Which processor is better 625 or 652. MediaTek Helio X20 or Snapdragon? Chipset comparison


Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 is one of the most popular mobile processors of 2017. The best representatives of mid-price smartphones, such as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4x, Xiaomi Mi A1, Motorola Moto G5 Plus, Lenovo P2, Asus ZenFone 3, Samsung Galaxy S7, Xiaomi Mi Max 2, work on it. India's best-selling smartphone, Redmi Note 4, also packs the Snapdragon 625. If you want to own one of these quality smartphones, you might be interested to know how much performance this processor delivers.

First, we'll take a look at the specs and compare the improvements this chip has made over its predecessor, the Snapdragon 617. After that, let's look at the benchmark results and compare the Snapdragon 625 with other processors. Next, we'll discuss performance, CPU performance in games, value for money, and energy efficiency. Results will be shown in the popular AnTuTu and Geekbench benchmarks based on smartphones running this processor. Comparisons will be made with Snapdragon 617, 630, 650, 652, 430, 435, 450, 820 and 821 models. Comparisons will also be made with MediaTek MT6750, MT6755, Helio X10, Helio P10, Helio P15, Helio X20 processors. The Samsung Exynos 7580, 7870 and Huawei Kirin 655 and 650 processors will not be forgotten either.

Specifications

  • Name: Snapdragon 625
  • Manufacturer: Qualcomm
  • Type: mobile system on a chip
  • Series: Snapdragon 600
  • Release date: 2nd quarter 2016
  • Process: 14nm FinFET
  • Processor architecture: 64 bit
  • Number of cores: 8
  • Configuration: 8 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at up to 2 GHz
  • GPU: Adreno 506
  • GPU frequency: 650 MHz
  • Memory type: single channel LPDDR3
  • Modem: Qualcomm X9 LTE
  • Bluetooth version: 4.1
  • USB: 3.0
  • Charging: Quick Charge 3.0
  • Digital Signal Processor: Hexagon 546
  • Image Processor: Dual-ISP
  • Maximum screen resolution: 1080p
  • Storage: eMMC 5.1
  • Camera resolution: up to 24 MP

CPU, GPU and memory

Qualcomm introduced the Snapdragon 625 on February 11, 2016, along with the Snapdragon 435 and 425 models. The code name of the processor is MSM8953. It became the first in the Snapdragon 600 line on the 14 nm FinFET process technology. The chip replaced the Snapdragon 617; a thinner technological process solved problems with overheating and throttling in previous generations of processors. Although ARM Cortex-A53 cores are still used, the frequency has increased by 500 MHz.

The next-generation Snapdragon 630 processor also runs on ARM Cortex-A53 cores. The Adreno 506 graphics chip ensures stable gaming performance even after extended use. Its clock speed is 650 MHz and it outputs images at 1080p resolution. Snapdragon 625 only supports single-channel LPDDR3 memory, which is quite enough for budget devices.

Modem, screen, camera and other functionality

The Qualcomm X9 LTE ​​modem is capable of providing incoming connection speeds of up to 300 Mbps and outgoing speeds of up to 150 Mbps. Multiple SIM cards and VoLTE are supported simultaneously. Thanks to this, the processor is capable of delivering 1080p resolution, but supports 4K video playback. The Bluetooth 4.1 communication standard and USB 3.0 interface are used. It also uses a Hexagon 546 digital signal processor with support for Qualcomm All-Ways Aware technology. There is support for the communication standard.

The eMMC 5.1 standard is used for permanent file storage; the maximum photo resolution can reach 24 megapixels. Quick Charge 3.0 technology is responsible for fast charging, although it depends only on the device manufacturer whether it will work or not. For example, the Redmi Note 4x smartphone does not support fast charging.

Benchmarks

Benchmarks mainly test the central and graphics processors, as well as RAM. The Snapdragon 625 isn't the fastest for a mid-range processor, but it is among the best optimized. The benchmark results aren't great, but in real-world performance it outperforms its competitors. Typically, 8-core processors with Cortex-A53 score 40-50 thousand points in the AnTuTu benchmark, but in this case, a higher clock speed and technological process allowed it to cross the 60 thousand point mark.

The graph shows the results of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X smartphone, Moto G5 Plus, Lenovo P2, Asus ZenFone 3 and Mi Max 2. All of them scored more than 60 thousand points. Mi Max 2 is in the lead, although the difference of 2-3 thousand points is considered insignificant. Even if the same device is tested twice, the results will be different. In this case, the results are 10-15 thousand points higher compared to devices based on Snapdragon 617 and MediaTek Helio X10, 20 thousand higher compared to Snapdragon 430 and 435. Devices based on Snapdragon 65X series processors (650, 652 and 653) are easily overcome mark of 75 thousand points due to a more powerful graphics processor and ARM Cortex-A72 computing cores.

