The flagship with the best autonomy. Who has more? Top most autonomous smartphones
A Question of Choice good battery smartphones are becoming more and more difficult every year
Today, for some reason, few people pay attention to the fact that their smartphone has powerful battery. And that’s why we’ll now talk to you about the best smartphones with powerful batteries.
Of course, smartphones come in very different sizes. Some people like small ones, some like big ones. Therefore, we will start with the smallest ones and move gradually to the largest ones.
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact
Despite the fact that this smartphone was released back in 2015, it still remains one of the most relevant small smartphones with a fairly good battery capacity, which is exactly 2700 mAh. In fact, such a smartphone is enough for one full working day.
In addition to the battery, there is also a very good 4.6-inch HD screen, still current processor Snapdragon 810 good cameras, fingerprint sensor and, very important for Japanese brand, water and dust protection according to IP68 standard.
Xiaomi Redmi Pro 4
Next we move on to a little large smartphones. Among the 5-inch models with a large battery capacity, there is only one model, and this is Xiaomi Redmi Pro 4. It has a 4100 mAh battery, which should last about 1.5 or 2 working days. Despite the fact that this smartphone is not positioned as a flagship, its power is sufficient for any everyday tasks.
Xiaomi Mi5S and Mi6
If you still need a smartphone with more powerful hardware and a small size, then we recommend the other two models of the same brand, only they are already 100% flagships. Metal Xiaomi Mi5S or glass Xiaomi Mi6. Of course, in both versions weaker batteries than the previous one, namely 3200 and 3350 mAh, respectively. And yet, you will be guaranteed one or one and a half working days with these smartphones.
Meizu, Xiaomi and LeEco
The first one is Meizu. The best smartphones from this brand with 5.5’ inch screens will be M3 Note and Note M5. What’s interesting is that both models come with a 4100 mAh battery, the charge of which lasts for 1 - 1.5 days, and with a Helio P10 processor, in both versions, which shows itself very adequately in everyday tasks.
The next brand is Xiaomi again.
Here it is worth paying attention to three models with 4050 - 4100 mAh batteries. First, this is an ideal solution for budget gaming.
It seems there has never been a game that this smartphone couldn’t handle. One battery charge lasts approximately 1 - 1.5 working days.
AND latest model, This Redmi Pro- in fact, it is something between the two previous models. It's not bad in terms of battery life and good when playing games, but it's main feature- this is the appearance.
If you need something significantly premium and more powerful, then we recommend that you pay attention to the Mi Note 2. It has a slightly larger 5.7-inch FullHD screen, a 4070 mAg battery and, very importantly, the flagship processor from Qualcomm 2016 - Snapdragon 821.
From important factors, this is a very expensive thing with a very beautiful design. And what is important for our topic is solid autonomy of up to 1.5 days.
AND latest smartphone with average 5.5' inch dimensions - this is . This smartphone is LeEco's flagship for 2016, which still remains relevant. The charge of this smart should normally be enough for the same 1.5 days of use.
Giants of autonomy
And now we move on to the limb. Namely to best smartphones in terms of autonomy.
Somehow it turned out that those smartphones that show the best performance in terms of autonomy are large in size. Therefore, they are not entirely suitable for everyone. Or they may simply be suitable for those who want a tablet and a smartphone in one.
Huawei Honor Note 8
This is a very good smartphone in terms of power with good technical indicators. It has a 4500 mAh battery, which is a good indicator today, about 1.5 working days. In addition, it has a very large 6.6' inch 2K screen and a very thin 7.2mm body.
The first thing we'll talk about is the year of manufacture.
These are slightly smaller in size than Honor Note 8, but slightly better performance in terms of autonomy. After all, 4850 mah in this slim body, namely 7.5 mm - this is already a very good indicator. The first Mi Max comes in two processor variants, namely Snapdragon 650 and Snapdragon 652.
