open-source are so-called free systems, which manifest themselves in free access to copying a program and distributing it. Attention! They are not necessarily free.

Characteristics

1C-Bitrix

This software is in first place in the ranking of boxed engines and in the overall top. What did she do to deserve such recognition? Many developers choose such an engine if they need to create a large portal, online store, information resource or website of any other type. It is advisable to use this system specifically for major projects, since Bitrix requires the same large investments.

It is often chosen for creating online stores due to its integration with a wide 1C base. The advantage in this case is also that you can set up various promotional programs for buyers, as well as divide them into different rates for several legal entities.

In general, web resources made on this engine are distinguished by the quality of their work, the ability to add many modules, excellent protection against third-party attacks, separation of rights of several administrators, and site integration with Yandex. Market and other services.

Joomla!

• extensive toolkit, which can be expanded even further by installing various extensions(additional modules, plugins);
• high security, including multi-level authorization of administrators, as well as division of rights for moderators;
• the ability to choose from an extensive catalog of templates - you can change appearance site, in addition, there is a special option for creating an individual layout; in general, many people like Joomla precisely because many aspects can be customized;
• Updates are constantly coming out.

Joomla websites have a fairly flexible structure thanks to all the listed advantages. Initially, this engine was created for corporate websites, blogs, business card sites, but in general it works great with e-commerce portals and social platforms.

Drupal

When it comes to the question of which cms is better, you can definitely pay attention to Drupal. This is a powerful engine, aimed primarily at complex web portals and professional administrators. Working with this program requires some training and previous experience.

Let us list the advantages of this system:

• synchronization with partner sites;
• short convenient addresses;
• the ability to change the “themes” of the site, choose from the proposed options;
• translation option into different languages ​​is available;
• the function of creating web portals with similar elements (a single user base, for example);
• mechanical protection of the load on the web portal (for example, when the load is too high).

Drupal is suitable for advanced sites: online stores, large communities. In other cases, it is unlikely that the time, physical and material costs will be justified.

MODX

If you are wondering which cms to choose on a financially affordable basis, then we recommend paying attention to MODX - software professional level, which is suitable for providing a variety of sites.

Distributed under license, it belongs to the second group of our open-source rating, but in terms of popularity it occupies an honorable fourth place in the top ten.
It is logical to assume that such demand is associated precisely with the ability of everyone to use this system for e-commerce and other purposes.

A definite plus is that MODX can run on almost all web servers and interacts effectively with different browsers.

UMI.CMS

UMI.CMS is the final position in the top five engines. Almost all developers note the functionality of this content management system:

• ability to work in several languages;
• a large selection of different templates;
• adaptive design;
• for online stores, you can track various statistical data such as information on the amount of the average check.

At the same time, UMI.CMS is also cost-effective.

WordPress

WordPress is the answer to the question of those who are looking for how to choose a cms that is simple, understandable, but at the same time functional. Really, technical knowledge are not at all necessary when working with this engine; the developers tried to make the interface as simple as possible. Moreover, such simplicity is an advantage even for professionals.

By creating a web portal based on this engine, the webmaster does not have to worry about how it will be filled without his participation, because the administrator has a large number of instructions and ease of management at his disposal.

WITH using WordPress It’s easy to create blogs, news resources, and any portals where you need to quickly add content. The best part is that the functionality can be increased by installing various plugins at an affordable price.

NetCat

NetCat is one of the options for those who are looking for which cms is better to use to create a website for electronic media, a store, create a corporate resource and other complex projects.

NetCat allows you to develop portals in mobile version, and also supports responsive design. For quality system management, it is necessary to have good functionality for search engine promotion, integration with payment programs, 1C database and other useful services. NetCat meets these requirements.

Many people consider NetCat to be an intuitive engine. It is useful that the interface can be divided into two: for the user and the developer, and for use there is no need to use complex technological solutions.

HostCMS

What can you say about HostCMS? If it is in our top, it definitely deserves attention. And here are the reasons.

• No special requirements to hosting and servers.
• Effective SEO optimization of sites based on this engine (you can specify meta tags, create simple page addresses, etc.)
• Works great with high traffic sites.
• Ability to exchange data with the 1C system.
• The cost of the small business version is about 6,000 rubles, but the user receives a fairly functional engine with the ability to expand the toolbar.

CS-Cart

Many people choose CS-Cart to work with online stores, since website developers based on this system are provided with an extensive toolkit:

• convenient organization of Internet marketing;
• good form of working with orders;
• the ability to easily add content;
• good SEO optimization of resources based on this engine;
• Creation adaptive design website;
• integration with various services such as 1C or Yandex. Market.

Amiro.CMS

In total, the set of this content management system consists of about 60 modules, which are enough to launch a high-quality web resource on almost any subject.

So, we’ve finished our review of dozens of leading content management programs; now it’s time to turn to the capabilities of the online generator engine.

System from LPgenerator

Of course, when we talk about how to choose cms for a website, we cannot forget about the advantages and capabilities of online one-page generators. This perfect solution both for beginners and professionals.

Based on LPgenerator, you can create landing pages of various types. This could be a business card website, for example.

Or a mini online store.

Or a portal through which a simple presentation of a service/product takes place.

At the disposal of users convenient editor, as well as hundreds of templates in , which can be remade for a niche business, then easily assign your own domain, synchronize it with necessary services and optimize.

Choose what you think the best option for yourself, but don’t neglect really profitable offers.