What microphone do you need for your home computer? Choosing a microphone for recording voice on a computer How to make a normal microphone for a computer
Computer systems and technologies are developing very quickly these days; the average PC user has opportunities that seemed fantastic just 10 years ago. Skype now won’t surprise anyone at all. Team computer games allow you to almost completely immerse yourself in virtual reality and communicate with each other using ordinary human speech. Musicians, composers, and singers are increasingly using the Internet not only to communicate, but also, for example, to collaborate on works and compositions. Therefore, if previously almost everyone was satisfied with even the simplest microphone built into a laptop, now more and more users are inclined to buy a separate, high-quality microphone for their PC.
The article will talk about how to choose the right microphone for a computer, what types they are, what characteristics of the microphone to pay attention to first of all, at the end there is a little about manufacturers and brands, as well as a video on the topic.
Construction type
Lavalier. Attached to clothing with a special clothespin. As you might guess, it has miniature dimensions. The cost is also low. The main drawback is that the sound quality is not very good; it’s ok for communicating on Skype, but nothing more.
Tabletop. They are located on a stand, which in some models is quite massive (for greater stability). In some models, the microphone can be detached from it. Often stands have buttons for control. The downside, or rather the forced inconvenience, is that the sound quality changes significantly when the distance from the microphone changes, for example, when you move your head.
Headset. It consists of headphones connected to a microphone. Something like this isn't cheap, but it pays for itself. The sound quality is the best possible. It takes up almost no space and allows you to maintain freedom of movement to a certain extent.
Characteristics
Sensitivity. Determines how quiet sound the microphone can pick up and transmit. High sensitivity is not always good because in addition to the voice or music itself, extraneous unwanted sounds can be picked up (the noise of cars outside the window, the sounds of footsteps, operating equipment, etc.).
frequency range. Almost all microphones of lesser quality can reproduce human speech without much interference (from 0.1 to 10 kHz). So, those who need a microphone only for communicating on Skype should not think too much about this option. Before purchasing, it is enough to ask the seller to turn on the device and evaluate the result by ear.
Sound pressure. The maximum sound intensity in decibels (dB) that a microphone can transmit without significant distortion.
Focus. Dependence of microphone sensitivity to sounds from different directions relative to it. Most microphones intended for ordinary consumers pick up sound equally from all directions, but there are semi-professional models where the directionality is very clearly expressed.
How to choose the right microphone for your computer. Signal transmission method
Condenser. In them, sound transmission occurs due to changes in the capacitance of capacitors located between two sensitive membranes. The sound quality is excellent, unfortunately, so is the price.
Dynamic. Sensitive membrane in a magnetic field. Extremely simple, practically unbreakable design. But the quality is not as good as in the first option.
What else is important to consider when choosing
It would be nice if the microphone had a function to suppress external noise. In many cases it greatly improves the sound. Although the cost of the device will be higher.
Pay attention to the reliability of the microphone mount; if it is weak, after a couple of months you will have to go to the store again to buy a microphone. For a desktop microphone, the stand should be as weighty as possible, while preferably not taking up much space.
For voice communication, it is better to purchase a Bluetooth headset. It will allow you to communicate even if you move away from the computer.
About the manufacturers
The most famous include BOYA, Defender, Plantronics, Genius, Sven
Among high-quality budget microphones, we mention Defender MIC-112, Plantronics AUDIO 300, Hama 57151, SVEN MK150.
Expensive, truly high-quality, high-quality microphones include Audio-Technica AT2020, Sennheiser PC 8 USB, Apogee MiC, Blue Microphones Snowball, Shure PG27.
Finally, watch the video on how to choose the right microphone for your computer.
Today, voice messages, online communication, recording video and audio on your channel are an everyday thing. In order for your interlocutor to hear your clear, undistorted, loud voice, and for the sound in the video to be pleasing to the ear, you need to acquire high-quality audio input devices to your computer, or rather, microphones.
You're lucky if you already have a microphone built into your laptop. Although it may become outdated. Usually you have to buy it separately. It is inexpensive, but you need to be able to choose it. Our rating of the best microphones for laptops and computers 2019 will help you with this!
Computer microphones come in different types of mounting:
- tabletop, with stand;
- on clothes - with a clip. Usually the clip fits both the monitor and the laptop lid;
- capacitor. Wireless, connect directly to the corresponding laptop connector. Not suitable for desktop computers;
- wireless headset.
What requirements should be met for microphones so as not to make a mistake with the purchase?
- suppression of external noise. The microphone should highlight the voice, and not reproduce the noise of cars on the street, the blow of wind in the window, or the hissing of oil in mom’s kitchen. Pay attention to the frequency range: the average person speaks within 100-10000 Hz;
- strength of the structure and cord. A microphone is a mobile design, it has to be moved often, and its durability depends on its reliability;
- high sensitivity so that you don’t have to talk very close to the microphone every time;
- compactness. Especially if you have limited desk space or need to take it with you;
- direction of signal catching. Some models can pick up frontal sound and will not respond to sound from the side;
- sound pressure. A microphone can receive a signal, but process and transmit it in terrible quality. This parameter determines how well the signal will be transmitted.