Both options are the best for budget gaming maximum settings graphics. And with such a large battery, such a monster is definitely enough for all tasks for a stable 2 - 2.5 days.
And the last smartphone for today is from 2017.
In short, this is an improved version of the first generation. The only negative is the processor, which is somewhat weaker than the one in the first Mi Max.
However, if in powerful games you don’t play much, and even if you play, but not at maximum graphics settings, then this is just a very smart solution among the “shovels”. And if we talk about batteries, then this is 5300 mAh with almost the same thickness and dimensions as the first “Max”. This big guy will 100% last you for a stable 2.5-3 days.
Conclusion
The choice of this or that smartphone is always yours. We are only trying to talk about those that are really worth taking a closer look at, because they have very good performance autonomy.
Sometimes it seems that in trying to make smartphones thinner and faster, manufacturers forget about this important parameter, as the duration of work. Smartphones in modern form They exist for about 10 years, but their operating time between recharges remains approximately the same. During this time, processors have become much more powerful, screens have become larger and clearer.
Fortunately, there are solid models that won't run out of charge in the middle of the workday. Below is a list of five smartphones with high modern standards duration of work.
BlackBerry smartphone KeyOne isn't perfect, and the developers made a few compromises, especially in terms of performance and price. Where it is definitely uncompromising is in autonomy. Under physical keyboard There is a fairly large battery with a capacity of 3505 mAh. This is noticeably more than you will get in or.
Together with the not-fastest and most modest screen with a diagonal of 4.5 inches and a resolution of 1620 x 1080 pixels, the device can work for a day and a half. This may not be the most outstanding result on this list, but it is the best for devices with a QWERTY keyboard. It's nice to know that you won't have to constantly plug in your device to be able to type on this keyboard.
On paper, it seems that HTC's flagship smartphone has average battery life. The battery capacity here is 3000 mAh, the same as in the Galaxy S8, and significantly less compared to 3300 mAh in the . So it was surprising to learn that the HTC U11 is capable of lasting more than a day even under heavy workload. By the end of the evening, the charge level was about 40%, which is an excellent value for smartphones with similar hardware characteristics.
What makes this smartphone stand out is that there is no need to increase the battery size to achieve this result. This allows you to charge it faster. Thanks to recharging technology, you can charge your device from 22% to 69% in half an hour. Often large batteries It takes a long time to charge, so I'm glad that HTC was able to achieve autonomy in other ways.
If you want to own an iPhone but don't want to charge it often, the iPhone 7 Plus should be your choice. Compared with Plus model the developers increased the battery size from 2750 mAh to 2900 mAh. The result is a device that can last more than a day. Is not best indicator In its class, Apple could increase the battery capacity even more, but the result is already above average.
It may soon be improved upon release. As usual, in the new generation of smartphones, characteristics are expected to develop in all areas, including the battery.
The best flagship smartphones They cost between $700-$800 and have decent, but not exceptional, longevity. It would seem that to get a device with maximum autonomy you will have to pay more than $1000. Actually this is not true. Smartphone Moto The E4 Plus puts all its rivals to shame in terms of autonomy, and at the same time costs $180.
How is this possible at a price 4 times less than flagships? To achieve high results, a massive 5000 mAh battery was required, not the most strong processor Snapdragon 425 and a modest 720p screen. All this allows the device to work for two days under high load. With less frequent use, you can get up to three days. It is unlikely that you will find a smartphone that can compete with budget model. Of course, this is not the most powerful device, but its capabilities are sufficient for most users who are not gamers and are not keen on virtual reality.
If you liked your previous smartphone, but it's not fast enough for your needs, what should you do? Moto Z2 Play is a mid-range alternative where the duration battery life slightly reduced, but increased speed. The battery capacity is 3000 mAh, which provides up to two days of operation. In addition, the battery capacity can be increased, because this is a modular smartphone.
