Which is better mtk or qualcomm. MediaTek Helio X20 or Snapdragon? Chipset comparison

If you use your phone only for calls, reading books and surfing the Internet, then the question of what processor is inside is not very important. This becomes important for those who intend to use the gadget beyond its capabilities, for example, for gamers. Let's take a closer look at the two market leaders mobile processors: Qualcomm and MediaTek.

What determines the performance of smartphones?

Subjectively, it is assessed as the speed of launching applications and rendering the interface, the absence of freezes, and quick response to control actions. Of course, processor parameters are important for all this, but we must not forget about other factors:

• volume random access memory,
• type of processor used,
• graphics adapter type.

The highest performance is achieved with the best balance of these three indicators.

Platforms for mobile devices

Most mobile devices are now released on the OS platform Android. It's free operating system on Linux kernel, promoted by Google, which is why many electronics manufacturers use it for their gadgets.

The second most popular platform is iOS, which is installed only on products Apple. Source is closed, no other manufacturer can use this OS on their devices.

Processor manufacturers

Not many companies produce chipsets for mobile devices. You can compare some of them, occupying top lines popularity.

Qualcomm is an American company developing wireless devices communications and chipsets for mobile devices. Today it is one of the leaders in this industry.

MediaTek is a Chinese engineering company designing microelectronics since 1997. It does not have its own production facilities, it is only engaged in development. Is the second main leader in this field. The headquarters is located in Taiwan, and branches are scattered throughout many countries around the world.

Samsung is a well-known South Korean corporation involved in many industries, from heavy industry to the entertainment industry. In the consumer market it is known primarily for its electronics and household appliances. Its electronics division also produces processors for mobile phones. They are mainly installed in domestically produced equipment.

Intel– the undisputed technological leader in development microprocessor technology. The company is best known for its chipsets for computers, servers and communications equipment, but mobile processors are also in its product line. This is for example, famous brand Atom.

Which processor to choose for a smartphone: from Qualcomm or MediaTek

Just a few years ago, MediaTek products were considered budget products, aimed exclusively at the lower price range. The quality was low, and the percentage of various failures was significantly higher than that of competitors. But in last years this is no longer the case. The company has learned to design chipsets that are not inferior in quality to Qualcomm products. However, prejudice against Chinese developer still remains.

It makes sense to pay attention to the processor manufacturer when buying a smartphone or tablet if you are going to work with “heavy” applications, for example, mobile games.

For simple, uncomplicated applications, which are typical tasks for most users ( phone calls, banking programs, personal organizers, surfing the Internet, etc.) the difference is practically unimportant.

What do Qualcomm and MediaTek have in common?

Two industry leaders have some common features if only because they work in a narrow market segment. Both of them develop processors and chipsets for mobile gadgets, and at the same time do not have their own production facilities - third-party manufacturing companies directly manufacture equipment for them.

In the line of both companies there are products of all price categories, from the most budgetary to the most expensive. And yet they are all based on ARM architecture.

Pros and cons of Qualcomm processors

The Cortex processor core, which the company licensed from the British company ARM back in 2005, was redesigned for its own products. Currently, Qualcomm processors are produced under the Snapdragon brand. Its own microkernel gives the company serious competitive advantage(for example, other developers are forced to use it).

Based on its own ARM architecture, Qualcomm engineers are constantly improving the technology. Latest generations processors under the Krait brand are manufactured using a 28-nanometer process technology. They include models with one, two and four cores.

Embedded coprocessors and communication modules often begin to support new communication technologies even before these standards are brought to market. mobile operators. Chipsets work with all network standards without exception.

The company has its own Adreno GPU, which is also constantly updated. In general, Qualcomm has a reputation as a company at the very forefront of technological progress.

The shortcomings of the American giant's products are usually associated with inflated prices. The constant pursuit of new products leads to the fact that products with Qualcomm chips are more expensive than their classmates and competitors.

In addition, the company has historically focused on the luxury segment of technology. The main attention is paid to expensive, top-end smartphones and tablets, while budget offers remain few. Perhaps this is the policy of the company's management.

Pros and cons of MediaTek processors

MediaTek processors have their own advantages and disadvantages.

The main one is low price devices built on chipsets from this developer. The company initially, from the time of its inception, focused on budget segment electronics. Even the flagships of product lines usually have prices at the level of average competitors.

The second advantage follows from the first, namely a wide range of products. At the bottom price category Almost the entire range of mobile electronics is based on the developments of MediaTek.