The best microphones for computer and laptop 2019
The Best Tabletop Microphones
A very good desktop option with a bendable leg, well suited for Skype. The stand has a built-in weight for good stability. It may be suitable for online communication, voice chats, and audio messages. Not suitable for recording high-quality audio and video.
Type: desktop.
Noise reduction: yes.
Average price: 120 rubles.
Advantages:
- low cost;
- stable support;
- bendable leg;
- slight noise filtering.
Flaws:
- not all noise is filtered out.
Microphone review - in the video:
This microphone can be used for dubbing non-professional videos. It filters out unnecessary noise and gives a completely clear sound. Very high sensitivity - no need to constantly lean towards it. Of course, this is a great option for online conversations. The design is lightweight and stable at the same time. The stand rotates freely in different directions.
Type: desktop.
Noise reduction: yes.
Average price: 350 rub.
Advantages:
- convenient design: stability, rotation;
- strength;
- easy connection;
- recorded sound is good;
- the cord is long.
Flaws:
- The sound must be quite loud to record. This model is poorly sensitive to sounds that are too quiet.
The microphone, first of all, attracts with its unusual minimalist design. It has a wide range of applications: video dubbing, audio recording, online presentations, conversations. A convenient ball joint between the leg and the stand ensures the structure's mobility in all directions. This is an excellent choice for those who constantly work with sound on their computer.
Type: desktop.
Noise reduction: yes.
Average price: 490 rubles.
Advantages:
- good sensitivity;
- Stylish and compact design, convenient to take with you;
- noise suppression;
- there is a microphone mute button;
- gets along well with other microphones if they are connected to the same system.
Flaws:
- There's a bit of noise when recording. Exit: turn off the speakers.
Microphone comparison video review:
Compact model with a fairly long cord (2m). It connects easily, is stable, the leg bends, and the microphone itself is omnidirectional. Can be used for communication, computer games. There is speech recognition and noise filtering. Not suitable for recording audio and video.
Type: desktop.
Noise reduction: yes.
Average price: 320 rubles.
Advantages:
- good price;
- flexibility;
- compactness;
- pretty good sound transmission.
Flaws:
- the model is not professional;
- low sensitivity - if you speak at a distance, you may not be heard;
- In order for sound transmission and sound reception to proceed normally, you also need to play with the microphone settings on the computer.
The best clip-on microphones
A very inexpensive model that can be attached both to clothing and to a computer, laptop lid, shelf, or table. It can be used exclusively for conversations on Skype or other chats, but the model is not suitable for serious audio or video recording - it does not filter out noise. The sensitivity is quite high - there is no need to hold it directly to the mouth.
Type: for clothes.
Average price: 150 rubles.
Advantages:
- very affordable price;
- easy connection;
- mobility, very small dimensions;
- good sensitivity.
Flaws:
- not suitable for serious audio-video recordings;
- no noise reduction;
- harsh mount.
Microphone test drive in video:
A simple model that is secured to clothing with a clip, or can be attached to the monitor with Velcro. Quite good sensitivity, omnidirectionality. The cord length is 1.8 meters - enough to move freely and not be chained to the screen. Suitable for gamers (voice chats), online communication, and peer-to-peer conferences.
Type: for clothes.
Noise reduction: none.
Average price: 160 rubles.
Advantages:
- affordable price;
- compactness and simplicity;
- good sensitivity.
Flaws:
- does not suppress noise;
- the wire does not allow you to go far from the computer;
- not suitable for professional recording or serious conferences.
Another miniature microphone that is attached to clothing with a clip, and to a monitor or table with Velcro. Suitable for communication and for gamer chats. Not suitable for recording serious videos or audio. Wire 1.8 m.
Type: for clothes.
Noise reduction: none.
Average price: 160 rubles.
Advantages:
- easy to connect and attach;
- sufficient sensitivity not to be attached in close proximity to the mouth;
- compactness and mobility.
Flaws:
- non-professional model;
- no noise reduction, not the best sound quality.
Comparative video review of the gadget:
The model, although suspended, is professional. The diaphragm is omnidirectional, sound recording and playback is excellent. The length of the wire is almost 2 meters. A foam windproof attachment and a convenient and reliable metal clip make this microphone quite suitable for recording good quality sound.
Type: for clothes.
Noise reduction: yes.
Average price: 1960 rubles.
Advantages:
- professional model;
- convenient fastening;
- excellent sensitivity;
- compactness.
Flaws:
- the price is high;
- the wire somewhat ties the speaker to the technology.