Moto Mods attach to the back of your smartphone and can expand functionality. You can add wireless charging or external stereo speakers. There are several modules for (Incipio Offgrid, Mophie Juice Pack, Motorola TurboPower Pack) that bring with them extra battery. Unfortunately, at a price of $80 they cannot be called cheap, but with them the autonomy of this smartphone will be the highest on this list.
IN this moment these are five smartphones with better autonomy. Market mobile devices is constantly changing and the pre-New Year sales season looms on the horizon. This means the emergence of many new models, among which there may be smartphones with good battery life.
We compare the 2017 flagships in terms of battery capacity, autonomy rating and operating time on a single charge. To get the full picture, let’s include the 2016 flagships in the comparison.
Surveys show that the autonomy rating of a smartphone is one of the key, if not the main, parameter when choosing a phone. The reason is clear - modern devices can provide outstanding speed, but the operating time on a single charge leaves much to be desired. Therefore, you have to choose carefully.
As part of this publication, we will compare the new flagships of 2017 in terms of autonomy rating and operating time on a single charge. different modes operation. To make the picture complete and the article as informative as possible, we will include in the comparison the best Chinese flagships of last year, iPhone 7, LG V20 and Google Pixel with his older brother.
Autonomy rating of flagship smartphones 2016-2017
Let's start with a complex indicator - the autonomy rating. The battery life rating of a smartphone shows how long the battery lasts on average if you talk on 3G networks for 1 hour a day, watch videos for 1 hour and use the Internet for 1 hour. In other words, the autonomy rating characterizes the operating time of the battery under standard operating conditions.
The Samsung 2017 flagship climbed unexpectedly high. Unexpected, because the Galaxy S8+ display with a diagonal of 6.2 inches and a resolution of 2960 x 1440 consumes a lot of energy. However, by optimizing software and advanced hardware, the developers managed to compensate for the screen's appetites. However, with the Always On Display function enabled, the battery life rating of the Samsung 2017 flagship will be lower - 58 hours.
Note. Diagrams are not displayed correctly in Samsung browser Internet, older browsers and some built-in browsers on mobile platforms. We recommend opening the publication in current builds Google Chrome, Opera or Firefox.
Flagship comparison: battery life rating (hours)
Chinese flagships 2017 took places in the middle of the table. Leadership Xiaomi flagship 2016 release is a little surprising, because the Mi 5 battery capacity is only 3000 mAh. One of the worst results is from the LG G6, despite the 3300 mAh. The lowest battery rating is the iPhone 7 with a 1960 mAh battery and the Google Pixel with a 2770 mAh battery.
New flagships 2017: call time
Of the new flagships in 2017, the S8+ lasted the longest in calls. Last year's phones - Google Pixel XL and OnePlus 3T - became the longest-lived ones when talking on 3G networks. In the middle part of the rating, all smartphones showed comparable results. The iPhone 7 was once again an outsider.
Comparison of flagships 2016-2017: calls on 3G networks
Battery life when surfing the web and watching videos
Comparing phones in terms of time spent surfing the Internet and watching videos is interesting because in these modes the screen has a noticeable impact on the battery life rating of a smartphone. The larger the screen and the higher the resolution, the more difficult it is to feed it, so by default the advantage goes to compact smartphones with Full HD resolution and lower, although only the iPhone 7 is lower.
At active screen The battery lasts less, this is understandable, the question is how strong the drop in numbers will be compared to a conversation on 3G networks, and how much the indicators will differ when watching videos and surfing the web, because in the second case not only the screen, but also the modem is active .
In terms of time spent on the Internet, the best in the flagship league 2016-2017 was Huawei Mate 9. The 4000 mAh battery is enough for 14 hours of operation, and this despite the 5.9-inch diagonal. The performance was affected by Full HD resolution, which is less demanding on the battery. Concerning technological process manufactured by Kirin 960 (Huawei Mate 9 chipset), it cannot be considered an advantage; all flagships are built on modern platforms, there are no models on 20 nm or 28 nm process technology among them.