Geekbench

Here the results of the Snapdragon 625 are also decent. In multi-threaded performance, Xiaomi Mi Max 2 leads with 4201 points, followed by Samsung Galaxy C7 in second place. In single-core performance, the average score is just above 850 points. The Galaxy C7 is in the lead here with a score of 875 points, followed by Xiaomi Mi Max 2 and Redmi Note 4x.

Performance

System-on-a-chip performance is determined primarily by the central processing unit. Cortex-A53 cores are not able to compete with Cortex-A72 and Cortex-A73, but this does not interfere with everyday work with a smartphone; you are unlikely to notice a difference in the speed of loading applications, scrolling through menus, etc. The 14nm FinFET process provides small performance gains and saves energy.

Energy efficiency

Along with energy savings, throttling and heat levels are reduced. This improves battery life and delivers higher frame rates in games and videos. It will be possible to play for a longer time.

Games

The Adreno 506 handles games at 1080p resolution without any problems. Of course, the graphics chip here cannot compare with Adreno 508 (Snapdragon 630), Adreno 510 (Snapdragon 650/652/653), Adreno 512 (Snapdragon 660), but its capabilities are sufficient for such a resolution.

Price/performance ratio

The cost of smartphones on this processor starts from $150 and can reach $400. Devices like the Redmi Note 4X provide better value for money compared to devices like the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro. In each case, you need to carefully look at the device specifications. Models priced under $300 on this processor are the most attractive purchase.

Other options

For a mid-priced chip, there is a sufficient level of memory support, a modem, a signal processor and image processing, and fast charging. In 2018, even more capable devices should appear on Snapdragon 630 and 660 processors.

Grade

  • Performance: 4
  • Energy efficiency: 4.5
  • Games: 4
  • Value for money: 4
  • Other possibilities: 4

final grade: 4,4

Comparison with other processors

Comparison with Snapdragon 617

As mentioned above, Snapdragon 617 is the predecessor of Snapdragon 625. It uses a 28 nm process technology, the performance is lower due to the 1.5 GHz frequency. There are problems with throttling.

Comparison with Snapdragon 630

This processor is the successor to the Snapdragon 625, the process technology and the number of cores have not changed. The clock speed has increased to 2.2 GHz, resulting in slightly higher performance. It uses an improved Adreno 508 GPU, a faster X12 LTE modem, dual-channel LPDDR4 memory and support for Quick Charge 4.0 fast charging. This is a new processor and there are few devices on it yet.

Comparison with Snapdragon 650

It uses more powerful Cortex-A72 processing cores and a powerful Adreno 510 graphics chip, but uses the old 28 nm process technology. The processor becomes warm after prolonged use.

Snapdragon 652 comparison

This processor is similar to the Snapdragon 652, but has two additional Cortex-A72 cores. There are even more problems with throttling here, as a result of which some smartphones, like the Coolpad Cool 1, can heat up to 50 degrees after prolonged games. Therefore, Snapdragon 625 has the advantage of a thinner process technology.

Comparison with Snapdragon 430

This processor belongs to the budget Snapdragon 400 line. It uses eight Cortex-A53 cores with a frequency of 1.4 GHz. The modem and GPU are also weaker.

Comparison with Snapdragon 435

Reminiscent of the Snapdragon 430 processor, but with a better modem and other minor improvements. It is also made on a 28 nm process technology and cannot compete with 14 nm models.

Comparison with Snapdragon 450

Not long ago, Qualcomm introduced the Snapdragon 450 processor, which became the first in the Snapdragon 400 line on the 14 nm process technology. It resembles the Snapdragon 625, but has a lower clock speed, resulting in slightly lower performance.

This processor belongs to the major league, it uses Kryo computing cores and Adreno 530 GPU, an X12 LTE modem, and four-channel LPRRD4 memory. It is included in the flagship smartphones Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, Xiaomi Mi 5 and OnePlus 3, among others. It is also made on a 14 nm process technology.

This chip resembles the Snapdragon 820, GPU performance has increased by 5%. It runs smartphones such as Xiaomi Mi 5s, OnePlus 3T, G6 and others. Naturally, Snapdragon 625 cannot compare with it.

Comparison with MediaTek MT6750

This processor also uses eight Cortex-A53 cores, but at a clock speed of 1.5 GHz. It is made on a 28 nm HPM process, so its energy efficiency is lower. This chip is included in the Vivo V5 and Oppo A59 smartphones.