The best wireless headsets
Wireless headphones with head-mounted microphone. USB connection, noise reduction in the microphone, can be folded, there is a built-in volume control. Range of action – 10 meters. Work without recharging – 6 hours. The sound is received and output quite well.
Type: wireless headset.
Noise reduction: yes.
Average price: 4700 rubles.
Advantages:
- no wires;
- fairly good sound transmission;
- compactness.
Flaws:
- not enough keys to control;
- the volume is low;
- poor signal through obstacles.
About the pros and cons of the headset - in the video:
The model was developed as a gaming model for maximum convenience for the player: nothing hinders movement, no need to constantly bend over to the microphone, a decent distance from USB. The microphone is equipped with noise reduction, “surround sound” effect. Also suitable for online communication. Conveniently and comfortably attached to the head. There is a volume control. Can also work with smartphones and tablets.
Type: wireless headset.
Noise reduction: yes.
Average price: 11,800 rubles.
Advantages:
- no wires;
- convenient fastening;
- noise suppression;
- "sound around".
Flaws:
- Some gamers note that it is not always audible which side the sound is coming from. For example, the footsteps of approaching enemies. In games, it is very important to hear exactly where sounds are coming from. This is not always clear with these headphones.
Comfortable and convenient gaming headset. You can also buy it to listen to music. Noise suppression in the microphone, comfortable ear cups, complete comfort of use.
Type: wireless headset.
Noise reduction: yes.
Average price: 7850 rubles.
Advantages:
- no wires;
- good sensitivity;
- produces excellent sound;
- comfortable to wear.
Flaws:
- Not all users find the cup size comfortable due to different ear sizes. Be sure to try it on first;
- Users note that they cannot speak into the microphone and hear good sounds from games at the same time. When you try to say something into the microphone, the quality of the incoming sound drops for this period.
Review of the headset - in the video:
Best Condenser Microphones
An excellent and compact model for recording studios. Suitable for regular communication as well. Just plug it into your laptop and use it. Has voice recognition function.
Type: capacitor.
Noise reduction: yes.
Average price: 650 rubles.
Advantages:
- good sensitivity;
- direction;
- excellent quality sound;
- compact and easy to connect;
- recognizes voice.
Flaws:
- quite high price;
- not suitable for desktop computers if the power supply is not located next to the monitor.
Another topical device that is installed on laptops. The leg bends. The microphone is inserted directly into the jack. The sensitivity is high, you don’t have to constantly move closer to the microphone to speak. The output sound quality is not the best, so it is not suitable for professional purposes - only for communication.
Type: capacitor.
Noise reduction: no.
Average price: 350 rubles.
Advantages:
- compactness;
- strength, although it seems fragile;
- acceptable price;
- convenient connection.
Flaws:
- The sound quality is not up to par;
- not suitable for desktop computers whose power supply is not located in close proximity to the monitor.
A true professional model for studio recordings. Connects to the USB connector. Complete suppression of third-party noise - the model highlights only the voice. There is a built-in preamplifier, so the recorded sound is guaranteed to be loud. An attenuator switch is also built-in. There is a headphone output.
Type: capacitor.
Noise reduction: present.
Average price: 17,500 rubles.
Advantages:
- professional model. Excellent sound quality without noise. Many built-in devices for excellent sound transmission;
- Ease of use;
- good stability.
Flaws:
- very high price;
- If a stand is needed, it must be purchased separately.
Professional review of the microphone - in the video:
Creative design coupled with excellent recording characteristics make this model a real bestseller among professional studio microphones. It simply plugs into a USB connector. It is possible to change the direction of the diagram. Amplifier, headphone jack, filters out any noise except voice, excellent sensitivity. The stand is already included.
Type: capacitor.
Noise reduction: available.
Average price: 12,000 rubles.
Advantages:
- professional. Excellent sound and reception quality. Ability to change settings;
- You can choose the color of the case.
Flaws:
- high price.
A full review of the microphone is in the video:
Choosing a microphone begins with finding out the purpose of its use. The principle “better means more expensive” is not needed here. There is absolutely no need to buy a studio-based, ultra-sensitive model with a bunch of bells and whistles if you just sometimes talk to your parents on Skype. And - on the contrary - you should not try to skimp on quality if you are buying a microphone for recording good videos, for a radio station studio, or for recording music tracks.
Nowadays, a microphone has turned from a device that is needed by a narrow circle of people into a popular device. It is used in online games, for dubbing video clips, and communicating with friends, clients and colleagues on Skype.
Many people need a microphone, but from the variety of models presented, it can be difficult for the average user to make a choice.
In order to understand the question of how to choose a microphone for a computer, it is worth understanding the main technical characteristics of this device and the tasks that the microphone you purchased should cope with. This is what we will do now.
Design
First you need to pay attention to the design of the microphone, it comes in several types:
Lavalier microphone. Thanks to a small clothespin, it is attached to clothes. This keeps the microphone at the same distance from your mouth at all times, so head movements do not affect the sound level. Such devices are very convenient due to their small size, but you shouldn’t expect good quality sound from them.
