Define what's better: Samsung or Xiaomi not so simple. After all, each of the presented brands has its own advantages and disadvantages, and on the world market these two manufacturers share the leading position in terms of sales. However, if we compare two specific models from Samsung and Xiaomi, then finding the best of two evils is quite possible, which is what we will do in the article below.

A little about the history of the companies

Samsung is a world famous manufacturer of electronic and household appliances, which has been operating since 1938. During its entire existence, the company has overcome not a single competition, and now, when people are faced with the question: what to choose Samsung or Xiaomi, she is again ready to show herself in all her glory.

But Xiaomi is a completely new, but already very promising company, which creates competition for Samsung Corporation not only in the sale of phones, but also any other electronic technology. However, it was its smartphones that brought the greatest popularity to the Chinese manufacturer.

After all, in terms of their technical and optional filling, they practically do not differ from branded models of a competing company. But if you compare Xiaomi and Samsung: which is better in terms of price, the choice will clearly not be in favor of the second manufacturer. After all, the cost of Chinese gadgets is noticeably lower than the Korean original, which has become a key criterion for their success.

Samsung Galaxy J5 or Xiaomi Redmi 4X

We previously mentioned that to determine: which phone is better, Samsung or Xiaomi, you can only compare specific models from both manufacturers. And as a good example, let's take two budget class prototypes: Samsung Galaxy J5, and Xiaomi Redmi 4X.

At the same time, for the most fair assessment, we will determine which is better: Xiaomi Redmi 4X or Samsung j5 according to several criteria at once. Namely:

Appearance and ergonomics

• As popular wisdom says: there are no comrades according to taste. However, according to an objective assessment, in terms of ergonomics, a clear advantage can be seen in the Redmi 4X, since it is significantly inferior to its competitor in both weight and dimensions;

Screen

• If we compare Xiaomi 4X and Samsung Galaxy J5 in terms of size and display quality, then we will see two absolutely similar HD screens, 294 ppi in size, not differing in anything at all. Therefore, this criterion can not even be taken into account;

Power and memory

• In terms of performance, the Chinese Xiaomi gadget takes an advantage over competitor to Samsung, since it is equipped with 8 nuclear processor, with a RAM capacity of 3 GB. But the Galaxy J5 hardware, represented by a 4-core processor, with 2 GB of RAM, will read the same information 2 times slower, which already puts it in a losing position (if you make a choice between Samsung GalaxyJ7 and Xiaomi Redmi 4X, then this difference in performance will not be observed. However, the J7 model will cost significantly more than the J5 model);

Built-in memory

• Built-in memory. Just like the display, the internal memory on the Galaxy J5 and Redmi 4X models is completely similar: 16 GB, with SD card support (up to 64 GB). But if we compare by this parameter Xiaomi Redmi 4X and SamsungJ3 (the closest predecessor of the J5 model), then the difference will already be significant. After all, the J3’s built-in memory does not exceed 8 GB, and the allowable memory capacity for its SD card is only 32 GB;

Cameras

• Front and main cameras. In terms of resolution, the cameras of Redmi 4X and Galaxy J5 are also considered similar. However, due to optimized software settings, the second prototype will produce images of better quality. Moreover, this phenomenon is typical for Samsung models. And if you compare completely different models (for example Let's take Samsung A5 and Xiaomi Mi 6), with cameras of the same resolution, the effect will be obvious;

Autonomy

• Chinese manufacturer Xiaomi has repeatedly demonstrated its superiority in creating autonomous gadgets that can operate long time without recharging. And the 4X model is further confirmation of this. After all, the volume of its battery is almost twice the volume of the battery of a competing smartphone (4100 mAh, versus 2600 mAh). And this is a significant indicator. In addition, a similar picture will be observed when comparing Xiaomi Redmi 4X, and Samsung A3 having more best performance, if the model J

It is worth noting that the comparison Xiaomi Redmi 4X and SamsungJ3 2017 year is worthy of special attention. Since in addition to the built-in memory, this model from J5, not too different.

But in terms of price it is closer to Xiaomi. However, if you still have a choice: what to take, Samsung GalaxyJ3 or Xiaomi Redmi 4X, then it’s better to stay with the Chinese prototype. After all, as the comparison above showed, it significantly surpasses its competitor in almost all criteria.