The iPhone 7 Plus has excellent numbers, which, unlike the basic version, has a 2900 mAh battery. Xiaomi Mi5 and Galaxy S8+ are ranked high. The iPhone 7 also has good performance, which is explained by the resolution of 1334 x 750 with a diagonal of 4.7 inches. Google Pixel again found itself in the group of outsiders, accompanied by LG V20 and Xperia XZs.
Flagship comparison: Internet browsing time
The last mode for testing autonomy is watching videos. The modem does not work here, but it is actively working graphics adapter, due to which the numbers may differ greatly from those we saw in the previous ranking.
iPhone 7 Plus slides into the bottom half of the table of ranks. He was accompanied by iPhone 7, HTC U Ultra, LG V20 and. Slightly improved the damaged reputation of Google Pixel. The leaders were the Samsung flagships produced in 2016-2017, Xiaomi Mi5 and OnePlus 3T. The Chinese flagships Huawei Mate 9 and P10 Plus are gaining good numbers.
Comparison of flagships: operating time when watching video
Flagship autonomy rating 2016-2017: results
The 2016 model year also shows consistently high results. big screen and, accordingly, expanded battery capacity. Basic versions with a lower battery capacity they are outperformed, although only slightly.
From Chinese flagships let's highlight Xiaomi Mi 5 and OnePlus 3T. Smartphones hold a charge well in almost all operating modes, and Mi5 generally topped the overall battery life rating of smartphones.
Huawei's flagships occupy places in the middle of the table, although they periodically slide to the bottom. From Huawei phones Huawei Mate 9 also looks preferable.
The greatest problems with autonomy await owners of Google Pixel, iPhone 7 and LG V20. If you often use screen-on modes, you can add Xperia XZs and Xperia XZs to the group of outsiders.
| Battery capacity | |
|---|---|
| Huawei Mate 9 | 4000 mAh |
| Huawei P10 Plus | 3750 mAh |
| Huawei P10 | 3200 mAh |
| Galaxy S8+ | 3500 mAh |
| Galaxy S8 | 3000 mAh |
| Galaxy S7 edge | 3600 mAh |
| Sony Xperia XZs | 2900 mAh |
| LG G6 | 3300 mAh |
| LG V20 | 3200 mAh |
| HTC U Ultra | 3000 mAh |
| iPhone 7 Plus | 2900 mAh |
| iPhone 7 | 1960 mAh |
| Google Pixel | 2770 mAh |
| Google Pixel XL | 3450 mAh |
| OnePlus 3T | 3500 mAh |
| Xiaomi Mi 5 | 3000 mAh |
Smartphone batteries are often not considered as the main characteristic of a device, however, for many users, the autonomy of their device is fundamental. The market is overflowing with a variety of smartphones - modern, with top options - but which ones are among them? most autonomous smartphones? Most of the tested smartphones released in 2016 and on the eve of 2017 - including many flagships - have excellent specifications and features. Many have super cameras, bright and contrasting screens, and generally a lot of bells and whistles in practical software. All this makes life easier for the user: make calls, go online and receive a lot of entertainment functions from the smartphone.
But in an effort to sell as many of their products as possible, many manufacturers miss key moment on a smartphone: battery capacity, which determines battery life of smartphones.
The Phone Arena website tried to collect interesting statistics regarding the battery life of smartphones.
The sample and statistics were based on Android devices, and the graph shows that a number of brands have achieved impressive improvements in the operating time of their largest smartphones.
And of course, software, battery size, processor and screen type all correlate with smartphone battery life.
Read also:
And if you delve into the specifications and draw an analogy in the change of generations, you can find the same dependence. Thus, the iPhone 6s is a vivid example of this, with its new iOS 9, which has impressive battery life.
Read also:
In the cases of Sony, it is obvious that the transition to high-performance processors Qualcomm Snapdragon The 810 c greatly “crippled” its flagships in two generations - in terms of autonomy of the device’s service. And only then, in the Xperia Z5 to Xperia X models, we already see a “rebirth” - the transition to the Snapdragon 650 processor and the installation Android firmware Marshmallow has improved the battery life of smartphones significantly.