Desktop devices. Such devices have a special stand on which the microphone itself is located. There may also be additional control buttons on the stand. The disadvantage of this design is that when you move your head, the distance to the device will change and the sound level will change accordingly. Therefore, you have to keep your head still.
Computer headset. These are headphones connected to a microphone. The microphone is attached to the headphones using a special holder. The main advantage of this design is that the distance from the mouth to the microphone is the same all the time and the voice level does not change.
Audio interface
There are two main ways to connect a microphone to a computer:
1. Analog- the microphone jack is connected to a standard audio input connector. This interface has many advantages. You have the opportunity to include various electronics in the circuit for working with sound, such as a preamplifier. But if you do not want to use additional equipment, then you will have to rely completely on the computer's sound card. If the sound card is built into the motherboard, then this design will not be suitable for professional solutions. With simple communication you will not notice the difference.
2. USB- the microphone is connected to the USB connector. Expensive models may have a built-in preamp and various other electronics. Cheap microphones do not have additional electronics.
A USB microphone does not have the same flexibility as an analog one, but if you choose a fairly expensive model, its functionality will satisfy most ordinary users.
Main technical characteristics
There are several main technical characteristics that have a decisive influence on sound quality. Knowing these characteristics will help you understand the variety of assortments:
Sound pressure - This parameter determines the maximum sound level in decibels that can be transmitted by the microphone without severe distortion.
Directionality - determines the sensitivity of the microphone to sounds that come from different directions. Mostly non-directional devices are found. They pick up sound equally from different directions and are well suited for a home PC. In some cases, it may be necessary to clearly record a specific sound, in which case one-way microphones are used.
Sensitivity level - determines the minimum sound level that the microphone can pick up. Devices with high sensitivity are also susceptible to excess noise. Therefore, it cannot be said unequivocally that good indicators of this characteristic are good.
Operating frequency range- it is clear that the larger the range of supported frequencies a microphone has, the better, of course. Just understand: the frequency of human speech is in the range of 0.1 - 10 kHz, which means that a device that supports these parameters is sufficient for recording speech.
Sound transmission mechanism
There are two types of sound transmission:
Condenser - sound is transmitted due to a change in capacitance in capacitors, which are located between sensitive membranes. For good sound recording, professionals recommend purchasing condenser-type microphones, since these are the devices that are used in professional studios.
Dynamic- when transmitting sound waves, a sensitive membrane is used, located in a magnetic field. This design is simpler, so it is often used in a budget option.
Model overview
Sven MK-630 - has excellent characteristics of the sound range 30-16000 Hz. The set includes a removable and very convenient stand. The disadvantages include the low sensitivity of the microphone.
It's time to remember the school physics course. Let's start with the device:
- Dynamic microphones- these are “reverse speakers”, in which the winding, oscillating in the field of a permanent magnet, generates a signal. Their advantages are durability, no need for additional power, low output impedance (we will return to this below). But there are also noticeable disadvantages: low sensitivity, dimensions. Therefore, it is simply unrealistic to use them in the form of a headset or “clothespin” - and for computers and laptops such formats are just the most convenient for the most frequent uses.
- For condenser microphones there is a need for an external voltage source (phantom power), but with small sizes they can have decent sensitivity, their amplitude-frequency response is smoother. But due to the need for phantom power and high output impedance, they are not able to work with every sound card (for example, the old Sound Blaster Audigy had a special jumper that switched the microphone input to “condenser” mode).
- Electret microphones- This is a type of capacitor. Regardless of the specific implementation, homoelectret or heteroelectret (put aside the laughter in the audience!), they have such a high output impedance that the amplifier for them has to be built into the capsule itself, and their signal wire simultaneously carries power. Electret microphones are cheap, which is why they are most often used in the computer field. If you accidentally inserted headphones into the microphone input, you heard a characteristic click in them - it was the power for the electret microphone that caused the membranes to vibrate. But the quality of these microphones is appropriate: for serious work with sound, purchase a “condenser” or “speaker”.
Now let's turn to radiation pattern. This concept determines in which direction the microphone “hears” best. Naturally, the ideal option is when the microphone picks up only the signal from the sound source, but in practice it will be of little use: as soon as you move or turn your head, the recording volume will drop sharply. For computers, the following are primarily relevant:
- Omnidirectional microphones They have a very wide directional pattern, “catching” both your speech and extraneous noise, but are little sensitive to movement. This option is best for lavalier or head-mounted microphones that “look” anywhere but at your mouth.
- Cardiodic microphones have a radiation pattern similar to the symbolic image of a heart. They require more precise orientation to the sound source, but there will be less noise in the recording. When recording music at home and reading out text accompaniment for videos, it is worth using a cardiode microphone.