Bottom line

Using the example of similar models Galaxy J5 and Redmi 4X, we learned which phone to buy: Xiaomi or Samsung. Of course, many may object to the advantages of the Chinese manufacturer, since before this, Chinese equipment was associated with far from the best quality. But these stereotypes are a thing of the past.

After all, after detailed study all criteria of the presented models, select, which is better: Galaxy or Xiaomi Redmi, it wasn't difficult. The battery of the Chinese gadget can hold a charge twice as long, and its cost is significantly lower than products from a popular, branded manufacturer.

Well, the only advantage of the Galaxy J5 model can be considered only best quality shooting. Therefore, choosing which is better to buy: Samsung or Xiaomi, the choice will be obvious.

It is no secret that, along with the depreciation of the domestic currency, many have paid close attention to Chinese smartphones. At the same time, many solutions are purchased abroad, delivered by mail and cost almost 50% of the local price. They also actively buy Chinese smartphones in communication stores, since most are easily convinced that the characteristics of the Chinese new product are comparable or even head and shoulders above the analogue from Samsung, and are cheaper. So why overpay, because everything is done in China and they have learned how to do it? We will provide an answer to this question by considering budget smartphone Samsung Galaxy J1 Ace Neo.

The J series smartphone models from Samsung have been known to domestic buyers for quite a long time. Updated budget samsung smartphone Galaxy J1 Ace Neo was presented this summer. We will note only its key technical features, you can check out its specifications. So, the new product is controlled by a quad-core processor with a frequency of 1.5 GHz. This is not an advantage, since modern Chinese smartphones have equally powerful chips. The key is the display and its cover glass. The new smartphone uses Super AMOLED screen, which is known from the company’s top smartphones of the Galaxy S series and tablets of the Tab S series. These screens were developed by Samsung and they are significantly superior to the known IPS matrices. For those who don’t believe, just compare the screens of the two solutions.

Cover glass of smartphone screens from Samsung much more durable, which is easily confirmed by a banal search on the Internet. In general articles entitled “smartphone sensor does not work”, “phone screen does not work” - owners of Chinese devices complain in the comments; as a rule, one fall leads to cracks on the screen, and the second to a complete failure of the device.

All this is understandable and forgivable, but the opinion of the population that the Chinese have learned to do things cheaply and efficiently is not excusable. In fact, high-quality solutions from Chinese manufacturers turn out to be even more expensive than those from European ones, since without owning technologies, but only by borrowing them, there is no way to reduce the cost of production. Therefore, all reductions in price are always achieved at the expense of quality, and the question is whether this “new quality” will suit you at the offered price or not.

Comments:

Budget smartphones cheaper than ten thousand rubles with NFC module there are very few on the market. One of these new...

Available colors- black, blue and red. Key Features steel dual 12+2-megapixel main camera...

Huawei Mate X is equipped with an 8" screen with a resolution of 2480x2200 pixels, folding into 6.6" and 6.38" panels (19,...

New items include a 3G chipset MediaTek MT6580, 1 GB of RAM and 16 GB of internal memory, dual camera With...

Based on MediaTek Helio P60, supporting NFC, equipped with a 21-megapixel main camera and offering 6,...

In short: ASUS is airy and radiant, but its build quality let it down, just like the “gypsy” chrome-plated Wileyfox. Redmi 4A design = no design, Meizu design - old iPhone. Samsung looks like a flagship from the front and consumer goods from the back, Nokia - vice versa.

Screen

Lord ASUS, you heard my prayers! Thank you! I feel like the person who said “I don’t want food prices to rise!”, and after that they magically stopped becoming more expensive. Jokes aside, but starting with ZenFone 3, in all new ASUS smartphones The matrices are excellent, some of the best for the money. And ZenFone Live is no exception - the display is very bright, with a normal oleophobic coating and good viewing angles. If you look at it from the maximum angle, you will notice a slight transition to blue shades, but by the standards of the “up to 10 thousand rubles” category, the image is simply excellent. Another thing would be to remove the non-switchable electronic crap, which darkens the display in selected cases, so that the contrast seems higher than it is - and overall beauty!