Comparison with MediaTek Helio P10

This processor is also known as MT6755, it is also 8-core and also based on Cortex-A53. Among the smartphones on it are Lenovo K5 Note, Moto M, Oppo R9, Sony Xperia XA, Gionee M6. The maximum clock frequency is 2 GHz, the technological process is 28 nm HPC+. The developers claim that its energy efficiency is 30% higher compared to the HPC process technology, but it does not reach 14 nm FinFET. The Adreno 506 outperforms the Mali-T860 MP2 graphics chip in the Helio P10, so overall the Snapdragon 625 is better.

Comparison with MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757)

An improved variant of the Helio P10 with a clock speed of 2.3 GHz, a more advanced GPU and lower power consumption thanks to the 16 nm FFC process. Among the smartphones on this processor are Meizu ME2 and Sony Xperia XA1. There is support for dual-channel LPDDR4 memory, the Mali-T880 MP2 graphics chip is slightly weaker compared to the Adreno 506. The central processor is slightly faster, but the power consumption of the Snapdragon 625 is lower. In terms of optimization, the Qualcomm processor is also the leader.

Comparison with MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)

This processor belongs to the flagship series of the Chinese manufacturer with eight Cortex-A53 cores with a frequency of 2.2 GHz. It uses 28 nm HPM process technology, PowerVR G6200 graphics chip and dual-channel LPDDR3 memory. The GPU lags behind the Snapdragon 625 in its capabilities.

Comparison with MediaTek Helio X20

10-core processor with three types of cores: two Cortex-A72 2.2 GHz, four Cortex-A53 1.85 GHz and four Cortex-A53 1.4 GHz. Uses 20 nm HPM process technology and Mali-T880 MP4 graphics, dual-channel LPDDR3 memory. On paper it's better than the Snapdragon 625, but in reality it's not. Like all MediaTek processors, this one cannot boast of a high level of optimization; the presence of ten cores further complicates the situation. In tests of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 smartphone, it lags behind the Redmi Note 4x.

Comparison with Samsung Exynos 7580

8-core Cortex-A53 processor with a frequency of 1.6 GHz. The production uses a 28 nm process technology, Mali-T720 MP2 graphics, and LPDDR3 memory. This processor powers the Samsung Galaxy On8 and Galaxy J7. This processor is clearly weaker compared to the Snapdragon 625.

Comparison with Samsung Exynos 7870

This chip is similar in performance to the Snapdragon 625 and is also made on the 14 nm FinFET process technology on the same eight Cortex-A53 cores, but their frequency is only 1.6 GHz. Mali-T830 graphics and LPDDR3 memory are used. This processor powers the Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime. Due to the higher clock speed, Snapdragon 625 wins slightly.

Comparison with HiSilicon Kirin 650

Huawei octa-core Cortex-A53 processor with a frequency of 2 GHz. Mali-T830 MP2 graphics and LPDDR3 memory are used. The energy efficiency of the 16 nm FinFET process is almost as good as 14 nm FinFET. This processor can be found in Huawei Honor 7 Lite. It is only slightly inferior to the Snapdragon 625.

Comparison with HiSilicon Kirin 655

Used in Huawei Honor 6X and Honor 8 Lite smartphones. Here, the same eight Cortex-A53 cores have a frequency of 2.1 GHz on a 16 nm FinFET process technology. The Mali-T830 MP2 graphics chip is also used and again the Snapdragon 625 is slightly better.

Comparison with Xiaomi Surge S1

The first processor produced by Xiaomi and the Xiaomi Mi 5c smartphone runs on it. It uses a powerful Mali-T860 MP4 graphics chip and dual-channel LPDDR3 memory. The processor is 8-core with two types of cores, the frequency reaches 2.2 GHz. The disadvantage of this system on a chip is the use of 28 nm HPC process technology. Thus, it is more powerful, but consumes more power compared to the Snapdragon 625.

Conclusion

After such a detailed comparison, you can understand why many smartphone manufacturers prefer the Snapdragon 625 in the mid-range segment. The Snapdragon 630 that replaced it is already available, but it will take some time before devices based on it are widely distributed. There should be more by the end of the year.

At the beginning of 2016, Qualcomm updated its line of mid-class chipsets, introducing several interesting models. The middle solution (located between the Snapdragon 430 and 650/652) was the Snapdragon 625, a solid representative of the middle class. In the second half of 2016, interesting smartphones have already been released using this chip, both from recognized giants and companies from China. As of early 2017, the chip is a reference representative of the middle class and remains relevant.

Technically, the Snapdragon 625 chip is a balanced solution created using the latest technological standards. It is created using the 14 nanometer process technology, thus being the first chipset in the series created according to these lithography standards.

CPU

The Snapdragon 625 chipset contains 8 processor cores based on Cortex A53 microarchitecture. They represent an intermediate solution that can provide acceptable performance without loading the battery or overheating. All cores are grouped into a single cluster. Their frequency is adjusted dynamically, depending on the load, and can reach 2 GHz.