For its graphics subsystem, the company uses cores from the manufacturing company ARM. This basic solution, unlike the proprietary Adreno GPU that Qualcomm developed for itself. In such conditions, producers software It's easier to customize your products. As a result, programs, and especially games, are less buggy and generate fewer errors. This also leads to a decrease total price gadgets.

Of the minuses, the main one is probably the continuing reputation of a manufacturer of low-quality equipment. Due to the desire to save wherever possible, the company introduces technological innovations later than its competitors. This can partly explain the poor quality support for mobile application developers.

MediaTek does not develop the microkernel of its processors itself, like Qualcomm, but uses the basic Cortex solution. Such kernels are more difficult to optimize for their own solutions, and as a result they often lose in performance.

Processor frequency: which is better for a smartphone?

All mobile devices are designed with the expectation that they will run on batteries, which means that the issue of saving charge is very important. In the marketing promotion of gadgets, operating time on a single charge is important, and a device that requires charging as little as possible is more convenient for users.

This is taken into account when designing mobile electronics. All processors for smartphones and tablets can regulate their frequency: increase it at moments full load and vice versa, reduce during idle time to save battery. The specifications always indicate the maximum frequency at which the microcircuit can operate.

Modern mobile phones very rarely have a processor frequency below 1000 MHz. The upper limit today is only slightly beyond the value of 2.5 GHz.

• From 1000 to 1300 MHz – the lower limit, budget and most affordable device models.
• From 1300 to 1700 MHz – middle segment both in price and in capabilities.
• From 1700 MHz and above – top models, flagships of their lines.

How many cores are needed for the device to function effectively?

It may seem that the more cores a processor has, the faster it is. In fact, this is not at all true, and there is no direct relationship here. For example, MediaTek products can have up to 10 cores in one processor, but its overall performance is unlikely to be better than a 4-processor chip from Qualcomm.

Qualitative and thorough optimization of all components and blocks of the processor is decisive for performance. For example, Apple has solutions with only two cores, and at the same time they are in no way inferior to four- and even eight-core counterparts from competitors in the same class.

How will the 64-bit Mediatek MT6752 perform in comparison with the 64-bit Qualcomm Snapdragon 615?

At the time of writing, the main topic mobile market was the phrase “64-bit processor”. This term was pronounced on every corner like a mantra and was actively used by marketers to promote devices. A 64-bit processor is important step, but not only because of the 64-bit chip, but also others additional functions, which he brought to portable devices.

There are quite a number of 64-bit chips on the market today, but the most talked about are Mediatek MT6752 and Snapdragon 615 from Qualcomm. Both chips are used in many mid-range and high class, but which one is better?

This article compares two popular chinese phone with 64-bit chips. Qualcomm is on the side, and Mediatek’s honor is defended by the iOcean MT6752 Rock. Both phones were subjected to popular benchmark tests to find out which one delivers better performance. Before we get into the comparisons and results, let's take a look at the specs and features of both the processors.

MT6752 has eight cores ARM Cortex-53 at 1.7 GHz and Mali-T760 GPU, it has 4G LTE support. The processor is capable of supporting a camera up to 16 MP, and video recording is possible in 1080p resolution at 60 frames per second.

In turn, Snapdragon 615 introduces the industry's first 64-bit eight-core Cortex-A53 CPU. This chip has 4 cores at 1.7 GHz and 4 at 1 GHz. The Adreno 405 GPU can support screen resolutions of up to 2560x1600 pixels and cameras of up to 21 MP.

Both chips have their advantages: Mediatek seems more focused on productivity, and Snapdragon 615 on media entertainment.

Now we can take a closer look at the processors and their capabilities in the benchmarks and see which one will perform better.

Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: Vellamo app

Vellamo started out as a mobile online tester and was later expanded into two main parts. The HTML5 part measures the performance of mobile devices while surfing the web, and the Metal part measures the single-core performance of the CPU subsystem of mobile processors.

Vellamo can evaluate scrolling and zooming, 3D graphics, video performance, processing speed internal memory, peak throughput and even more.

Based on this web test, performance appears to be about equal. This means that in scaling, loading, 3D graphics and video streaming, they will give customers the same efficiency.

Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: Ludashi App

Ludashi Android version is a performance test app for phones and tablets. 8 tests make it easy to determine performance mobile device and compare it with another.

Ultimately, the OPPO R5's results are far behind what the iOcean M6752 can offer. This means that the M6752's single-core performance is better than that of the OPPO R5, as the MT6752's results were almost double those of the Snapdragon.

Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: gaming performance

Since both phones have a 1080p screen, their SoC should consume the same amount of power. In this test, the difference in SoC was determined using famous games.

The iOcean M6752 smartphone is equipped GPU Mali-T760. Output speed in main screen games Need for Speed ​​is normal, but the Mali GPU loses a little in overall graphical clarity.

In turn, OPPO R5 has an Adreno 405 graphics card, which performed better overall. Although the smoothness and quality are excellent on both phones, general impressions The games on the Snapdragon 615 are as good as on the MT6752.

NBA 2015 is a fresh game at that time, requiring a processor and graphics card good performance. The iOcean M6752 handled the game quite fluently, stuttering only a couple of times, while the Snapdragon 615 really disappointed in this game. The processor had a lot of difficulty with gameplay and the overall image looked sluggish.

Other tests:

Mediatek MT6752 and Snapdragon 615

Snapdragon 615

Mediatek MT6752

Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: Conclusion

While on paper both processors offer high standards and seem like they can handle anything, in fact the MT6752 in the iOcean MT6752 performed much better.

For most applications, each processor is good enough, but when it comes to something complex, the Mediatek 64-bit processor can kick into overdrive and handle heavy loads competently and smoothly. It seems to me that Oppo made a big mistake by using Snapdragon 615 instead of Mediatek MT6752 in their device. Not only because the MTK chip is more powerful, but also because it helps lower the price of the phone. This explains why iOcean sells its phone internationally for just over $200, while Oppo's price is closer to $500.

If you have dealt with any of these processors, please share your opinion in the comments.

Snapdragon processors: advantages and disadvantages of chipsets from S430 to S821. Comparison of the performance of smartphones on Snapdragon processors in benchmarks.

Which Snapdragon processor is better? To answer the question, we compare current models Qualcomm chipsets, which can be found not only in old smartphones, but also in phones released in 2017. Let's compare the characteristics first Snapdragon processors and talk about the key features of each model, after which we will confirm predictions regarding operating speed with the results of testing smartphones in popular benchmarks.

Characteristics of Snapdragon processors

Key characteristics of any processor - manufacturing process, core architecture central processor, the number of cores and their clock speed, as well as the graphics accelerator of the chipset. These specifications should be given the closest attention.

The heating of the smartphone, the degree of its susceptibility to throttling (a drop in clock frequency under load) and the operating time of the smartphone on a single charge depend on the technical process. The “smaller” the technological process, the more economically the chipset uses the battery.

The architecture of the cores, their number and clock frequency affect the speed of operation. Powerful cores, particularly Cortex A72 or Kryo, consume more power but perform many more operations per clock. Simply put, they are faster. Economical cores, which include cores based on the Cortex A53 architecture, are designed to solve simple tasks. They do not consume the battery as aggressively, but they also work slower with processes.

Snapdragon processors: technical specifications

	430	625	650	820
Technical process	28 nm	14 nm	28 nm	14 nm
Number of Cores	8	8	6	4
Processor architecture	8x ARM Cortex A53	8x ARM Cortex A53	2x ARM Cortex A72+ 4x ARM Cortex A53	4x Kryo CPU
Clock frequency	up to 1.4 GHz	up to 2.0 GHz	up to 1.8 GHz	up to 2.15 GHz
Graphics accelerator	Adreno 505 GPU	Adreno 506 GPU	Adreno 510 GPU	Adreno 530 GPU
LTE modem	LTE Cat.4 download 150 Mbps transmission up to 50 Mbit/s	LTE Cat.13/7 download 300 Mbps transmission up to 150 Mbit/s	LTE Cat.7 download 300 Mbps transmission up to 100 Mbit/s	LTE Cat.13/12 download 600 Mbps transmission up to 150 Mbit/s

The number of processor cores affects the speed of the phone in multitasking mode. If the cores are built on the same architecture, then the more there are, the better. But when switching to a new architecture, the rule no longer works.

Smartphones with a quad-core Snapdragon 820 processor are faster than 8-core phones built on previous generations of chipsets. The difference in speed is explained by the fact that the improved cores perform more operations per unit of time, due to which they confidently outperform their “slow” predecessors.

The graphics adapter determines the speed of the smartphone in games and when working with 3D graphics. Qualcomm Snapdragon processors use different generations Adreno graphics, which are a priori characterized by high performance. Updated versions adapters with a large index are faster than their predecessors, which affects the framerate. This will be clearly visible from the benchmark results.