For example, how Xiaomi Redmi 4A allows you to remove electronic impurities. Do you want “honest”, close to ideal color rendition? Disable automatic adjustment contrast in settings. If you want the automation to “chatter” colors and brightness/contrast within a wide range (so the display seems brighter, albeit at the cost of “curves” from the point of view of color photographers) - please, you can turn this passion on permanent basis, or leave it at the discretion of the system. With “higher” settings, the Redmi display “cheats” up to 460 cd/m2 brightness and 930:1 contrast. The gamma, of course, goes on a walk and is stretched to 2.5 (the screen is noticeably brightened), but the automation manages to not spoil the colors too much. If I were the owner of Redmi 4A, I would enable increased contrast on a permanent basis.

Whenever I test flagship Galaxy smartphones, I like to mention, they say, Samsung is one of the world's largest display manufacturers, and that the company's engineers simply ate the dog on the quality of manufacturing and configuration. In the case of J3 2017, the dog is in your South Korea they ate instead of in order to choose a good display and install it in your smartphone. The only good thing about the J3's screen is the clarity, it's on par with its rivals. In all other respects, the display looks terrible - “acidic” colors, so-so brightness level, color temperature skewed to blue (the same “white” color produced by a car’s xenon headlights at night). I understand the essence of the theory “We are Samsung, which means they will buy a smartphone anyway,” but if you have your own “court atelier” with cheap good displays it’s time to write books about such stinginess (however,

The modern market offers great amount technologies in a wide range of technical capabilities and prices. Among the most popular brands, companies and Samsung invariably appear, not only in the domestic but also in the world market. And very often people planning to buy a phone wonder what to choose: Xiaomi or Samsung? Of course, each manufacturer has advantages, and each specific model needs to be compared. But there are also general trends and characteristic advantages of each company, which we will discuss in this article.

general information

Samsung was founded in 1938 and is engaged in the production of various household appliances, including TVs, laptops, computers, tablets and smartphones. And in each of the niches occupied in the market, this company has a leading position. Even if you are not particularly interested in news from the world of technology, you have probably heard about Samsung more than once. Well, if you delve a little more into what is happening on the market mobile technology, then you know that flagship smartphones and Samsung tablets compete even with the Apple concern itself.

Compared to Samsung, Xiaomi is absolute beginner. At the same time, the progress of this Chinese manufacturer is so fast that today in any hardware store, among the product options proposed by the manager, there will definitely be something from Xiaomi. The Chinese produce not only smartphones, but also a huge amount of other equipment.

However, the manufacturer gained worldwide fame precisely for its smartphones. The emphasis was placed on the release of gadgets in the budget segment, and this bet paid off in full. Xiaomi dropped the price, while offering customers quality that is not too much worse than the market leaders. And if a few years ago, Chinese products were automatically associated with low quality or counterfeits of more expensive goods, now we have managed to get rid of this stereotype through the efforts of the Xiaomi company.

Give gifts

Comparison of Samsung Galaxy J5 and Xiaomi Redmi 3 models

As mentioned above, each phone must be analyzed separately, identifying it competitive advantages and disadvantages. Due to the fact that these manufacturers have extensive the lineup, comparing all their gadgets in one article is not possible. But we suggest that you take as a basis for comparison one model from each company that best characterizes the entire brand.

To be fair, let's take examples from budget lines both companies. Still, in terms of flagship mobile devices So far, Xiaomi is noticeably behind the market leaders, but in budgetary sphere feels confident. Today we offer to compare Samsung Galaxy J5 and Xiaomi Redmi 3.

1. Design and ergonomics. Of course, only you can decide which smartphone is better in terms of design; it all depends on your taste. Subjectively, it seems that in terms of ergonomics the Chinese smartphone wins. The device is noticeably smaller in weight and dimensions, making it more convenient to use.

1. Display. In both cases, the screen has HD resolution with a pixel density of 294 ppi. So make a choice based on this parameter, inappropriate.
2. Performance. The Xiaomi smartphone has an eight-core processor, while the Samsung has a quad-core processor. In terms of productivity, the “Chinese” is almost 3 times faster than its competitor! Xiaomi also has a better graphics accelerator. Random access memory Xiaomi has 3 GB, and Samsung has 2 GB. Therefore, if you are planning to make a choice whether to buy Samsung or Xiaomi, based on the maximum performance of the gadget, then you should definitely choose a representative of the Chinese company.
3. Inner memory. Volume internal memory in both cases 16 GB. Work with memory cards is supported. Most likely, the standard ROM capacity will not be enough and you will have to buy an SD card. But even with its minimum volume it will be easy to provide the basic needs of the user.