GPU and screen

Graphics processing in the Snapdragon 625 is handled by the integrated Adreno 506 graphics processor, which belongs to the newest (at the time of writing) generation of Qualcomm integrated graphics. It contains 96 computing units operating at 650 MHz. The peak performance of Adreno 506 is about 130 GFLOPS. The graphics in Snapdragon 625 support API Vulcan 1.0, OpenGL 3.1, and DirectX 11.2.

The display controller in Snapdragon 625 supports FullHD resolution. The maximum resolution can be 1920x1200 pixels. In this mode, the image refresh rate is 60 Hz (FPS).

Memory controller

The memory controller in the chipset is designed to work with LPDDR3 memory at a frequency of 933 MHz. There is only one communication channel with RAM (which is typical in the middle class), its throughput reaches 7.5 GB/s. To work with permanent memory, eMMC 5.1 and SD 3.0 controllers are provided.

Connection

The modem integrated into the chipset supports LTE Cat 13 in transmission mode (up to 150 Mbit/s) and Cat 7 in reception mode (300 Mbit/s). Theoretically, it is possible to operate 2 SIM cards on LTE networks; in practice, it all depends on the smartphone. Of the older standards, 3G WCDMA (HSPA), CDMA, TD-SCDMA and GSM are supported. All popular frequency ranges are supported at the hardware level, but in a particular device their list may be limited by modem drivers.

Wi-Fi supports 802.11a, b, g, n, ac standards at 2.4 and 5 GHz frequencies. Theoretically, the peak speed can reach 433 MB/s, but in practice it will be lower, since only one MIMO channel is provided.

Navigation capabilities allow you to use GPS, GLONASS, Beidou and even Galileo satellites for orientation (which is still at the commissioning stage). There is also support for Bluetooth 4.1, NFC, and infrared. Snapdragon 625 is the first mid-range chipset to support USB 3rd generation.

Cameras

The Snapdragon 625 chipset contains dual ISP (image processing processor) which allows for dual cameras. For a single matrix, the resolution is limited to 24 MP. When using two sensors, their resolution should be no more than 12 MP. There is hardware support for recording video in 4K at 30 frames per second.

Other characteristics

Snapdragon 625 is equipped with a DSP (digital signal processor) Hexagon 546. It is responsible for processing data from various devices, such as the screen sensor, and is designed to reduce the load on the processor cores and reduce battery consumption. The chipset also supports active noise reduction technologies. The charge controller built into the chip is compatible with QuickCharge 3.0 fast charging.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 performance

Modern characteristics are good, but without practical results they make little sense. In terms of performance, the Snapdragon 625 is doing quite well. The processor consists of Cortex A53 cores, which, although not very powerful, are not prone to overheating. In single-core mode, the chip does not work much faster than budget analogues, but in multi-core mode, due to the frequency, there is decent potential. The cores are not grouped into the big.LITTLE scheme, and this provides a foundation for the future.

In the GeekBench 4 test, single-core mode gives about 800 points, multi-core - almost 3000. In AnTuTu, the chipset scores 60-65 thousand points. The graphics account for about 12-15 thousand, which is a good indicator. In practice, these results mean that the processor is quite suitable for demanding games. Many of them will run at maximum settings; only the most demanding ones may need to be set to medium quality.

There is also enough performance reserve for web surfing and multimedia functions. Hardware support for decoding H264 and H265 formats provides the ability to play high-definition video, up to 4K resolution.

To summarize, I would like to note that this is one of the best solutions in terms of price/quality on the mobile chipset market. This chip is currently an uncompromising option, and smartphones with it are generally of a good level.

Technology continues to develop at a breakneck pace, but in some areas it is not particularly noticeable. One of these areas is the battery life of mobile devices, where for many years in a row smartphones have been released that can last only one day without recharging. Some smartphones show results a little better, some a little worse, but on average one day of work is the usual value.

Some of the latest smartphones have proven that this situation should not be considered normal. It is interesting to note that all of these smartphones are not flagship smartphones, they are quite affordable. These devices are connected by the fact that they all run on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 processor. This is a budget processor based on a modern 14 nm process technology with high energy efficiency.

This processor has allowed many smartphones to reach a battery life of two days, and some even three. Even with the most active use of the device, it will be able to work for a very, very long time. Let's see which smartphones can boast of such performance.

  1. The Lenovo P2 with a 5.5-inch screen has the largest battery on this list, with a capacity of 5100 mAh. Depending on the intensity of use, such a smartphone can work for three to four days without recharging. If you try to discharge it in two days, you will see that this requires keeping the screen on all the time. Lenovo P2 runs on a no longer modern operating system, although an update to Android Nougat is promised in April.