Super and hypercardioid microphones narrowly focused, their element is rather studio work or reporting “in the field”. At home, such a microphone is unlikely to be convenient for you.
And now about the main thing in the question pairing any signal sources. Any microphone has a certain output impedance, and any sound card has a certain input impedance. In general, it is enough to know that the second must be significantly larger than the first, otherwise you will not get a good sound: it will become extremely unintelligible, “waddly”. But it is also impossible to endlessly increase the input impedance of a sound card, especially a built-in one: the noise level will become such that recording sound will become impossible. Therefore, there are two options: either choosing a microphone with a low output impedance, or purchasing a microphone preamplifier or dibox that matches a high-impedance microphone with a low-impedance input. In addition, by increasing the amplitude of the signal fed to the sound card, you will get rid of the need to turn up the pre-amplifier on it itself - this is where all sorts of noise will creep in again on cheap cards.
Choosing the right microphone means a third of the success of high-quality vocal recording. An unsuitable or low-quality microphone will ruin the sound of the vocalist and the entire song. Therefore, the choice of a recording device must be approached responsibly.
The question “Which microphone should I choose for recording vocals?” Every musician has asked himself this question at least once. It would seem that it is enough to find a device that is suitable for the price and quality and pick it up in the store, but in reality everything is not so simple. In a home recording studio, when there is no money to buy a whole fleet of microphones, you want to make the only right choice the first time.
Editorial website tells how to choose a microphone for recording vocals. We studied the market and selected the thirty best microphones for vocal recording in the low, mid and high price segments. When compiling the list of devices, external factors that influence the choice of microphone were not taken into account: the structure of the room, the presence of sound insulation, and individual voice characteristics. We selected microphones only based on price and quality ratio.
Microphones for vocal recording: 40+ best models. Content:
How to choose a microphone for recording vocals
Microphone Directivity
Microphone directionality determines how the microphone records its surroundings and is matched to the room in which it is being recorded. Based on directionality, microphones are divided into several types:
- Omnidirectional and hemispherical;
- Unidirectional - cardioid, supercardioid, hypercardioid and semi-cardioid;
- Bidirectional.
Omnidirectional microphones react to all sounds around them, that is, they record sound both in front and behind them. Omnidirectional microphones are great for recording multiple vocalists or percussion, or when the room has unique acoustic characteristics. Hemispherical microphones react to signals from one side of the sphere, but record them as clearly and honestly as possible.
Scheme of operation of omnidirectional and hemispherical microphones.
Unidirectional cardioid microphones record the signal in front of the microphone, ignoring everything that happens on other sides. Such devices are the best choice for home recording studios and imperfect acoustic rooms where it is not possible to equip a full-fledged vocal room. By adding a sound-absorbing screen behind the microphone to such a microphone, you can eliminate unwanted room echoes.
Scheme of operation of cardioid, supercardioid and hypercardioid microphones. Supercardioid microphones have a narrower sound capture zone in front of them, but at the same time collect a little signal behind them. Hypercardioid microphones develop the ideas of supercardioid devices: an even narrower sound capture zone in the front and a wider zone in the back. Semi-cardioid microphones often used at lectures, meetings and other speaking events.
Bidirectional microphones have greater versatility due to the ability to switch the radiation pattern. The price of such devices is significantly higher than that of omnidirectional or unidirectional microphones, but in return the sound engineer receives a device that is ready for recording in different rooms.
Scheme of operation of a bidirectional microphone. PROS AND CONS OF MICROPHONES OF DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS
Microphones with omnidirectional polar pattern:
- Depends on the acoustics of the room;
- Record the natural reverberation and echo of the room;
- They do not have acoustic insulation;
- They have low sensitivity to the sounds of human breathing;
- They have an extended low frequency range, which is suitable for recording low-sounding instruments.
Unidirectional cardioid and supercardioid microphones:
- Isolates unwanted sounds and signals coming from the side and rear of the microphone;
- Less sensitive to the acoustic properties of the room;
- They have the maximum difference in the sound of signals coming from the front and rear.
Unidirectional hypercardioid:
- Almost completely insensitive to sounds coming from the side;
- Have the greatest possible insulation from adverse room effects, extraneous noise and feedback effects;
- Prevents audio signal leakage.
Bidirectional:
- Used when recording speech;
- They are isolated from any unfavorable sounds, which is useful when recording a drum kit.
Microphone sensitivity
People have a nasty habit of constantly moving away from the microphone. The sensitivity of the microphone helps minimize losses in the volume of the sound signal due to the movement of the vocalist. It is this good sensitivity that has made the Shure SM7B microphone an indispensable tool at radio stations.
Microphone frequency range
The range of reproduced frequencies of the microphone allows you to understand what instruments and sound sources can be recorded using the device. Some microphone models record more high frequencies, others - low frequencies, and others have a balanced sound. For this reason, the same instrument will sound different when recorded with different microphones.