1. Cameras. The camera resolution in both cases is the same, but the quality of the photos is better with “ Korean». Samsung phones have significantly more optimized software setup what helps them create high quality photos in a variety of shooting scenarios. With Xiaomi, incredible blurriness appears for no apparent reason, or the color rendition does not fit into any goal. And this situation, unfortunately, is observed in most budget gadgets from the Chinese manufacturer.
2. Autonomy. The undisputed favorite in terms of autonomy is Xiaomi. Its battery capacity is 4100 mAh, while the competitor's battery capacity is 2600 mAh. Xiaomi also has higher energy consumption due to increased performance, but this difference is not particularly noticeable. Therefore, it will last longer without charging “ Chinese"- up to three days with moderate use.

Bottom line

As you can see, despite the fact that the Xiaomi company appeared on the market much later than the Samsung company, Chinese manufacturer today can offer a high-quality and inexpensive smartphone, which in terms of characteristics is even ahead of its competitor in price segment. Both devices have good opportunities in terms of performance, but in terms of additional indicators Xiaomi wins. So if you choose a mobile device for yourself in budget segment and decide which is better – Samsung or Xiaomi, then we recommend giving preference to the product of the Chinese company.

According to a study by IDC, at the end of 2017, the first and second places in smartphone sales were occupied by Samsung and Apple. The remaining “prize” places were occupied by Chinese brands: Huawei, OPPO, Vivo, Xiaomi and others. Why have Chinese smartphones become so popular and why do we hear the words Xiaomi and Meizu more often than Apple?

In this article on Galagram, we will give you the 5 main reasons why Chinese smartphones are better than global brands. The point here is not at all about the topic of our site, but about the objective reasons why the “Chinese” occupy leading positions in sales in the ratings. The article is the personal opinion of the author, which is based on some official figures and facts. And so, let's go!

1 Affordable prices

The first and most important thing is, of course, the affordable price. Chinese smartphones. Well-built and functional budget phones start at $100-120. These are such popular phones as Xiaomi Redmi 4/4 Pro, Meizu M3S/M5S and others. With such affordable price, A-brands literally have no chance with similar devices at a price 1.5-2 times higher.

When it comes to flagships, they are of course compared to latest phones Apple iPhone and top Samsung smartphones. With similar filling, power and functions, Chinese flagships They cost much less, 2-3 times cheaper than flagships from famous well-known brands. A striking example of this is the $250 Xiaomi Mi5, which in terms of build quality, performance and photo capabilities is not inferior to flagships from A-brands for $500-700.

2 Variety of models

Another argument in favor of Chinese brands is the huge number various models phones. Just look at the assortment of Xiaomi and Meizu - many devices with different body materials, diagonals, with different characteristics and capabilities, for almost any price segment.

Even the most demanding user will be able to find a smartphone to suit every taste and color. Super-cheap $80 smartphones with native Android on board, with two cameras, protected - the Chinese produce everything.

3 Android operating system updates

How often do Samsung, Sony and HTC update their flagships to next version Android with new features and functions? Rarely, really. How often do they update their mid-range and budget models? Probably never. Chinese brands have a completely different policy regarding updates and support for their sold phones.

Of course, this does not apply to all manufacturers from the Middle Kingdom, but to many of them. OnePlus regularly releases updates for Oxygen/Hydrogen OS. And companies such as Huawei, Xiaomi and Meizu do not release Android updates, but they often release updates and fixes for their own firmware EMUI, MIUI and Flyme. Global brands should learn this from the Chinese

4 Productive filling

If previously everything Chinese, including phones, was considered to be of poor quality, today the situation has changed dramatically. Chinese brands They try to equip their creations with the most advanced mobile chips, cameras and other technological equipment.

You may have noticed that the flagships from Xiaomi are the first to come out on top Qualcomm processors, and on the most advanced MediaTek chipsets - latest flagships from Meizu. The Chinese try not to compromise when it comes to iron and other important components modern smartphone. Because I know what the user wants - maximum performance for reasonable money.

5 Ecosystem

Most Popular Chinese companies, in addition to their smartphones, they are also trying to develop their own ecosystem of gadgets, accessories and services for them. For example, Xiaomi has its own division for creating smart technology for the MIJIA home, LeEco has its own library of online content, and so on. Of the world-famous brands, only Apple and Google can boast of high-quality additional services to your devices.