    Its user interface does not look very good, to put it mildly, but if battery life is your top priority, you can try to upgrade your smartphone with third-party loaders and icon packs. But the performance of the smartphone in everyday work is surprisingly smooth. The camera quality is average, the quality of 4K video recording cannot be compared with the capabilities of flagship smartphones, but given the affordable price, this is expected. Lenovo P2 is the champion of autonomy in its price category and that says it all.

  2. The Moto Z Play is an impressively thin smartphone with battery capacity that can't match the Lenovo P2. Despite this, the 3510 mAh battery allows the smartphone to work for a surprisingly long time. With an average load, the device lasted two days. Moto Z Play supports magnetically plug-in Moto Mods, so you can connect a speaker, projector, and extra battery to it. The smartphone offers a functional and clean interface that is very close to stock Android, and also has a very good camera.

  3. This smartphone is quite attractive considering its price of $230 for the base version. In terms of price-quality ratio, this is one of the best modern smartphones. It doesn't last as long as the Lenovo P2 or , but a day and a half isn't a problem for it, and with more moderate use the smartphone can last two days. The advantages of the Moto G5 Plus include an excellent camera and a nice Android shell, but the main advantage has already been named and it is the low price. For the price of one you can buy three Moto G5 Plus devices.

  4. The mid-price smartphone from the Chinese company Huawei is selling well in different countries. This happens thanks to the high-quality design and economical processor, which allows the smartphone to work for at least two days without recharging. The main attraction of this device is the selfie camera with a lot of effects, although some of them are minor or aimed at teenagers. The smartphone runs very smoothly, which is typical for Huawei devices. In terms of price-quality ratio, this will be an excellent purchase.

  5. MediaTek Helio X20 and Snapdragon 625/650: comparison of Xiaomi, Meizu and Huawei smartphones based on X20 and S625/S650 chips in benchmarks and battery life.

    When comparing MediaTek Helio X20 and Snapdragon 625 chipsets, we will do the following. First, let's compare the technical characteristics of the processors, talk about what parameters of the smartphone they affect, and predict which processor should be faster, cooler and more economical in terms of battery consumption.

    Then we’ll move on to the most interesting practical part and check the correctness of our predictions based on the results of testing real smartphones. The MediaTek Helio X20 and Snapdragon 625 processors are most often of interest to people who are choosing between the two versions of Redmi Note 4. There will definitely be a comparison between these smartphones.

    To make the comparison of processors more representative, we will include smartphones from Meizu and Huawei in the comparison. Thus, we will see how software optimization by different manufacturers affects the performance of the chipset. And finally, to make the material as useful as possible, let’s add another processor to the comparison - Qualcomm Snapdragon 650!

    MediaTek Helio X20 and Snapdragon 625/650: characteristics and theory

    The first important difference is production technology. Snapdragon 625 is manufactured using 14 nm process technology, Helio X20 MT6797 is manufactured using 20 nm technology, and Snapdragon 650 is manufactured using 28 nm technology.

    The 625 Dragon should have minimal heating and battery consumption. Smartphones based on Helio X20 should demonstrate good, if not outstanding, autonomy, and the hottest and most ruthless in relation to the battery should be the 28 nm Snapdragon 650. We will check these predictions soon.

    MediaTek Helio X20 vs. Snapdragon 625 and Snapdragon 650
    MediaTek Helio X20Snapdragon 650Snapdragon 625
    Technical process20 nm28 nm14 nm
    Number of Cores10 6 8
    Processor architecture2x Cortex A72+
    4x Cortex A53+
    4x Cortex A53    		2x Cortex A72+
    4x Cortex A53    		8x Cortex A53
    Clock frequency2x 2.3 GHz +
    4x 1.9 GHz +
    4x 1.4 GHz    		2x 1.8 GHz +
    4x 1.2 GHz    		up to 2.0 GHz
    Graphics acceleratorMali-T880 MP4 780MHzAdreno 510 GPUAdreno 506 GPU
    RAM2x LPDDR3 933 MHz2x LPDDR3 933 MHzLPDDR3 933 MHz
    LTE ModemCat.6
    300/50 Mbit/s     		Cat.7
    300/100 Mbit/s     		Cat.13/Cat.7
    300/150 Mbit/s
    Displayup to 2560 x 1600up to 1900 x 1200up to 2560 x 1600
    Video recording4K @ 30fps4K @ 30fps4K @ 30fps
    Cameraup to 32 MPup to 24 MPup to 21 MP

    The second important difference is Number of Cores. The Helio X20 has the most of them - ten, and the Snapdragon 650 has the least. The number of cores should have an effect when performing heavy processes in multitasking mode. The Helio X20 should be the best in this operating mode, followed by the Snapdragon 625. The last in these tests will most likely be the Snapdragon 650.