But the trick is that, believe it or not, a feature like battery life DOES NOT SELL phones.
Specifications, hardware and options such as a QHD screen, innovative materials and design that make the device thin - yes, they are helping to drive smartphone sales.
That's why most Android manufacturers release new flagships once a year, and then ignore updating them for the rest of the year. latest version software
Vendors always move to NEXT BIG project, a new top device. Because that is what brings the most profit. Last year's models are written off, the remainder is sold at cost to retail outlets and forgotten about, switching to fresh models.
That's why fragmentation exists and why it's not going away anytime soon, even though Google is trying to solve the problem with its multiple initiatives. But if all this is not important to you, and the main thing for you is that the phone provides battery life for a full day under intense load, then our rating of the most standalone smartphones should help you navigate the sea of new products with excellent battery life.
The devices listed below cannot be called “the best,” but in terms of battery they cannot be surpassed—they claim the title of “the best standalone smartphones.”
Read also:
Huawei Mate 9
Picking up on last year's abandoned Mate 8, Huawei Mate 9 takes a few more steps forward in a number of options. The device has already become one of the favorites of 2017 thanks to its amazing camera, excellent software, ultra-powerful processor and excellent performance battery.
In a world where there is already a long-lasting Galaxy Note The Mate 9 is essentially the best phablet out there, and even though it doesn't have a stylus, its battery life is still impressive.
Indestructible, super-survivable battery - thanks to the brilliant proprietary Kirin processor and optimized smart software.
In the video test, the Mate 9 played HD video for a solid 14.5 hours - this is a huge figure, more than the Google Pixel XL and Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE.
Huawei has shown that its “buddy” Mate 9 is a very cool competitor to devices from brands such as Samsung, Apple, LG.
Huawei Mate 9 Specifications Details: Full HD screen, 5.9 inches, Android 7.0 (Nougat), 8-core Hisilicon Kirin 960, 4GB RAM, 64 GB internal memory, main camera - dual 20 MP +12 MP, f/2.2, 27mm, with OIS, 2 -x zoom, Leica lens, with laser autofocus, dual-tone flash, selfie camera 8 MP f/1.9, 26mm, 1080p, works with 2 SIM cards, battery capacity 4000 mAh, fingerprint sensor.
Google Pixel XL
Google Pixel XL is another great device that will impress with its battery life. But it is also very expensive.
The days of Nexus sales are over, but those users who choose this device will get complete satisfaction for the money they spent on it. This fantastic phone has its own unique chips and the best specifications in its class.
Read also:
The Pixel line is the first time that Google has complete control over its smartphone releases. HTC, of course, actually produced this device, BUT. It acted exclusively as a hardware manufacturer - and nowhere, in any capacity, is this brand mentioned - neither in promotion nor in marketing strategies.
In general, Google tried to create... iPhone. It wants more control over its software, over how people will use it and, naturally, the associated revenue through the release of hardware.
Talking about hardware Google is trying a lot harder for this now. So, remembering things like Google Home or smartphones like Pixel, Google company, like Microsoft, is consistently promoting ITS hardware initiatives.
And the reason for this - the desire for control - is simple and obvious.
But perhaps the most useful of all is the Google Pixel XL's battery life. If you choose the light version, the phone will last 1.5-2 days - easy!
If the device is under heavy load all day, you will have another 20% charge left. Do not doubt, the ability of a smartphone to use its charge economically is the pure truth.
SpecificationsPixel XL: 5.5-inch AMOLED screen(pixel density 534 ppi), Corning Gorilla Glass 4 protection, Android 7.1 (Nougat), 4-core Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821, 4GB RAM, 32/128 GB internal. Camera modules: main 12.3 MP, f/2.0, EIS (gyro), laser autofocus, dual-LED flash, selfie camera - 8 MP, f/2.4, 1/3.2″ sensor size, 1.4 µm pixel size, 1080p, fingerprint sensor. Battery capacity 3450 mAh.