Comparison of reproduced frequency ranges for Oktava 319 (top) and Shure SM58 (bottom) microphones. The range of reproduced frequencies of a microphone can be the main argument in favor of purchasing a particular model. Decide which instruments and vocals you will record. Think about which frequencies you can boost or cut with an equalizer, and which can be left alone. This will reduce the number of suitable microphone models.
Power supply
Almost all microphones require +48V phantom power. While budget devices prefer to be powered by a sound card, more expensive microphones often come with their own external power source.
If you have frequent on-site sessions, look towards microphones with phantom power. If you plan to use the microphone only in the studio, then feel free to consider devices with a separate power source.
Microphone noise level
Noise level is one of the biggest drawbacks of budget microphones. In foreign methods, the noise level is designated as “Noise Floor”, and its value reflects the noise level produced by the microphone itself.
A microphone connected to the sound card produces background noise even when not recording. Noise occurs for various reasons: electrical interference, operation of a preamplifier or audio interface, poor quality cables. It is difficult to identify the real cause, and it is almost impossible to find out the real noise level of a microphone without testing with your own equipment.
Microphone dynamic range and headroom
The dynamic range in the diagram shows that the microphone will record all sounds between 15-135 dB without frequency loss. The microphone still has 19 dB (headroom) left, which acts as overload protection. The dynamic range of a microphone is the difference between the minimum and maximum volume levels of sound that can be recorded by a microphone. Within the dynamic range, the microphone will record the full spectrum of frequencies, while outside its boundaries, the microphone will miss individual frequencies.
Headroom is the dynamic headroom of a microphone, at which it records a signal without overload.
Before purchasing a microphone, decide what sound sources you will be recording. If we are not talking about recording too quiet or loud instruments, then choose models with average values.
Microphones for vocal recording: the best models in terms of price and quality ratio
out of 43
TASCAM TM-80
TASCAM TM-80 TASCAM's budget entry into the microphone market was more than successful. The level of the microphone is slightly better than the particularly popular SAMSON C01, but the manufacturer provides a spider, cable and stand as part of the load when purchasing. The microphone sounds quite adequate for its price: there are dips in frequencies, neutrality is poor, but you can still write speech and vocals. If you're on a budget but still want to set up a vocal part of your home studio, then the TM-80 will be an excellent choice as your first device.
out of 43
sE Electronics X1 S
sE Electronics X1 S The best microphone for recording vocals in the category up to 10,000 rubles. The new version of the X1 S features low noise when working with quiet sources and a large amount of gain, as well as a completely neutral and smooth sound. The model copes well with Russian vowels and sibilants, which is rare among budget models. Ideal for beginning musicians as a first serious microphone for a home recording studio.
out of 43
AKG D5
AKG D5 Direct competitor to the legendary Shure SM58 microphone. The AKG D5 is a device for those who need a versatile microphone for vocals. The device copes equally well with both studio work and concerts.
out of 43
Samson METEOR USB
Samson METEOR USB One of the most popular budget microphones on the market, the METEOR is often a beginner's first choice microphone. The sound picture is better suited for announcer work, but the device also copes with vocal recording without any problems. Separately, it is worth noting the presence of a MUTE button, which is useful for those who stream.
out of 43
Samson C01U PRO USB
Samson C01U PRO USB Despite the presence of many negative reviews, it is one of the bestsellers in the budget segment. Affordable price, normal voice transmission for a device of this level. It makes no sense to demand much from such a device, but the C01U is quite suitable as a first microphone.
out of 43
Shure SM58
Shure SM58 One of the most popular microphones for live performances. Among the advantages: low price, built-in pop filter and resistance to any interference. Additionally, it is worth noting the robustness of the design - in terms of survivability, the Shure SM58 can easily compete with the Nokia 3310. The model is not ideal (it lacks high frequencies), but it will be an excellent choice for novice sound engineers and young rock singers working in their own studio.
out of 43
Rode M3
Rode M3 Budget condenser microphone with a small diaphragm. The miniature Rode M3 is suitable for recording vocals, acoustic guitars and electric instruments. The model can be powered by phantom power or 9V batteries, which makes the device mobile and convenient for working in the field.
out of 43
AKG P120
AKG P120 The third version of the AKG Perception 120, short named P120, is somewhat similar in sound to the less expensive Audio-Technica AT2020. The signal sounds light, with a slight touch of compression, the highs are smooth, but not boring. The immediate advantage is that the microphone is suitable for most voices, including women's voices, which need a little less edge and more depth. The AKG P120 is far from the quietest microphone, but the noise produced does not interfere with recording anything. If you want more in the same form, look towards the P220 - it is more expensive, but higher level.
out of 43
Audio-Technica AT2020
Audio-Technica AT2020 A convenient option for beginning musicians and those who want to get maximum quality at an affordable price. Audio-Technica AT2020 pleasantly embellishes the voice and clearly conveys timbre. Working with the device is incredibly simple - just connect the microphone to your computer and select it as an input source to start recording vocals or hosting a podcast.