    The third fundamental point is kernel architecture. What the Helio X20 and Snapdragon 650 have in common is the presence of powerful Cortex A72 cores (which is why we included the S650 in the comparison). In Snapdragon 625, all eight cores are based on Cortex A53 architecture. These cores are optimized for power consumption, but have less processing power compared to Cortex A72.

    Therefore, when performing tasks in single-core mode, smartphones on processors with Cortex A72 cores, that is, on the Helio X20 and Snapdragon 650 chipsets, should be faster. The S625 should be the last in such tests. A similar balance of power should be observed when comparing the overall performance of chipsets and the operating speed of the smartphone.

    And the fourth point - graphics adapter. The MediaTek Helio X20 uses the quad-core Mali-T880 - a powerful graphics system that is also found in the Galaxy S7. The Adreno 506 in the Snapdragon 625 seems to be the weakest graphics chip, but the Adreno 510 in the S650 can compete with the Mali-T880 on equal terms.

    The remaining characteristics of the Helio X20 and Snapdragon 650 will not have a big impact on the operation of smartphones. Let's note the differences in the RAM controllers - the S650 and X20 support dual-channel memory, while the S625 supports single-channel memory, but this will not change the balance of power. The type of RAM is the same for everyone, LPDDR3, and this is the main thing.

    Categories of modems differ, but all smartphones can receive data at speeds of up to 300 Mbit/s. Only the data transfer speed changes: it is maximum for Snapdragon 625 (150 Mbit/s) and minimum for MediaTek Helio X20 (50 Mbit/s).

    MediaTek Helio X20 and Snapdragon 625/650: testing smartphones

    To confirm or refute the correctness of theoretical predictions, we will take popular smartphones based on these chipsets:

    • Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (Helio X20)
    • Meizu MX6 (Helio X20)
    • Huawei nova plus (Snapdragon 625)
    • Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (Snapdragon 625)
    • Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (Snapdragon 650)

    Why did you choose these particular smartphones? It's simple - they have exactly the same type, diagonal and screen resolution: IPS - 5.5 - Full HD. Thanks to this, the comparison of Helio X20 and Snapdragon 625/650 will be as correct and representative as possible.

    GeekBench 3 evaluates the speed of the CPU (central processing unit) in single-core and multitasking mode. The forecasts were confirmed - in single-core mode, smartphones based on Helio X20 and Snapdragon 650 processors with powerful Cortex A72 cores are ahead. Both processors showed similar results, despite differences in generations of smartphones. The Snapdragon 625 lags far behind. The scores scored by Huawei nova plus and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 on S625 are almost identical.

    Helio X20 vs Snapdragon 625/650 in GeekBench 3 (single-core)

    We see an interesting picture in GeekBench 3 Multi-Core. Here the number of cores matters, and therefore the Snapdragon 625 (8 cores) is ahead of the S650 (6 cores), but noticeably inferior to the Helio X20, which has 10 cores, two of which are powerful Cortex A72.

    Helio X20 vs Snapdragon 625/650 in GeekBench 3 (multi-core)

    Next in line is checking the graphics performance in the GFX and BaseMark X benchmarks. The MediaTek Helio X20 MT6797 processor and Snapdragon 650 are actually on par. In GFX, Meizu MX6 on Helio takes the lead, and in BaseMark X, Redmi Note 3 on Snapdragon 650 already takes first place. We conclude that the Mali-T880 and Adreno 510 graphics chips actually have comparable power. Adreno 506 is noticeably inferior to them.

    Helio X20 vs Snapdragon 625 and Snapdragon 650 in GFX 3.1 Manhattan (onscreen)
    Helio X20 vs Snapdragon 625 and Snapdragon 650 in BaseMark X

    It remains to check the performance of smartphones in comprehensive tests AnTuTu and BaseMark OS 2.0. The results in these benchmarks are affected not only by the speed of the CPU and graphics accelerator, but also by RAM, internal interfaces and software.

    The best in comprehensive tests were smartphones based on Mediatek Helio X20. The Redmi Note 3 on the Snapdragon 650 gave them about 10,000 points in Antutu. The synchronous lag of smartphones on the Snapdragon 625 was more than 10,000 points from the second place and about 30,000 thousand from the first.

    Helio X20 vs Snapdragon 625 and Snapdragon 650 in AnTuTu 6
    Helio X20 vs Snapdragon 625/650 in BaseMark OS 2.0

    MediaTek Helio X20 and Snapdragon 625/650: checking battery consumption

    Now let’s check how economically the MediaTek Helio X20 MT6797 and Snapdragon 625/650 chipsets consume battery. The easiest way to do this is using the example of different Xiaomi Redmi Note models. They have identical screens from a technical point of view and almost identical batteries. When comparing the autonomy of these smartphones, we are actually comparing chipsets.