ASUS Zenfone Max
ASUS Zenfone Max has one of the largest batteries on the planet - 5000 mAh. This means that the device itself is not small. But its “non-dischargeable” battery offsets its bulky appearance. And even though Zenfone Max is already a year old, its specifications are relevant to those who are looking for the most autonomous smartphone 2017 However, the budget is limited, then the choice is obvious.
ASUS Zenfone Max Specifications: IPS screen LCD 5.5 inches, resolution 720 x 1280, Corning Gorilla Glass 4 protection, 8-core Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615, memory card slot, 32GB built-in, 3GB RAM, main camera 13 MP, f/2.0, laser autofocus, dual-tone flash, front-camera 5 MP, f/2.0, Android OS 6.0.1 (Marshmallow).
With identical external characteristics And same use differ in various indicators battery life. The reason for this was the installation: part new iPhones run on a chip from TSMC, the other part is built on a processor from a South Korean manufacturer Samsung.
The guys from the YouTube channel checked how critical this difference is Austin Evans. Visual test of two models iPhone 6s with different processors:
Original video
The essence of the test
All iPhone 6s and 6s Plus are divided into two camps: one with Samsung chips made of 1 4nm technology, others - with processors from TSMC, the production of which is carried out under 16nm process. The difference in manufacturing principles was also reflected in the final area of the processors: the chip from Samsung is 8.5 mm smaller than that from TSMC: 96 mm against 104.5 mm(square millimeters).
To carry out the test, two completely identical to the model iPhone 6s: one memory capacity, one color, but perfect different processors. Both smartphones charged to 50% mark.
Austin used the utility to test the battery Geekbench 3 and the corresponding benchmark. Before the experiment, using a lux meter, the brightness of both gadgets was set to the same level 200 nits. After which both iPhones over the next two seconds extra hours passed Battery Benchmark.
The winner in this battle was a smartphone powered by a TSMC processor. He worked 50 minutes longer“colleagues” from Samsung. Using a thermal imager, the potential heating temperature of smartphones was determined: a Samsung chip warmed up the smartphone up to 33 degrees Celsius, while TSMC is up to 30.
Testing potential battery life using artificial tests has nothing to do with how a user uses a smartphone in everyday life. The algorithm of work of such testers is as follows: maximum load processor in order to dramatically increase power consumption. In reality, the user is interested in quieter operation, and therefore another test was carried out.
This time Austin launched a lengthy video from YouTube networks on both smartphones. Both were connected to the same wireless Wi-Fi networks and before starting the test are charged at the same level in percentage terms.
As a result of the playback test streaming video The winner was again the iPhone, powered by a TSMC chip. True, the difference this time was only 1%: the iPhone 6s on a chip from Samsung used up 15% of the battery charge; model with TSMC on board – 14%.
How to find out what processor is installed in an iPhone?
If you are uneasy at heart and you can’t wait to find out what processor is installed in your smartphone, use the information utility Lirum Info Lite.
This application is distributed absolutely free, and to obtain information about the processor, just run Lirum. Pay attention to the model name indicated opposite the item Model.
In the model iPhone 6s processors have the following names:
- N71AP– manufacturer Samsung;
- N71MAP- Manufacturer: TSMC.
In smartphones iPhone 6s Plus the situation is as follows:
- N66AP– manufacturer Samsung;
- N66MAP- Manufacturer: TSMC.
Conclusion. When testing battery performance using the GeekBench 3 utility, the device is subject to high loads, during which the smartphone processor operates at maximum power. In this case, a chip from TSMC is a better option. At regular work: reading mail, watching movies, surfing, listening to music, taking photos or videos, there is practically no difference between both processors.
Perhaps there is no reason to be upset at all?