Audio-Technica has released two AT2020 models: one with a USB connection, the other with a standard XLR connector. The price difference between the two varieties is minimal, so choose the one that best suits your studio.
out of 43
JZ Microphones HH1
JZ Microphones HH1 The lightweight JZ Microphones HH1 sounds brighter than most dynamic microphones. Unlike the Shure SM58, the output signal of this model is more powerful (thanks to +3 dB gain), and the output noise is much less, even when working with quiet sound sources.
out of 43
AKG C1000S
AKG C1000S Perhaps the most versatile microphone ever. Every musician and sound engineer should own the C1000S: the device is suitable for recording any instruments, studio and concert vocals. Add to this the equally clear and high-quality transmission of any signals and the ability to work even on batteries to understand why it is called the “Swiss Army knife” of the world of microphones.
out of 43
Lewitt LCT 240
Lewitt LCT 240 The Austrian company Lewitt is famous for the Lewitt LCT 640 microphone, considered a true classic in the world of microphones. Since not everyone can pay almost €900 for a microphone, the company has released a simplified and very cheaper model of the device. The Lewitt LCT 240 has a powerful tone and a solid tone that is perfect for deep male vocals. There is no trace of manual assembly in the device, but this is where the disadvantages of the microphone end.
out of 43
Sontronics STC-2X/STC-3X
Sontronics STC-2X The Sontronics STC-2X makes vocal recording a pleasure. Clear and detailed sound, dense low-end without frequency drops and a pleasant presence effect, manifested in frequencies in the upper-bass region. If the STC-2X is difficult to obtain, feel free to switch to the STC-3X - an updated version of the second generation.
out of 43
NADY SCM 1000
NADY SCM 1000 The microphone has been in production for more than 20 years and has long been considered the best in terms of price and quality ratio. Sounds on par with sE Electronics S1 X, Audio-Technica AT2020 and AKG P120. While the sound is warm and quite pleasant, the device has exactly two drawbacks:
- For 20 years, NADY have not learned how to sell their goods: everything comes in a simple cardboard box and looks as if you are buying a terrible Chinese product, and not a high-quality device;
- You can find many cheaper, name-brand and, most importantly, high-quality microphones on sale.
out of 43
Oktava MK-319
Oktava MK-319 The condenser Oktava MK-319 features a wide diaphragm and warm and clear sound. The device performs equally well when recording any sound sources, although its sound may seem somewhat flat. The creators claim that they tried to ensure accurate signal transmission so that everything recorded sounded exactly the same as in reality. Whether this is true or not is an open question.
out of 43
Behringer B-2 PRO
Behringer B-2 PRO The second version of the popular budget microphone, released in 2003 and surviving to this day without any changes. When creating the microphone, Behringer took the Neumann U87 as a basis, trying to make a budget version of it. This partially worked out: the sound of the microphone is surprisingly versatile, smooth and rich for its level, suitable for recording vocals, speech and musical instruments. A double capsule is installed inside the microphone, and the device itself can operate with different polar patterns, depending on the position of the regulator on the body. The B-2 is definitely worth the money.
out of 43
Blue Microphones Spark Digital
Blue Microphones Spark The Spark Digital microphone is designed for those who are used to recording in the field. The device is based on the classic Blue Microphones Spark model, in which the XLR port is replaced by USB. The model is characterized by pleasant sound and ease of use: you can record even from tablets and smartphones on Android and iOS.
out of 43
SE Electronics SE 2200
SE Electronics SE 2200 The sE Electronics SE 2200 condenser microphone is an updated version of the popular sE 2200a II microphone. sE Electronics engineers did an excellent job, as the SE 2200 is the best microphone for recording vocals in the range of 15,000-17,000 rubles.
Unlike the very first version of the SE 2200a, the company decided to abandon several polar patterns, limiting musicians to cardioid. Despite this, the sound of the microphone is balanced and smooth, without embellishments or distortion - the voice sounds juicy, powerful and, at the same time, natural. In general, you definitely won’t regret buying the SE 2200.
out of 43
AKG C3000
AKG C3000 Today, the AKG C3000 is the only representative of the C line, which is more professional in comparison with PERCEPTION (the C2000 and C4000 models were discontinued due to unpopularity). The C3000 is versatile: the model can easily record voice, speech, musical instruments and any other sound sources.