    Helio X20 vs Snapdragon 625 and Snapdragon 650: battery consumption
    Redmi Note 4 (SD625)Redmi Note 4 (X20)Redmi Note 3 (SD650)
    Battery4100 mAh4100 mAh4050 mAh
    Autonomy rating119 hours83 hours93 hours
    3G calls34:40 21:17 21:41
    Internet17:56 13:39 12:55
    Video15:30 09:47 12:56

    The data in the table shows that in terms of autonomy, the Snapdragon 625 has no equal in this confrontation. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 on S625 has a much longer battery life, and with the screen constantly on, it can last about 17 hours. Excellent result.

    The performance of MediaTek Helio X20 and Snapdragon 650 differs slightly from each other - in some places it’s better than Redmi Note 3, in others it’s better than Redmi Note 4 on X20. The forecast regarding the cost-effectiveness of the chipset was partly justified - the S625, made using a 14 nm process technology, was indeed the best, but between the S650 and X20 it is difficult to identify a winner.

    It remains to be seen whether it is possible to directly extrapolate battery consumption data to smartphones from different manufacturers. To do this, compare the autonomy ratings of Huawei nova plus and Meizu MX6.

    Helio X20 and Snapdragon 625: battery consumption
    Meizu MX6 (X20)Huawei nova plus (S625)
    Battery3060 mAh3340 mAh
    Autonomy rating68 hours79 hours
    3G calls17:19 24:12
    Internet09:27 11:31
    Video09:07 10:33

    The findings are a bit confusing. The battery life of the Huawei nova plus is higher on the S625, but the difference is minimal and can be attributed to differences in battery capacity. But! Huawei nova plus was tested in maximum chipset performance mode, and Meizu was tested at screen brightness of 200 nits (less than 50%). Therefore, under equal conditions, Huawei nova plus will last much longer on a single charge than MX6.

    MediaTek Helio X20 and Snapdragon 625/650: results

    We have already drawn conclusions in the process of comparing Helio X20 and Snapdragon 625/650, it remains to summarize them and name the winners by category:

    Single core mode: Helio X20 and Snapdragon 650. Snapdragon 625 is much weaker.

    Multitasking: Helio X20.

    Games and videos: Helio X20 and Snapdragon 650. Adreno 506 in Snapdragon 625 is inferior to them.

    Overall smartphone speed. Helio X20 is noticeably faster than Snapdragon 650. Snapdragon 625 loses to X20 by more than 20,000 points, regardless of the smartphone.

    Battery consumption. Snapdragon 625 gives you maximum battery life. Helio X20 and Snapdragon 650 consume battery faster.

    Overheating and throttling under load. Snapdragon 625 practically does not heat up and does not drop frequencies. For Helio X20 and Snapdragon 650, throttling and overheating are common.

    We hope the comparison of processors was informative and useful. Stay with us, we are always glad to see you on the pages of Five-Inches. Please share the link to the article on social media. networks, and if you find inaccuracies or errors in the material, write in the comments. Thank you in advance.

    Qualcomm can safely be called the market leader in microprocessors for smartphones. Most leading brands use its products in their devices, and in terms of performance, even mid-range Snapdragons often surpass top-end chipsets from MediaTek.

    The company classifies the Snapdragon processor lineup into 3 groups: 400 series – entry-level solutions for budget smartphones, 600 series – mid-level processors, 800 series – top-end chips for flagship devices.

    In this article, we will figure out what is better than Snapdragon 625 vs 650, whether the difference between these processors is felt at all during everyday use of a smartphone, and which chipset is better for mobile gaming fans to choose.

    Snapdragon 650 vs Snapdragon 625

    The 650 Dragon has been on the market for quite a long time, it was introduced in February 2015 under the number 618, but was subsequently renamed and took the top position in the middle class. Snapdragon 625 is a chipset announced in mid-2016; the solution is new, but has already been well tested and has earned many positive reviews.

    What's better? Let's start the comparison with basic technical characteristics. Snapdragon 650 – made using a 28 nm process technology and built on 6 cores, of which 2 high-performance Cortex A72 (1.8 GHz) and 4 energy-efficient Cortex A53 (1.4 GHz). The chipset is equipped with an Adreno 510 graphics accelerator, capable of delivering performance of about 180 gigaflops. The data exchange speed of the built-in LTE modem (X8) can reach up to 300 Mb/s, there is support for NFC, Bluetooth 4.1 and USB 2.0 interfaces, and fast charging is also possible.