Key features of Qualcomm Snapdragon processors

In this part of the article we talk about the key features of various models of Qualcomm Snapdragon processors, highlighting their strengths and weak sides from the point of view of efficiency, speed of operation and degree of heating when solving complex (and not so complex) problems.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 430

Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 is the weakest chipset on our list. Its only advantage is its low cost. Manufacturers who want to offer the buyer inexpensive smartphone, this chipset is chosen as a compromise solution.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 processor is built on 8 reference Cortex A53 cores, which operate at a very low frequency by modern standards 1.4 GHz. Accordingly, you can forget about the high speed of the smartphone even before purchasing it. Graphics accelerator Adreno 505 also grazes the rear ones. It will still allow you to play at minimum settings, but the framerate will be low.

Since Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 is manufactured at 28 nm technological process, it uses up the battery relatively quickly for such a slow processor. Compare battery life ratings and . Due to the same technical process, heating in games and when working with heavy applications will be noticeable.

Snapdragon 625 processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 is a very interesting chipset, in a sense, even cool. Of course, oh cosmic speeds This is not the case here; the main advantage of the model is extremely low energy consumption with practically complete absence heating and throttling.

Excellent energy efficiency is explained by the fact that the Snapdragon 625 processor is manufactured using a modern 14 nm process technology. For the same reason, he always remains cold, even in games. Graphics accelerator power Adreno 506 Enough for playing at minimum and medium settings.

The speed of the central processor is not prohibitive, but higher than that of the S430. The performance of the smartphone is also higher - Android will work smoothly, there should also be no problems with applications, according to at least, if the Snapdragon 625 is paired with at least 3 GB of RAM. ( .)

Snapdragon 650 processor

Compared with Qualcomm processors Snapdragon, which we reviewed earlier, 650 Dragon is almost a champion in terms of speed. This is explained by the fact that the processor architecture uses improved Cortex A72 cores. Yes, the total number of cores is smaller, but by performing more operations per clock cycle, the processor runs much faster, as do the phones built on it.

A graphics accelerator gives a performance boost in games Adreno 510. When compared to the Snapdragon 625 and 430 processors, the difference is obvious. You will find the comparison results at the end of the publication in GFX benchmarks. The frame rate in games will be higher, and you can play not only at medium, but also at maximum settings.

The disadvantage of the Snapdragon 650 processor is that it is produced according to the 28 nm process technology. Because of this, the chipset gets very hot and drops frequencies under heavy load, including in 3D toys. This feature should be taken into account by those who like to play for a long time and do not want to experience a drop in fps. Battery consumption is also higher, and time battery life smartphone - less.

A few words about Snapdragon 652. It differs from the 650 model in the increased number of cores to eight, with additional cores built on the Cortex A72 architecture (powerful). Thanks to this, it is even faster, although it does not reach the S820. The disadvantages due to the 28 nm process technology are the same - throttling and high battery consumption.

Snapdragon 820/821 processors

Qualcomm Snapdragon 820/821 - top chipsets of 2016. Their strengths - high speed work and relatively low, as for fast processors, battery consumption. The chipsets are equipped with the Adreno 530 graphics accelerator, which last year broke records and outperformed almost all competitors.

If you really need fast smartphone, or if you want to play heavy games at maximum frame rates, smartphones with a quad-core Snapdragon 820 processor will be excellent choice. Excellent, but not without its shortcomings. The problem is that smartphones based on the Snapdragon 820, despite the 14 nm manufacturing process, are susceptible to overheating, and they sometimes heat up to uncomfortable temperatures.

Qualcomm engineers tried to solve the problem in one of the versions of the Snapdragon 821. The “cold” version of the S821 received the AB index, and it operates at the same reference frequencies as the S820. Smartphones with a quad-core Snapdragon 821 processor are not always faster than phones at 820 Dragon, but they may be colder. In a sense, this is even better, because the 820 is already fast enough.

The non-AB version of Snapdragon 821 is overclocked to 2.3 GHz processor on the same architecture and with the same number of cores (4 Kryo CPU cores). An example of a smartphone with a 4-core Snapdragon 821 non-AB processor. For comparison, or are built on the Snapdragon 821, which operates at reference frequencies without increasing processing power.

Snapdragon 835 processors

The latest Snapdragon 835 chipset is a blast in terms of performance. In this publication we will not talk about it in detail, because a special material is devoted to comparing the S835 and S821 processors.

Snapdragon processors: comparison in benchmarks

Let's move on to comparing Snapdragon processors in popular benchmarks. There will be a lot of charts below that may not display correctly in older browsers and some built-in browsers on mobile platforms. If you encounter this problem, open the publication in the current build of Mozilla, Opera or Chrome.