The microphone sounds smooth across the entire spectrum, the signal is neutral. Separately, it is worth noting the presence of two capsules, a −10 dB attenuator and the ability to operate from phantom power not only 48V, but also 15V, which is available on many mixers.
out of 43
MXL V69 ME
MXL V69 ME Despite the excessive brightness when transmitting voices, the MXL V69 ME has a rich tube sound and the ability to add additional beauty to any voice.
out of 43
Rode NT1-A
Rode NT1-A Despite rare inaccuracies in timbre transmission and a slight frequency spike around 120 Hz, the Rode NT1-A sounds quite pleasant. Some users note excessive neutrality in sound transmission, but much of this depends on preference. Thanks to its high-quality build, good performance and affordable price, the Rode NT1 is rightfully considered the best condenser microphone for recording vocals in the budget segment.
By the way, Rode also produces the NT1-A in three variations: NT1-A, NT1-A Recording Pack and NT-USB. The first is the model itself without additional accessories, the second is a set consisting of a microphone, spider, pop filter and cable. As for NT-USB, the model is a special version of NT1-A, powered by a USB port and aimed at those who conduct podcasts and streams.
out of 43
Rode NT1
Rode NT1 The Rode NT1 is similar in features to the NT1-A, although the company notes that the only similarity between the models is the protective mesh. The NT1 conveys voice clearly, adding warmth in the low end. There are also no problems with the transmission of medium and high frequencies. If you're looking for a microphone for recording vocals, you're not strapped for money, but you don't want to overpay - take the Rode NT1, you won't regret it.
out of 43
Rode NT3
Rode NT3 Competitor to AKG C1000 from Rode Microphones. It sounds clean and quite natural, so you can use it to record anything: guitars, keyboards, vocals. Additionally, it is worth noting its ease of use - the NT3 can even be powered by batteries, which can be useful at concerts, where the microphone is just as good as in the studio.
out of 43
JZ Microphones J1
JZ Microphones J1 JZ Microphones J1 is a real legacy of radio electronics of the USSR and the Riga Radio Engineering plant. The J1's sound is on par with the Rode NT2, if not superior to it. The device offers natural signal transmission for both voice and musical instruments, as well as a combination of detail and softness of sound. The J1 is perfect for those musicians who want to buy one universal, but the highest quality microphone for recording any material.
Unfortunately, JZ Microphones products have not found the proper response among domestic musicians: some simply do not trust an “unfamiliar brand”, others do not like their rectangular shape. But in vain.
out of 43
Audio-Technica AT2050
Audio-Technica AT2050 A high-quality universal microphone of an average price, sounding equally good when working with any polar pattern. The AT2050 is an improved version of the AT2020 with tighter low end, excellent balance across the spectrum and very little noise. In addition, the model is equipped with three polar patterns, which increases its versatility. The device copes with high sound pressure without any problems and is perfect for a semi-professional home studio.
out of 43
Avant Electronics Avantone CR-14
Avantone CR-14 An inexpensive, retro-style ribbon microphone that's versatile. Avantone CR-14 is suitable for recording vocals and any musical instruments - guitars, keyboards, strings, percussion. The sound is warm and a little dark, so be prepared for a little post-processing on the vocals in the treble area.
out of 43
AKG C 214
AKG C 214 The younger brother of the premium model AKG C 414. It sounds great, has the highest detail and gives the voice pleasant rich colors. Without a doubt, the best microphone for vocal recording in the sub-$500 price range.
out of 43
Rode NT1000
Rode NT1000 The most affordable microphone for recording vocals from the professional Rode line, and according to some sound engineers, even the best. There's no polarity switching or filters like the more expensive NT2000, but the lack of bells and whistles is made up for by its sound. Accurate, smooth and pleasant voice transmission, absence of distortion and frequency surges, deliberate embellishment and many other shortcomings. The NT1000 sounds a lot more expensive than its price, but if you need an attenuator and a directivity switch, look no further than the NT2000.
out of 43
JZ Microphones Vintage 11
JZ Microphones Vintage 11 JZ Microphones Vintage 11 features deep sound, stylish appearance and high voice accuracy. When creating the device, JZ Microphones engineers were inspired by the design of microphones from the 1920s to 1950s, as well as the sound of the classic Neumann U47, Neumann U67 and AKG C12.
out of 43
Rode NT2 (NT2-A)
Rode NT2-A A proven omnidirectional microphone with a neutral sound and smooth tonal balance across the entire spectrum. Regardless of the selected operating mode, the microphone features good high-frequency detail and a dense and fairly deep low end. Some people think that the device is characterized by problems with sibilants of the Russian language, but whether this is true or not is an open question, much depends on the vocalist himself.
You can find quite a few omnidirectional microphones on sale, whose sound will be no worse than the NT2-A, but not everyone can compete with its low noise level. By the way, the model is still produced exclusively in Australia, which often becomes the decisive point when choosing this device.
out of 43
SE Electronics SE 4400A
SE Electronics SE 4400A Thanks to its omnidirectional design, the sE Electronics SE 4400A is suitable for any studio application, be it recording vocals, speech or musical instruments. The recorded voice sounds clear, and musical instruments sound loud and bright. Add a little compression and equalization to the signal, and the result is unparalleled sound.