    Snapdragon 625 is an 8-core chip made using a more modern 14mm process technology, which provides better energy efficiency and less heat. It consists of 8 Cortex A53 cores, overclocked to a clock speed of 2.0 GHz. The chip is equipped with a weaker Adreno 506 graphics accelerator (performance up to 130 gigaflops), but it also benefits in terms of support for wireless interfaces, as it has a fresh LTE X9 modem and USB 3.0, and there is also support for NFC with fast charging.

    The most objective way to compare 2 different processors is to compare them based on the results of synthetic tests. We have the following indicators:

    As you can see, the 625 Dragon surpasses the 650 only in overall performance in GeekBench (the test does not take into account the graphics part), where 8 Cortex A-53 cores make themselves felt. However, in all tests related to 3D graphics, due to the more powerful video accelerator, the Snapdragon 650 has the upper hand. And this is precisely what is more important in practice.

    The conclusion is simple - if you like to play resource-intensive 3D games, then it makes sense to choose a smartphone with the 650 Dragon, it will provide better gaming performance. The difference between the chipsets is not that big. It will be possible to launch and play the heaviest games without any problems on the Snapdragon 625, the differences are only in the ability to set the best graphics settings, have smaller FPS drawdowns in difficult scenes, and also not so often encounter various micro-freezes and stutters, which together determines the comfort of gaming.

    During everyday use of the smartphone, the performance of both processors will be sufficient, and without playing games you will not notice the difference between them. Both chipsets have proven themselves well, including due to minimal susceptibility to heating and throttling.

    To sum up the battle between Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650, we give the championship belt to the 650-Dragon as the most powerful processor that can be found in relatively inexpensive smartphones today, but we recognize that the needs of the average user can be equally satisfied by both chipsets.

    The best smartphones with Snapdragon 650

    Xioami is known for its commitment to the Snapdragon 650, which has released many successful smartphones based on this chip, which have gained popularity due to their excellent price/quality ratio.

    Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro

    RN3P is one of the best-selling smartphones in the world in 2016, which will not lose its consumer appeal in the foreseeable future. For 11 thousand rubles you will get a luxurious device with a powerful processor and 32/3 GB of memory, a large and high-quality 5.5'' IPS Full HD screen, 16/5 MP cameras and a capacious battery that lasts for 2-3 days of full use of the smartphone .

    There are not so many disadvantages - mediocre image quality, lack of NFC and not the fastest fingerprint scanner. However, for its price, this is an excellent smartphone that we definitely recommend for purchase.

    Xiaomi Mi Max

    Mi Max is a huge phablet with a 6.44-inch screen that can boast excellent battery life (4850 mAh battery), performance (Snapdragon 650 + 32/3GB + Micro SD) and an affordable price. If the prospect of using a slightly reduced tablet as a phone doesn’t scare you, then you can take it - there aren’t many alternatives to the Mi Max.

    Disadvantages - frankly bad cameras (however, it is possible to use camera2api for shooting in RAW, which slightly corrects the situation) and not the most attractive design. Price – from 12 thousand rubles.

    The best smartphones with Snapdragon 625

    A huge number of smartphones have been released on Snapdragon 625, which once again confirms the opinion that the chipset turned out to be extremely successful. The best in our opinion are.

    Nubia Z11 Mini S

    The Z11 Mini S is one of the best camera phones in the mid-price segment and is simply a beautiful gadget with balanced characteristics. The smartphone has a 5.2’’ Full HD IPS screen, 64/4 GB of expandable memory, a 23 MP main camera and a 13 MP front camera (there is 4K video recording), and a 3000 mAh battery.

    Disadvantages - crude Nubia UI shell and mediocre earpiece. Price – from 17 thousand rubles.

    Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime

    Redmi 4 Prime is average with a powerful processor and a high-quality FHD screen. The smartphone is made in a metal case with a fingerprint scanner, has 32/3 GB of memory + a slot for Micro-SD, and a thick 4010 mAh battery.

    If you order from China, you can get a smartphone for $130, while our prices for the device start at 10 thousand rubles, which puts it on par with the Redmi Note 3 Pro. If the size of the RN3P scares you, then the Redmi 4 would be a great option to buy. In terms of the totality of characteristics, it has few competitors.

    Huawei Nova

    Huawei Nova is a balanced mid-level device with NFC working in Russia. Among the advantages are a high-quality 5’’ FHD display, good 12/8 MP cameras, interesting design and excellent build quality. Disadvantages - price (from 20 thousand), mediocre battery life (3020 mAh battery) and lack of fast charging.

    If the article was useful to you, do not forget to bookmark (Cntr+D) so as not to lose it and subscribe to our channel!


2024 gtavrl.ru.