A few explanations about the benchmarks. GeekBench evaluates the power of the central processor, which affects the smooth operation of the operating system.

Snapdragon processors in GeekBench 4 (multi-core)

Snapdragon processors in GeekBench 4 (single-core)

In Antutu and BaseMark OS 2.0 we compare the overall speed of the smartphone.

Snapdragon processors in AnTuTu 6

Snapdragon processors in BaseMark OS 2.0

GFX tests evaluate the power of the graphics accelerator, which correlates with the speed of working with 3D graphics and frame rates in games.

GFX 3.1 Manhattan

GFX 3.1 Car Scene

Snapdragon processor comparison: summary

Any conclusions or comments on the test results are unnecessary; all that remains is to summarize what was said above and highlight key features Snapdragon processors:

1. Snapdragon 430: a budget option, a compromise between the comfort of using the phone and its cost.
2. S625: the best choice for those who need a cool smartphone with high battery life.
3. S650/652: a good option for gamers and those looking for a fast and inexpensive smartphone.
4. S820: a very fast chipset that will last for a couple of years. Smartphones with a quad-core S820/S821 processor are not cheap, although there are affordable options.
5. S835: best processor at the time of publication.

New publications

What is a processor?

Without going into details, this is the central element of the system, which is responsible for all information transformations and controls the computing process.

mobile version chip (ARM) is not much different from its stationary counterpart. The only differences are in size, power and clock frequency.

The latter have lower figures.

All of them have achieved success in this industry, but the main struggle is between Chinese company MediaTek and American Qualcomm.

Qualcomm

The silicon giant was founded back in 1985. The company produced phones, GPS modules and wireless devices.

We will consider it as largest manufacturer mobile chips.

In 2005, they licensed ARM technologies, purchasing the rights to create the Cortex A8 core. Based on it, our own chip was developed.

The top line of chips is called Snapdragon.

These processors are installed in such flagship devices as Sony Xperia Z line, HTC One, LG G2 and G3 and some models Samsung.

But the latest top-end chip Snapdragon 810 has caused a lot of discussion. Some said that it overheats a lot, causing performance to suffer.

But this fact remained undocumented.

8 cores, Cat 6 LTE chip, giving speeds up to 300 Mbps, support for 4K video, as well as sensors up to 55 MP. The figures are impressive.

MediaTek

They take advantage not only of quality, but also of mass production, supplying products to all smartphones costing up to $200.

The most famous “stone”, namely MT6592, installed on budget phones like Lenovo, in particular the S860 and more.

They were the first to develop a 10-core processor called Xelio X20. On this moment is the most powerful single-chip system in the world.

Recruits more than 70,000 “parrots” in AnTuTu. Not yet serially produced.

Specifications include 3 blocks of cores: 2x2.5 GHz, 4x2 GHz and 4x1.4 GHz. Mali 800 graphics and support for 2 13 MP sensors. Wi-Fi support 802.11ac and LTE Cat 6.

Apple

Cupertino residents have always been famous for their closeness. Their unofficial motto can be interpreted as follows: “You don’t need to know what’s inside. Just take it and use it."

And this applies to all the company’s products.

As for the mobile division, the situation here is no less confusing.

It is only known that the company itself develops processors for smartphones and tablets, assigning them the index A and serial number.

In particular, the most powerful mobile stones A8 and A8X are considered. They are equipped with iPhone 6/6 Plus And iPad Air respectively.

Despite 2 cores of 1.4 GHz and an M8 coprocessor, the performance is impressive.

Intel

Despite the fact that this giant leads the ranking of mobile processors for laptops, in the field mobile development he's actually sitting on the bench.

Although the fact that smartphones equipped with chips Intel Atom, are in high demand, we can say that the company is making progress.

Now the strongest chip that is used in series is Z3580. 4 cores at a frequency of 2.33 will give a head start even to such “players” as Snapdragon 801 and Apple A7.

Specifications: 4x2.33 GHz, DDR-1600 support and proprietary graphics from Intel.

Nvidia

The situation with a company that is famous for gaming and overclocker video cards similar to Nvidia.

In their main field, they achieved outstanding results, but things didn’t work out with the mobile segment.

In particular, Tegra chips have good potential, but leading manufacturers are in no hurry to purchase processors in batches.

Yes, Nvidia hardware will be appreciated by gamers.

But the majority of smartphone users are businessmen, young people over the age of 20, and girls who are unlikely to want to “play Doom on ultra.”